Literature DB >> 24579930

High density ozone monitoring using gas sensitive semi-conductor sensors in the Lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia.

Mark Bart1, David E Williams, Bruce Ainslie, Ian McKendry, Jennifer Salmond, Stuart K Grange, Maryam Alavi-Shoshtari, Douw Steyn, Geoff S Henshaw.   

Abstract

A cost-efficient technology for accurate surface ozone monitoring using gas-sensitive semiconducting oxide (GSS) technology, solar power, and automated cell-phone communications was deployed and validated in a 50 sensor test-bed in the Lower Fraser Valley of British Columbia, over 3 months from May-September 2012. Before field deployment, the entire set of instruments was colocated with reference instruments for at least 48 h, comparing hourly averaged data. The standard error of estimate over a typical range 0-50 ppb for the set was 3 ± 2 ppb. Long-term accuracy was assessed over several months by colocation of a subset of ten instruments each at a different reference site. The differences (GSS-reference) of hourly average ozone concentration were normally distributed with mean -1 ppb and standard deviation 6 ppb (6000 measurement pairs). Instrument failures in the field were detected using network correlations and consistency checks on the raw sensor resistance data. Comparisons with modeled spatial O3 fields demonstrate the enhanced monitoring capability of a network that was a hybrid of low-cost and reference instruments, in which GSS sensors are used both to increase station density within a network as well as to extend monitoring into remote areas. This ambitious deployment exposed a number of challenges and lessons, including the logistical effort required to deploy and maintain sites over a summer period, and deficiencies in cell phone communications and battery life. Instrument failures at remote sites suggested that redundancy should be built into the network (especially at critical sites) as well as the possible addition of a "sleep-mode" for GSS monitors. At the network design phase, a more objective approach to optimize interstation distances, and the "information" content of the network is recommended. This study has demonstrated the utility and affordability of the GSS technology for a variety of applications, and the effectiveness of this technology as a means substantially and economically to extend the coverage of an air quality monitoring network. Low-cost, neighborhood-scale networks that produce reliable data can be envisaged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24579930     DOI: 10.1021/es404610t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  14 in total

1.  Field Test of Several Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in High and Low Concentration Urban Environments.

Authors:  Karoline K Johnson; Michael H Bergin; Armistead G Russell; Gayle S W Hagler
Journal:  Aerosol Air Qual Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 2.  Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone?

Authors:  Lidia Morawska; Phong K Thai; Xiaoting Liu; Akwasi Asumadu-Sakyi; Godwin Ayoko; Alena Bartonova; Andrea Bedini; Fahe Chai; Bryce Christensen; Matthew Dunbabin; Jian Gao; Gayle S W Hagler; Rohan Jayaratne; Prashant Kumar; Alexis K H Lau; Peter K K Louie; Mandana Mazaheri; Zhi Ning; Nunzio Motta; Ben Mullins; Md Mahmudur Rahman; Zoran Ristovski; Mahnaz Shafiei; Dian Tjondronegoro; Dane Westerdahl; Ron Williams
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Spatial-temporal variations of summertime ozone concentrations across a metropolitan area using a network of low-cost monitors to develop 24 hourly land-use regression models.

Authors:  Mauro Masiol; Stefania Squizzato; David Chalupa; David Q Rich; Philip K Hopke
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Evaluating the Performance of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Calibrate for Cross-Sensitivities in a Multipollutant Network.

Authors:  Misti Levy Zamora; Colby Buehler; Hao Lei; Abhirup Datta; Fulizi Xiong; Drew R Gentner; Kirsten Koehler
Journal:  ACS ES T Eng       Date:  2022-04-11

5.  Development and Application of a Next Generation Air Sensor Network for the Hong Kong Marathon 2015 Air Quality Monitoring.

Authors:  Li Sun; Ka Chun Wong; Peng Wei; Sheng Ye; Hao Huang; Fenhuan Yang; Dane Westerdahl; Peter K K Louie; Connie W Y Luk; Zhi Ning
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Interpreting Mobile and Handheld Air Sensor Readings in Relation to Air Quality Standards and Health Effect Reference Values: Tackling the Challenges.

Authors:  George M Woodall; Mark D Hoover; Ronald Williams; Kristen Benedict; Martin Harper; Jhy-Charm Soo; Annie M Jarabek; Michael J Stewart; James S Brown; Janis E Hulla; Motria Caudill; Andrea L Clements; Amanda Kaufman; Alison J Parker; Martha Keating; David Balshaw; Kevin Garrahan; Laureen Burton; Sheila Batka; Vijay S Limaye; Pertti J Hakkinen; Bob Thompson
Journal:  Atmosphere (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Development and Evaluation of A Novel and Cost-Effective Approach for Low-Cost NO₂ Sensor Drift Correction.

Authors:  Li Sun; Dane Westerdahl; Zhi Ning
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Comparing Building and Neighborhood-Scale Variability of CO₂ and O₃ to Inform Deployment Considerations for Low-Cost Sensor System Use.

Authors:  Ashley Collier-Oxandale; Evan Coffey; Jacob Thorson; Jill Johnston; Michael Hannigan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Performance Evaluation and Community Application of Low-Cost Sensors for Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide.

Authors:  Rachelle M Duvall; Russell W Long; Melinda R Beaver; Keith G Kronmiller; Michael L Wheeler; James J Szykman
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Quantifying Neighborhood-Scale Spatial Variations of Ozone at Open Space and Urban Sites in Boulder, Colorado Using Low-Cost Sensor Technology.

Authors:  Lucy Cheadle; Lauren Deanes; Kira Sadighi; Joanna Gordon Casey; Ashley Collier-Oxandale; Michael Hannigan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-10       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.