| Literature DB >> 24578700 |
Marzia Scarpari1, Marta Punelli1, Valeria Scala1, Marco Zaccaria1, Chiara Nobili2, Matteo Ludovici3, Emanuela Camera3, Anna A Fabbri1, Massimo Reverberi1, Corrado Fanelli1.
Abstract
In some filamentous fungi, the pathways related to the oxidative stress and oxylipins production are involved both in the process of host-recognition and in the pathogenic phase. In fact, recent studies have shown that the production of oxylipins in filamentous fungi, yeasts and chromists is also related to the development of the organism itself and to mechanisms of communication with the host at the cellular level. The oxylipins, also produced by the host during defense reactions, are able to induce sporulation and to regulate the biosynthesis of mycotoxins in several pathogenic fungi. In A. flavus, the oxylipins play a crucial role as signals for regulating the biosynthesis of aflatoxins, the conidiogenesis and the formation of sclerotia. To investigate the involvement of an oxylipins based cross-talk into Z. mays and A. flavus interaction, we analyzed the oxylipins profile of the wild type strain and of three mutants of A. flavus that are deleted at the Aflox1 gene level also during maize kernel invasion. A lipidomic approach has been addressed through the use of LC-ToF-MS, followed by a statistical analysis of the principal components (PCA). The results showed the existence of a difference between the oxylipins profile generated by the WT and the mutants onto challenged maize. In relation to this, aflatoxin synthesis which is largely hampered in vitro, is intriguingly restored. These results highlight the important role of maize oxylipin in driving secondary metabolism in A. flavus.Entities:
Keywords: aflatoxins; lipidomic; lipoxygenase; maize kernels; reverse genetic
Year: 2014 PMID: 24578700 PMCID: PMC3936598 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00074
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Af.
Figure 2Phenotypic comparison among Af.
Figure 3Gel blot analysis of Af Genomic DNA was isolated from the WT strain, the arginine auxotroph AFC-1 strain and gene replacement transformants (Aflox1Δ). The blot was hybridized at 65°C with a 0.65-Kb argD DIG-labeled probe. Lane 1 DIG-labeled λhindIII (Roche) used as molecular weight marker; lane 2 EcoRI-restricted genomic DNA of A. flavus WT strain; lane 3 EcoRI-restricted genomic DNA of A. flavus AFC-1; lane 4–6 EcoRI-restricted genomic DNA of Aflox1Δ strains (clone number 3 out of a set of 20 transformants screened); lane 7 argD 0.65 Kb PCR fragment.
Figure 4Af Results are the mean (± SE) of a total of six replications deriving from two independent experiments.
Figure 5(A) LOX activity (U/mg protein) measured as diene conjugates formation at 234 mn in AFC-1 and Aflox1 deleted strains in PDB at 30°C at different days after inoculation (3–14 dpi). (B) HPODE synthesis (expressed as relative abundance) in AFC-1 and Aflox1 deleted strains in PDB grown at 30°C at different days after inoculation (3–14 dpi). Results are the mean (±SE) of a total of six replications deriving from two independent experiments.
Figure 6Aflatoxin (AFB1) production measured by HPLC in culture filtrate (ppb), in the AFC-1 and Af Results are the mean (±SE) of a total of six replications deriving from two independent experiments.
Figure 7Aflatoxins biosynthesis measured by HPLC (ppm) in viable seeds of maize by AFC-1, Af Results are the mean (± SE) of a total of six replications deriving from two independent experiments.
Figure 8Chromatogram (of the lipid compound at 311.2983 m/z corresponding to HPODE) in overlap mode deriving by LC-TOF analysis of lipid extract of maize kernels non-inoculated or inoculated with AFC-1 and the 3 deleted Af.
Figure 9Results in the production of (A) di-HODE and (B) HPODE in maize inoculated with the mutant strains or with AFC-1, 3, 7, 10, and 14 days post inoculation, compared to non-inoculated maize. The results represent the average of six repetitions arising from two different experiments ± SE.