| Literature DB >> 24580033 |
Sally Johnson1, Rose Capdevila.
Abstract
One of the major shifts in the form and experience of contemporary family life has been the increasing insertion of the 'expert' voice into the relationship between parents and children. This paper focuses on an exploration of mothers' engagement with advice around the combined measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine. Much of the previous literature utilises a 'decision-making' framework, based on 'risk assessment' whereby mothers' decisions are conceptualised as rooted in complex belief systems, and supposes that that by gaining an understanding of these systems, beliefs and behaviour can be modified and uptake improved. However, less attention has been paid to the ways in which mothers negotiate such advice or the ways in which advice is mediated by positionings, practices and relationships. Analysis of data from a focus group with five mothers identified three themes: (i) Sourcing advice and information, (ii) Constructing 'Mother knows best' and (iii) Negotiating agency. Despite the trustworthiness of advice and information being questioned, an awareness of concerns about the MMR, and health professionals being constructed as remote, ultimate conformity to, and compliance with, the 'system' and 'society' were described as determining MMR 'decisions'.Entities:
Keywords: advice to mothers; agency; choice; qualitative analysis; risk; the MMR vaccination
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24580033 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2014.892940
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Health ISSN: 0887-0446