| Literature DB >> 24578981 |
Monika Banaszkiewicz1, Maria Constantinou1, Michał Pietrusiński1, Lukasz Kępczyński1, Adam Jędrzejczyk2, Marek Rożniecki3, Piotr Marks4, Bogdan Kałużewski1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Urinary bladder carcinoma ranks the fourth position in malignancy incidence rates in men (6.1%) and the 17th position in women (1.6%). In general, neoplastic diseases should be approached from two perspectives: prevention with implementation of prophylactic measures and early diagnostics. Prophylactics is possible in the preclinical phase of neoplasm, being both justified and plausible in patients from high-risk groups. Thus, it is particularly important to select such groups, not only by referring to environmental carcinogenic factors (occupational and extra-occupational) but also from genetic predisposition, which may be conductive for neoplasm formation. The mutations / polymorphisms of CHEK2 and CYP1B1 genes predispose to neoplasm via multiorgan mechanisms, while the human papilloma virus (HPV) may participate in the neoplastic transformation as an environmental factor.Entities:
Keywords: CHEK2; CYP1B1; HPV; histological malignancy grade; urinary bladder cancer
Year: 2013 PMID: 24578981 PMCID: PMC3921859 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2013.01.art7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cent European J Urol ISSN: 2080-4806
Demographical and clinical characteristics of patients group with urinary bladder cancer with risk factors data
| Noumber of patients | 131 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | Females | 16 |
| Males | 115 | |
| Age at diagnosis | mean ±s.d.: (max–min) | 66.4 ±10.8 (32–88) |
| Smoking | Smokers | 120 |
| Non–smokers | 11 | |
| Occupational exposure | Positive | 56 |
| Negative | 75 | |
| Stage | Ta | 77 |
| T1 | 31 | |
| T2 | 20 | |
| T3 | 2 | |
| T4 | 1 | |
| Grading | G1 | 69 |
| G2 | 39 | |
| G3 | 23 |
Results of molecular, cytogenetic and virological testings
| Grading | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | G2 | G3 | ||
| CHEK2 mutations: | I157T | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| 1100delC | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| IVS2 +1G > A | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 2 | |
| CYP1B1 variant | G/G | 33 | 14 | 9 |
| G/T | 26 | 21 | 10 | |
| T/T | 10 | 4 | 4 | |
| Total | 69 | 39 | 23 | |
| Oncogenic HPV | Positive | 14 | 13 | 9 |
| Negative | 53 | 23 | 11 | |
| Total | 67 | 36 | 20 | |
| Not–performed | 2 | 3 | 3 | |
| UroVysion | Positive | 25 | 23 | 20 |
| Negative | 28 | 5 | 1 | |
| Total | 53 | 28 | 21 | |
| Not–performed | 16 | 11 | 2 | |
Figure 1The percent of examined patients with concomitance of HPV infection and mutations of studied genes (red color) and without such concomitance (green color) in patients with determined tumor grading.
Figure 2Model of response to DNA damage in early carcinogenesis based on ATM/ATR path activation – modified.