PURPOSE: To evaluate the 7 Tesla (T) MRI of the carotid arteries, as quantitatively compared with 3T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 7T MRI of the carotid arteries was performed in six healthy subjects and in two patients with carotid stenosis. The healthy group was scanned at 3T and at 7T, using current coil setups at both field strengths. T1 and T2 values of the normal carotid vessel wall were assessed at both field strengths. B1 (+) maps and signal to noise ratio (SNR) maps were obtained, as well as T1 weighted images with a resolution as high as 0.4 × 0.4 × 1.5 mm(3) . RESULTS: The T1 of the normal carotid vessel wall was found to be 1227 ± 47 ms at 3T and 1628 ± 130 ms at 7T, while a T2 of 55 ± 11 ms at 3T and 46 ± 4 ms at 7T was found. A twofold average gain in SNR at the carotid arteries was found with 7T. T1 weighted images showed an increased SNR at 7T for all subjects. CONCLUSION: Evaluation between 3T and 7T carotid MRI with optimized setups at both field strengths showed improved SNR at 7T, an increase in vessel wall T1 and a decrease in vessel wall T2.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the 7 Tesla (T) MRI of the carotid arteries, as quantitatively compared with 3T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 7T MRI of the carotid arteries was performed in six healthy subjects and in two patients with carotid stenosis. The healthy group was scanned at 3T and at 7T, using current coil setups at both field strengths. T1 and T2 values of the normal carotid vessel wall were assessed at both field strengths. B1 (+) maps and signal to noise ratio (SNR) maps were obtained, as well as T1 weighted images with a resolution as high as 0.4 × 0.4 × 1.5 mm(3) . RESULTS: The T1 of the normal carotid vessel wall was found to be 1227 ± 47 ms at 3T and 1628 ± 130 ms at 7T, while a T2 of 55 ± 11 ms at 3T and 46 ± 4 ms at 7T was found. A twofold average gain in SNR at the carotid arteries was found with 7T. T1 weighted images showed an increased SNR at 7T for all subjects. CONCLUSION: Evaluation between 3T and 7T carotid MRI with optimized setups at both field strengths showed improved SNR at 7T, an increase in vessel wall T1 and a decrease in vessel wall T2.
Authors: Chengcheng Zhu; Henrik Haraldsson; Bing Tian; Karl Meisel; Nerissa Ko; Michael Lawton; John Grinstead; Sinyeob Ahn; Gerhard Laub; Christopher Hess; David Saloner Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-03-05 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Sebastian Schmitter; Gregor Adriany; Matt Waks; Steen Moeller; Maria Aristova; Alireza Vali; Edward J Auerbach; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Kamil Ugurbil; Susanne Schnell Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-03-18 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: R Blankena; R Kleinloog; B H Verweij; P van Ooij; B Ten Haken; P R Luijten; G J E Rinkel; J J M Zwanenburg Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Eoin A Murphy; Rose A Ross; Robert G Jones; Stephen J Gandy; Nicolas Aristokleous; Marco Salsano; Jonathan R Weir-McCall; Shona Matthew; John Graeme Houston Journal: Cardiovasc Eng Technol Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 2.495
Authors: Bram F Coolen; Claudia Calcagno; Pim van Ooij; Zahi A Fayad; Gustav J Strijkers; Aart J Nederveen Journal: MAGMA Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Giuseppe Barisano; Farshid Sepehrband; Samantha Ma; Kay Jann; Ryan Cabeen; Danny J Wang; Arthur W Toga; Meng Law Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 3.629