| Literature DB >> 24578670 |
Krzysztof Skowron1, Justyna Bauza-Kaszewska2, Zbigniew Dobrzański3, Zbigniew Paluszak2, Karolina Jadwiga Skowron2.
Abstract
Fish meals, added to feeds as a source of protein, may contain pathogenic bacteria. Therefore, effective methods for their sanitizing, such as UV-C radiation, are needed to minimize the epidemiological risk. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of UV-C radiation on the sanitary state of fish meals. The research materials included salmon and cod meals. Samples of the fish meals were inoculated with suspensions of Salmonella, E. coli, enterococci, and C. sporogenes spores and exposed to the following surface UV-C fluencies: 0-400 J·m⁻² for bacteria and 0-5000 J·m⁻² for spores. For the vegetative forms, the highest theoretical lethal UV-C dose, ranging from 670.99 to 688.36 J·m⁻² depending on the meal type, was determined for Salmonella. The lowest UV-C fluency of 363.34-363.95 J·m⁻² was needed for the inactivation of Enterococcus spp. Spores were considerably more resistant, and the UV-C doses necessary for inactivation were 159571.1 J·m⁻² in salmon meal and 66836.9 J·m⁻² in cod meal. The application of UV-C radiation for the sanitization of fish meals proved to be a relatively effective method for vegetative forms of bacteria but was practically ineffective for spores.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24578670 PMCID: PMC3918690 DOI: 10.1155/2014/928094
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Exposition times of inoculated samples of fish meal needed to obtain the intended UV-C dose in case of a distance of 1 m between UV source and probe.
| Time of exposition | Dose (J·m−2) |
|---|---|
| 0 s | 0 |
| 4 s | 10 |
| 11 s | 25 |
| 22 s | 50 |
| 33 s | 75 |
| 43 s | 100 |
| 2 min 28 s | 400 |
| 7 min 15 s | 1000 |
| 18 min 7 s | 2500 |
| 36 min 14 s | 5000 |
Changes in the number of Salmonella depending on the surface density of the UV-C radiation dose.
| UV-C dose (J·m−2) | Number of | |
|---|---|---|
| Type of fish meal | ||
| Salmon | Cod | |
| Control | 15.0 × 105 | 2.5 × 105 |
| 10 | 7.5 × 104 | 2.5 × 105 |
| 25 | 2.5 × 105 | 2.5 × 105 |
| 50 | 6.5 × 104 | 4.5 × 104 |
| 75 | 2.5 × 104 | 20.0 × 103 |
| 100 | 2.5 × 103 | 4.5 × 103 |
| 400 | 2.5 × 102 | 2.5 × 102 |
Changes in the number of Enterococcus spp. depending on the surface density of the UV-C radiation dose.
| UV-C dose (J·m−2) | Number of enterococci (MPN·g−1) | |
|---|---|---|
| Type of fish meal | ||
| Salmon | Cod | |
| Control | 2.5 × 105 | 2.5 × 106 |
| 10 | 9.5 × 103 | 4.5 × 104 |
| 25 | 2.5 × 103 | 4.5 × 103 |
| 50 | 2.5 × 103 | 4.5 × 103 |
| 75 | 2.5 × 102 | 4.5 × 102 |
| 100 | 9.5 × 101 | 2.5 × 102 |
| 400 | n.d.* | n.d. |
*n.d.: not detected.
Changes in the number of E. coli depending on the surface density of the UV-C radiation dose.
| UV-C dose (J·m−2) | Number of | |
|---|---|---|
| Type of fish meal | ||
| Salmon | Cod | |
| Control | 2.5 × 105 | 9.5 × 105 |
| 10 | 9.5 × 104 | 2.5 × 105 |
| 25 | 7.5 × 102 | 9.5 × 103 |
| 50 | 15.0 × 102 | 2.5 × 103 |
| 75 | 2.5 × 102 | 2.5 × 103 |
| 100 | 9.5 × 101 | 4.5 × 102 |
| 400 | 0.4 × 101 | 1.5 × 101 |
Changes in the number of Clostridium sporogenes spores depending on the surface density of the UV-C radiation dose.
| UV-C dose (J·m−2) | Number of | |
|---|---|---|
| Type of fish meal | ||
| Salmon | Cod | |
| Control | 1.32 × 106 | 1.83 × 106 |
| 100 | 3.23 × 106 | 5.80 × 106 |
| 400 | 1.30 × 106 | 3.37 × 106 |
| 1000 | 1.34 × 106 | 1.70 × 106 |
| 2500 | 1.08 × 106 | 1.67 × 106 |
| 5000 | 1.22 × 106 | 1.07 × 106 |
Figure 1Regression lines describing inactivation kinetics of Salmonella spp.
Figure 2Regression lines describing inactivation kinetics of E. coli.
Figure 3Regression lines describing inactivation kinetics of Enterococcus spp.
Parameters describing inactivation kinetics of the studied bacteria in fish meal as affected by UV-C radiation.
| Type of meal | Bacteria | Theoretical lethal dose (J·m−2) | Inactivation rate (logMPN×(J·m−1)) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salmon |
| 670.99A,a ( | 0.008A,a ( | 128.21A,a ( |
|
| 477.37B,b ( | 0.010A,a,b ( | 103.09A,b ( | |
|
| 363.34C,c ( | 0.011A,a,b ( | 91.74A,c ( | |
| Spores of | 159571.1D,d ( | 0.000039B,c ( | 25641.0B,e
( | |
|
| ||||
| Cod |
| 688.36A,a ( | 0.008A,a ( | 133.33A,a ( |
|
| 413.14B,b ( | 0.010A,a,b ( | 104.17A,b ( | |
|
| 363.95C,c ( | 0.012A,b ( | 80.65A,d ( | |
| Spores of | 66836.9E,e ( | 0.000097C,d ( | 10309.3C,f ( | |
A, B, C,…: highly statistically significant differences at P ≤ 0.01.
a, b, c,…: statistically significant differences at P ≤ 0.05.
*Standard deviation.
Figure 4Regression lines describing inactivation kinetics of Clostridium sporogenes spores.