Literature DB >> 24580010

Novel placement of cortical bone trajectory screws in previously instrumented pedicles for adjacent-segment lumbar disease using CT image-guided navigation.

Analiz Rodriguez1, Matthew T Neal, Ann Liu, Aravind Somasundaram, Wesley Hsu, Charles L Branch.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Symptomatic adjacent-segment lumbar disease (ASLD) after lumbar fusion often requires subsequent surgical intervention. The authors report utilizing cortical bone trajectory (CBT) pedicle screw fixation with intraoperative CT (O-arm) image-guided navigation to stabilize spinal levels in patients with symptomatic ASLD. This unique technique results in the placement of 2 screws in the same pedicle (1 traditional pedicle trajectory and 1 CBT) and obviates the need to remove preexisting instrumentation.
METHODS: The records of 5 consecutive patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with CBT and posterior interbody grafting for ASLD were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent screw trajectory planning with the O-arm in conjunction with the StealthStation navigation system. Basic demographics, operative details, and radiographic and clinical outcomes were obtained.
RESULTS: The average patient age was 69.4 years (range 58-82 years). Four of the 5 surgeries were performed with the Minimal Access Spinal Technologies (MAST) Midline Lumbar Fusion (MIDLF) system. The average operative duration was 218 minutes (range 175-315 minutes). In the entire cohort, 5.5-mm cortical screws were placed in previously instrumented pedicles. The average hospital stay was 2.8 days (range 2-3 days) and there were no surgical complications. All patients had more than 6 months of radiographic and clinical follow-up (range 10-15 months). At last follow-up, all patients reported improved symptoms from their preoperative state. Radiographic follow-up showed Lenke fusion grades of A or B.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors present a novel fusion technique that uses CBT pedicle screw fixation in a previously instrumented pedicle with intraoperative O-arm guided navigation. This method obviates the need for hardware removal. This cohort of patients experienced good clinical results. Computed tomography navigation was critical for accurate CBT screw placement at levels where previous traditional pedicle screws were already placed for symptomatic ASLD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24580010     DOI: 10.3171/2014.1.FOCUS13521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  23 in total

1.  Morphometric measurement of the lumbosacral spine for minimally invasive cortical bone trajectory implant using computed tomography.

Authors:  Hua Zhang; Remi Musibau Ajiboye; Arya Nick Shamie; Qionghua Wu; Qixin Chen; Weishan Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Minimally invasive PLIF with divergent, cortical trajectory pedicle screws.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Marco Damilano; Maryem Ismael; Carlo Formica; Diego Garbossa; Diego Garbosa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jizhou Wang; Xiaoqi He; Tianwei Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Minimally invasive cortical bone trajectory screws placement via pedicle or pedicle rib unit in the lower thoracic spine: a cadaveric and radiographic study.

Authors:  Jun Xuan; Di Zhang; Hai-Ming Jin; Jiao-Xiang Chen; Dao-Liang Xu; Hong-Ming Xu; Yao-Sen Wu; Xiang-Yang Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Systematic review of cortical bone trajectory versus pedicle screw techniques for lumbosacral spine fusion.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Vignesh Ramachandran; Tommy M Tran; Kevin P Shah; Matthew Fadhil; Alan Lackey; Nicholas Chang; Ai-Min Wu; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

6.  The use of a pedicle screw-cortical screw hybrid system for the surgical treatment of a patient with congenital multilevel spinal non-segmentation defect and spinal column deformity: a technical note.

Authors:  Kimberly Ashayeri; Rani Nasser; Jonathan Nakhla; Reza Yassari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Accuracy of cortical bone trajectory screw placement in midline lumbar fusion (MIDLF) with intraoperative cone beam navigation.

Authors:  Joseph L Laratta; Jamal N Shillingford; Andrew J Pugely; Karishma Gupta; Jeffrey L Gum; Mladen Djurasovic; Charles H Crawford
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

8.  A biomechanical comparison between cortical bone trajectory fixation and pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Hiroki Oshino; Toshihiko Sakakibara; Tadashi Inaba; Takamasa Yoshikawa; Takaya Kato; Yuichi Kasai
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Comparison of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Placement Using the Midline Lumbar Fusion Technique to Traditional Pedicle Screws: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Haydn Hoffman; Brendon Verhave; Muhammad S Jalal; Timothy Beutler; Michael A Galgano; Lawrence S Chin
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-02-22

10.  Feasibility of cortical bone trajectory screws for bridging fixation in revision surgery for lumbar adjacent segment degeneration.

Authors:  Long Wang; Yong-Hui Zhao; Xing-Bo Cai; Jin-Long Liang; Hao-Tian Luo; Yu-Long Ma; Yong-Qing Xu; Sheng Lu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.