Literature DB >> 24581118

The spatial and temporal distributions of arthropods in forest canopies: uniting disparate patterns with hypotheses for specialisation.

Carl W Wardhaugh1.   

Abstract

Arguably the majority of species on Earth utilise tropical rainforest canopies, and much progress has been made in describing arboreal assemblages, especially for arthropods. The most commonly described patterns for tropical rainforest insect communities are host specificity, spatial specialisation (predominantly vertical stratification), and temporal changes in abundance (seasonality and circadian rhythms). Here I review the recurrent results with respect to each of these patterns and discuss the evolutionary selective forces that have generated them in an attempt to unite these patterns in a holistic evolutionary framework. I propose that species can be quantified along a generalist-specialist scale not only with respect to host specificity, but also other spatial and temporal distribution patterns, where specialisation is a function of the extent of activity across space and time for particular species. When all of these distribution patterns are viewed through the paradigm of specialisation, hypotheses that have been proposed to explain the evolution of host specificity can also be applied to explain the generation and maintenance of other spatial and temporal distribution patterns. The main driver for most spatial and temporal distribution patterns is resource availability. Generally, the distribution of insects follows that of the resources they exploit, which are spatially stratified and vary temporally in availability. Physiological adaptations are primarily important for host specificity, where nutritional and chemical variation among host plants in particular, but also certain prey species and fungi, influence host range. Physiological tolerances of abiotic conditions are also important for explaining the spatial and temporal distributions of some insect species, especially in drier forest environments where desiccation is an ever-present threat. However, it is likely that for most species in moist tropical rainforests, abiotic conditions are valuable indicators of resource availability, rather than physiologically limiting factors. Overall, each distribution pattern is influenced by the same evolutionary forces, but at differing intensities. Consequently, each pattern is linked and not mutually exclusive of the other distribution patterns. Most studies have examined each of these patterns in isolation. Future work should focus on examining the evolutionary drivers of these patterns in concert. Only then can the relative strength of resource availability and distribution, host defensive phenotypes, and biotic and abiotic interactions on insect distribution patterns be determined.
© 2014 The Author. Biological Reviews © 2014 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Keywords:  diel activity; enemy-free space; host specificity; insect biodiversity; neural constraints; physiological efficiency; resource availability; seasonality; tropical rainforest; vertical stratification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24581118     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  6 in total

1.  Vertical stratification of a temperate forest caterpillar community in eastern North America.

Authors:  Carlo L Seifert; Greg P A Lamarre; Martin Volf; Leonardo R Jorge; Scott E Miller; David L Wagner; Kristina J Anderson-Teixeira; Vojtěch Novotný
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Bark and Ambrosia Beetles in a Brazilian Tropical Dry Forest.

Authors:  Luiz Eduardo Macedo-Reis; Samuel Matos Antunes de Novais; Graziela França Monteiro; Carlos Alberto Hector Flechtmann; Maurício Lopes de Faria; Frederico de Siqueira Neves
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.857

3.  Diversity of Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Caatinga Biome, Brazil, from the Widespread to the Endemic.

Authors:  David Campos Andrade; Sirlei Antunes Morais; Letícia Silva Marteis; Renata Antonaci Gama; Renato Cesar de Melo Freire; Belgrano Santiago Rekowski; Helene Mariko Ueno; Roseli La Corte
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 2.769

4.  Plant phylogeny drives arboreal caterpillar assemblages across the Holarctic.

Authors:  Carlo L Seifert; Martin Volf; Leonardo R Jorge; Tomokazu Abe; Grace Carscallen; Pavel Drozd; Rajesh Kumar; Greg P A Lamarre; Martin Libra; Maria E Losada; Scott E Miller; Masashi Murakami; Geoffrey Nichols; Petr Pyszko; Martin Šigut; David L Wagner; Vojtěch Novotný
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Spatio-temporal variation of Cerambycidae-host tree interaction networks.

Authors:  Michelle Ramos-Robles; Orthon Ricardo Vargas-Cardoso; Angélica María Corona-López; Alejandro Flores-Palacios; Víctor Hugo Toledo-Hernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Tree canopy arthropods have idiosyncratic responses to plant ecophysiological traits in a warm temperate forest complex.

Authors:  Rudi C Swart; Michael J Samways; Francois Roets
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.