Literature DB >> 24578806

Sedoanalgesia with midazolam and fentanyl citrate controls probe pain during prostate biopsy by transrectal ultrasound.

Fábio Hissachi Tsuji1, Renato Caretta Chambó1, Aparecido Donizeti Agostinho2, José Carlos Souza Trindade Filho2, Carlos Márcio Nóbrega de Jesus2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the pain intensity of patients administered midazolam and fentanyl citrate before undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a study in patients with different indications for prostate biopsy in whom 5 mg of midazolam and 50 µg of fentanyl citrate was administered intravenously 3 minutes before the procedure. After biopsy, pain was assessed by use of a visual analogue scale (VAS) in three stages: VAS 1, during probe introduction; VAS 2, during needle penetration into prostate tissue; and VAS 3, in the weeks following the exam. Pain intensity at these different times was tested with stratification by age, race, education, prostate volume, rebiopsy, and anxiety before biopsy. Pain was ranked according to the following scores: 0 (no pain), 1-3 (mild pain), 4-7 (moderate pain), and 8-10 (severe pain). Statistical analysis was performed by using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon two-tailed tests with a significance of 5%.
RESULTS: Pain intensity was not influenced by any risk factors. The mean VAS 1 score was 1.95±1.98, the mean VAS 2 score was 2.73±2.55, and the mean VAS 3 score was 0.3±0.9, showing greater pain at the time of needle penetration than in other situations (VAS 2>VAS 1>VAS 3, p=0.0013, p=0.0001, respectively). Seventy-five percent of patients reported a VAS pain scale of less than 3.1 or mild pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous sedation and analgesia with midazolam and fentanyl citrate is a good method for reducing pain caused by prostate biopsy, even during probe insertion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia and analgesia; Needle biopsy; Pain measurement; Prostate

Year:  2014        PMID: 24578806      PMCID: PMC3935066          DOI: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.2.106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Urol        ISSN: 2005-6737


  29 in total

1.  Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  [Periprostatic anaesthesic infiltration for prostatic biopsy: a prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-controlled study].

Authors:  Gonzalo Valero; E U Roxana González
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.994

3.  Three different techniques for administering analgesia during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a comparative study.

Authors:  Volkan Izol; Bulent Soyupak; Gulsah Seydaoglu; I Atilla Aridogan; Zuhtu Tansug
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 4.  Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Carol DeSantis; Katherine Virgo; Kevin Stein; Angela Mariotto; Tenbroeck Smith; Dexter Cooper; Ted Gansler; Catherine Lerro; Stacey Fedewa; Chunchieh Lin; Corinne Leach; Rachel Spillers Cannady; Hyunsoon Cho; Steve Scoppa; Mark Hachey; Rebecca Kirch; Ahmedin Jemal; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  The acceptability of transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsy without anaesthesia.

Authors:  A M Westenberg; E H Cossar; L B Lorimer; J P Costello
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1999-06-25

6.  A comparative study among three techniques of general anesthesia for ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Ricardo Antônio Guimarães Barbosa; Camerine Domingues da Silva; Mary Yumi Takei Torniziello; Luciana Mendes de Olivera Cerri; Maria José Carvalho Carmona; Luiz Marcelo Sá Malbouisson
Journal:  Rev Bras Anestesiol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.964

7.  Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  M S Soloway; C Obek
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies--true morbidity and patient acceptance.

Authors:  G N Collins; S N Lloyd; M Hehir; G B McKelvie
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1993-04

9.  A nomogram for predicting a positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy session.

Authors:  Ernesto Lopez-Corona; Makoto Ohori; Peter T Scardino; Victor E Reuter; Mithat Gonen; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Side effects and patient acceptability of transrectal biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  R Clements; O U Aideyan; G J Griffiths; W B Peeling
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of patient position on pain scales during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Yeong Uk Kim; Yoon Seob Ji; Young Hwii Ko; Phil Hyun Song
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-06-01

2.  What is the ideal core number for ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Renato Caretta Chambó; Fábio Hissachi Tsuji; Flávio de Oliveira Lima; Hamilto Akihissa Yamamoto; Carlos Márcio Nóbrega de Jesus
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-11-04

3.  A comparison of pain control and complications using three different ways of anesthesia in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Hamid Mazdak; Amir Mohamad Abtahi; Fatemeh Momeni; Mohammad Hossein Izadpanahi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.852

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.