Literature DB >> 24578411

Mechanical cardiac support in children with congenital heart disease with intention to bridge to heart transplantation†.

Fabrizio De Rita1, Asif Hasan2, Simon Haynes3, David Crossland4, Richard Kirk4, Lee Ferguson3, Edward Peng2, Massimo Griselli2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A significant number of children affected by congenital heart disease (CHD) develop heart failure early or late after surgery, and heart transplantation (OHTx) remains the last treatment option. Due to shortage of donor organs in paediatric group, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is now routinely applied as bridging strategy to increase survival on the waiting list for OTHx. We sought to assess the impact of MCS as intention to bridge to OHTx in patients with CHD less than 16 years of age.
METHODS: From 1998 to 2013, 106 patients received 113 episodes of MCS with paracorporeal devices as intention to bridge to OHTx. Twenty-nine had CHD, 15 (52%) with two-ventricle (Group A) and 14 (48%) with single-ventricle physiology (Group B). In Group A, 5 children had venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO), 6 left ventricular assist device (LVAD), 2 biventricular assist device (BIVAD), 1 VA ECMO followed by BIVAD and 1 BIVAD followed by VA ECMO. In Group B, VA ECMO was used in 7 children, univentricular assist device (UVAD) changed to VA ECMO in 4, UVAD in 2 and surgical conversion to two-ventricles physiology with BIVAD support changed to VA ECMO in 1.
RESULTS: Twenty-one of 29 (72%) children survived to recovery/OHTx. Seven of 29 (59%) survived to discharge. In Group A, 11/15 (73%) survived to recovery/OHTx and 9/15 (60%) survived to discharge. Four of 15 (27%) died awaiting OHTx. One child had graft failure requiring VA ECMO and was bridged successfully to retransplantation. One child dying after OHTx had acute rejection, was supported with VA ECMO and then BIVAD but did not recover. One patient had an unsuccessful second run on BIVAD 1 year after recovery from VA ECMO. In Group B, 10/14 (71%) survived to recovery/OHTx and 8/14 (57%) survived to discharge. Four of 14 (29%) died awaiting OHTx. Of deaths after OHTx, 1 occurred intraoperatively and 1 was consequent to graft failure and had an unsuccessful second run with VA ECMO.
CONCLUSIONS: Children with CHD can be successfully bridged with MCS to heart transplantation. Single-ventricle circulation compared with biventricular physiology does not increase the risk of death before transplant or before hospital discharge.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital heart disease; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenator; Heart transplantation; Mechanical circulatory support

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24578411     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  8 in total

1.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in the first 24 hours following pediatric heart transplantation: Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes.

Authors:  Justin Godown; David W Bearl; Cary Thurm; Matt Hall; Brian Feingold; Jonathan H Soslow; Bret A Mettler; Andrew H Smith; Elizabeth L Profita; Tajinder P Singh; Debra A Dodd
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2019-04-11

2.  Influence of Transplant Center Procedural Volume on Survival Outcomes of Heart Transplantation for Children Bridged with Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Alex Hsieh; Dmitry Tumin; Patrick I McConnell; Mark Galantowicz; Joseph D Tobias; Don Hayes
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Mechanical circulatory support in pediatrics.

Authors:  Fabrizio Gandolfo; Fabrizio De Rita; Asif Hasan; Massimo Griselli
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-09

Review 4.  Current approaches to device implantation in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients.

Authors:  Jacob R Miller; Timothy S Lancaster; Pirooz Eghtesady
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2015-03-03

Review 5.  Ventricular assist device use in congenital heart disease with a comparison to heart transplant.

Authors:  Jacob R Miller; Pirooz Eghtesady
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.744

Review 6.  Heart transplantation for adults with congenital heart disease: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Hikaru Matsuda; Hajime Ichikawa; Takayoshi Ueno; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-04-24

Review 7.  "Functionally" univentricular hearts: impact of pre-natal diagnosis.

Authors:  Antonio Francesco Corno
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 8.  Mechanical Circulatory Support for Single Ventricle Failure.

Authors:  Massimo Griselli; Raina Sinha; Subin Jang; Gianluigi Perri; Iki Adachi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-08-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.