Literature DB >> 24579674

Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.

Christopher A Rowland1, Edward L DeLosh.   

Abstract

The testing effect refers to the retention benefit conferred by prior retrieval of information from memory. Although the testing effect is a robust phenomenon, a common assumption is that reliable memory benefits only emerge after long retention intervals of days or weeks. The present study focused on potential test-induced retention benefits for brief retention intervals on the order of minutes and tens of seconds. Participants in four experiments studied lists of words. Some of the items were subjected to an initial cued recall test, and others were re-presented for additional study. Free recall tests were administered in each experiment following retention intervals ranging from 30 s to 8 min. When initial retrieval practice was successful (Experiments 1 through 3), or feedback compensated for unsuccessful retrieval (Experiment 4), significant testing effects emerged at all retention intervals. Results are discussed in the context of a bifurcated item-distribution model and highlight the importance of initial test performance and the type of analysis employed when examining testing effect data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delay; Episodic memory; Retention interval; Retrieval practice; Testing effect

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24579674     DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2014.889710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  16 in total

1.  Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure.

Authors:  William J Hopper; David E Huber
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

Review 2.  A dual memory theory of the testing effect.

Authors:  Timothy C Rickard; Steven C Pan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

3.  Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.

Authors:  Thomas C Toppino; Melissa H LaVan; Ryan T Iaconelli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10

4.  Retrieval-based skill learning: testing promotes the acquisition of scientific experimentation skills.

Authors:  Tobias Tempel; Katrin Kaufmann; Johanna Kranz; Andrea Möller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-31

5.  The Roles of Retrieval Practice Versus Errorless Learning in Strengthening Lexical Access in Aphasia.

Authors:  Julia Schuchard; Erica L Middleton
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Word repetition and retrieval practice effects in aphasia: Evidence for use-dependent learning in lexical access.

Authors:  Julia Schuchard; Erica L Middleton
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Age-Related Decreases in the Retrieval Practice Effect Directly Relate to Changes in Alpha-Beta Oscillations.

Authors:  Catherine-Noémie Alexandrina Guran; Nora Alicia Herweg; Nico Bunzeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Testing effects in mixed- versus pure-list designs.

Authors:  Christopher A Rowland; Megan K Littrell-Baez; Amanda E Sensenig; Edward L DeLosh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-08

9.  Optimising word learning in post-secondary students with Developmental Language Disorder: The roles of retrieval difficulty and retrieval success during training.

Authors:  Katherine R Gordon; Karla K McGregor; Timothy Arbisi-Kelm
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 1.820

10.  Retrieval practice facilitation of family psychoeducation in people with early psychosis.

Authors:  J Daniel Ragland; Xiaonan L Liu; Ashley B Williams; Laura M Tully; Tara A Niendam; Cameron S Carter; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.