Literature DB >> 24578581

Intensive Reading Remediation in Grade 2 or 3: Are There Effects a Decade Later?

Benita A Blachman1, Christopher Schatschneider2, Jack M Fletcher3, Maria S Murray4, Kristen A Munger5, Michael G Vaughn6.   

Abstract

Despite data supporting the benefits of early reading interventions, there has been little evaluation of the long-term educational impact of these interventions, with most follow-up studies lasting less than two years (Suggate, 2010). This study evaluated reading outcomes more than a decade after the completion of an 8-month reading intervention using a randomized design with second and third graders selected on the basis of poor word-level skills (Blachman et al., 2004). Fifty-eight (84%) of the original 69 participants took part in the study. The treatment group demonstrated a moderate to small effect size advantage on reading and spelling measures over the comparison group. There were statistically significant differences with moderate effect sizes between treatment and comparison groups on standardized measures of word recognition (i.e., Woodcock Basic Skills Cluster, d = 0.53; Woodcock Word Identification, d = 0.62), the primary, but not exclusive, focus of the intervention. Statistical tests on other reading and spelling measures did not reach thresholds for statistical significance. Patterns in the data related to other educational outcomes, such as high school completion, favored the treatment participants, although differences were not significant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  longitudinal effects; reading difficulties; reading intervention; remediation

Year:  2014        PMID: 24578581      PMCID: PMC3933175          DOI: 10.1037/a0033663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Educ Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0663


  26 in total

1.  Speed of processing of the visual-orthographic and auditory-phonological systems in adult dyslexics: the contribution of "asynchrony" to word recognition deficits.

Authors:  Zvia Breznitz; Maya Misra
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Why what we teach depends on when: grade and reading intervention modality moderate effect size.

Authors:  Sebastian Paul Suggate
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2010-11

3.  Severity of emotional and behavioral problems among poor and typical readers.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mayfield Arnold; David B Goldston; Adam K Walsh; Beth A Reboussin; Stephanie Sergent Daniel; Enith Hickman; Frank B Wood
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2005-04

4.  Persistence of phonological processing deficits in college students with dyslexia who have age-appropriate reading skills.

Authors:  A M Wilson; N K Lesaux
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

5.  Protecting adolescents from harm. Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health.

Authors:  M D Resnick; P S Bearman; R W Blum; K E Bauman; K M Harris; J Jones; J Tabor; T Beuhring; R E Sieving; M Shew; M Ireland; L H Bearinger; J R Udry
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-09-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition.

Authors:  D L Share
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1995-05

7.  Continuity between childhood dyslexia and adult reading.

Authors:  H S Scarborough
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1984-08

8.  Reading comprehension skills of young adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia.

Authors:  Marilyn J Ransby; H Lee Swanson
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

9.  Development of left occipitotemporal systems for skilled reading in children after a phonologically- based intervention.

Authors:  Bennett A Shaywitz; Sally E Shaywitz; Benita A Blachman; Kenneth R Pugh; Robert K Fulbright; Pawel Skudlarski; W Einar Mencl; R Todd Constable; John M Holahan; Karen E Marchione; Jack M Fletcher; G Reid Lyon; John C Gore
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Persistence of literacy problems: spelling in adolescence and at mid-life.

Authors:  B Maughan; J Messer; S Collishaw; A Pickles; M Snowling; W Yule; M Rutter
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 8.982

View more
  6 in total

1.  Executive Functioning Deficits Increase Kindergarten Children's Risk for Reading and Mathematics Difficulties in First Grade.

Authors:  Paul L Morgan; Hui Li; George Farkas; Michael Cook; Wik Hung Pun; Marianne M Hillemeier
Journal:  Contemp Educ Psychol       Date:  2016-03-07

2.  The Critical Role of Word Reading as a Predictor of Response to Intervention.

Authors:  Sharon Vaughn; Philip Capin; Nancy Scammacca; Greg Roberts; Paul Cirino; Jack M Fletcher
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2019-12-06

3.  How the Science of Reading Informs 21st-Century Education.

Authors:  Yaacov Petscher; Sonia Q Cabell; Hugh W Catts; Donald L Compton; Barbara R Foorman; Sara A Hart; Christopher J Lonigan; Beth M Phillips; Christopher Schatschneider; Laura M Steacy; Nicole Patton Terry; Richard K Wagner
Journal:  Read Res Q       Date:  2020-09-06

4.  A Commentary on Bowers (2020) and the Role of Phonics Instruction in Reading.

Authors:  Jack M Fletcher; Robert Savage; Sharon Vaughn
Journal:  Educ Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-11-05

5.  The Not-So-Simple View of Writing in Struggling Readers/Writers.

Authors:  Yusra Ahmed; Shawn Kent; Paul T Cirino; Milena Keller-Margulis
Journal:  Read Writ Q       Date:  2021-08-04

6.  An evaluation of systematized phonics on reading proficiency in Swedish second grade poor readers: Effects on pseudoword and sight word reading skills.

Authors:  Maria Levlin; Cecilia Nakeva von Mentzer
Journal:  Dyslexia       Date:  2020-09-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.