Literature DB >> 24577823

Reliability of long vs short COI markers in identification of forensically important flies.

Sanaa M Aly1.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the reliability of short and long cytochrome oxidase I gene fragment (COI) in identification of forensically important Diptera from Egypt and China.
METHODS: We analyzed 50 specimens belonging to 18 species. The two investigated markers were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by direct sequencing. Nucleotide sequence divergences were calculated using the Kimura two-parameter (K2P) distance model and neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic trees.
RESULTS: Although both tested fragments showed an overlap between intra and interspecific variations, long marker had greater completeness of monophyletic separation with high bootstrap support. Moreover, NJ tree based on the long fragment clustered species more in accordance with their taxonomic classification than that based on the short fragment.
CONCLUSION: In dipterous identification, it is recommended to use the long COI marker due to its greater reliability and safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24577823      PMCID: PMC3944415          DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2014.55.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Croat Med J        ISSN: 0353-9504            Impact factor:   1.351


Necrophagous insects can serve as a valuable source of information for estimation of minimum post-mortem interval (PMI) in legal medicine. Most suitable for forensic purposes are species from the order Diptera (eg, Calliphoridae, Muscidae, and Sarcophagidae) (1-4). In PMI estimation, an important initial step is correct identification of these insects, which may be difficult by using the traditional morphology-based approach (5,6), because several forensically important fly species can hardly be distinguished morphologically (7-9). The limitations of morphological method can be overcome by gene sequences analysis, a fast and accurate method of species identification. Molecular analysis requires small tissue samples and is relatively insensitive to preservation conditions (1,10). Different mitochondrial (mt) and nuclear (nu) DNA markers are investigated as forensic tools. However, mtDNA is preferred because it can be easily extracted even from small or degraded samples (10). In addition, because of its strictly maternal inheritance and lack of genetic recombination, mtDNA haplotype is a good candidate for evolutionary and population genetics study. Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences are a rapid and powerful tool for accurate identification of species across various taxa (7,11-14). Although COI has been extensively studied by forensic entomologists, resulting in a vast amount of DNA data, there is little agreement as to which portion of the gene needs to be sequenced. Although the 5′ end of COI is also the site of the proposed universal animal DNA “barcode” (11) and it has been successfully used in the identification of many blowfly species (12), this approach cannot identify some closely related species (12,15). Therefore, to optimize discrimination power between closely related species some authors suggested multi-gene approach (16,17). Surprisingly, a recent study using this approach revealed that phylogenetic tree based on COI fragment was similar to that based on 3 different gene fragments (16). Fragments of the COI sequence that show low sequence divergence within species but high divergences among species can be employed as taxon “barcodes,” and unknown samples can be accurately grouped to species with reference sequences of the “barcode library” (14,18,19). Therefore, it is paramount to evaluate not only discrimination power of these COI fragments between closely related species but also between species belonging to more than one family, because in a database an unknown sample will be compared to all reference samples. In the absence of an appropriate reference sample, unknown samples will simply group with the most closely matched reference sample (20). Thus, it is important to confirm that the investigated marker will not only be correctly assigned to a species but also that it will be in accordance with the traditional morphological classification. Therefore, we evaluated the discrimination power of the short (272-bp) COI fragment in the identification of the most forensically relevant flies (Calliphoridae, Sarcophagidae, and Muscidae) originating from Egypt and China in comparison to the long (1173-bp) COI fragment, and aimed to gather genetic data on common forensically important Diptera.

Materials and methods

Samples

Fifty adult flies belonging to 18 species including 10 species of Calliphoridae, 5 species of Sarcophagidae, and 3 species of Muscidae were collected during two consecutive years (1/2011 to 12/2012). This study was conducted in both Forensic Medicine & Clinical Toxicology department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt and National Key Laboratory, Basic Medical School, Central south University, Changsha, China. All samples were collected using traps baited with animal remains. Collected flies were trapped at different locations in Egypt and China (Table 1). Samples were identified by entomologists based on traditional morphological characteristics (21-25). All samples were subsequently stored in 70% ethanol at -20°C. For comparison, other sequences were retrieved from the NCBI database ().
Table 1

Specimens used in the study

SpeciesCode in neighbor-joining treeLocationAccession number
Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius,1794)
CmC1
Changsha, China
KC249623
KC249673

CmC2
Changsha, China
KC249624
KC249674

CmE3
Ismailia, Egypt
KC249625
KC249675

CmE4
Ismailia, Egypt
KC249626
KC249676

Cm5

JX187372*
C. albiceps (Wiedemann, 1819)
CalbE1
Alkantra shark, Egypt
KC249627
KC249677

CalbE2
Alkantra shark, Egypt
KC249628
KC249678

CalbE3
Alkantra shark, Egypt
KC249629
KC249679

CalbE4
Ismailia, Egypt
KC249630
KC249680

CalbE5
Ismailia, Egypt
KC249631
KC249681

Calb6

AF083657*
C. rufifacies (Macquart, 1842)
CrC1
Changsha, China
KC249632
KC249682

CrC2
Changsha, China
KC249633
KC249683

Cr3

JX187383*
C. nigripes (Aubertin, 1932)
CnC1
Changsha, China
KC249634
KC249684

CnC2
Changsha, China
KC249635
KC249685

CnC3
Guangzhou, China
KC249636
KC249686

CnC4
Guangzhou, China
KC249637
KC249687
Aldrichina graham (Aldrich, 1930)
AgC1
Changsha, China
KC249638
KC249688

AgC2
Guangzhou, China
KC249639
KC249689
Lucilia sericata (Meigen, 1826)
LsC1
Changsha, China
KC249640
KC249690

LsC2
Changsha, China
KC249641
KC249691
L. bazini (Seguy, 1934)
LbC1
Zhangjiajie China
KC249642
KC249692

LbC2
Zhangjiajie China
KC249643
KC249693
L. caesar (Linnaeus, 1758)
LcaC1
China
KC249644
KC249694

LcaC2
China
KC249645
KC249695
L. cuprina (Wiedemann, 1830)
LcuC1
Changsha China
KC249646
KC249696

LcuC2
Changsha China
KC249647
KC249697
L. porphyrina (Walker, 1856)
LpC1
Changsha China
KC249648
KC249698

LpC2
Changsha China
KC249649
KC249699
Musca domestica (Linnaeus, 1758)
MdE1
Alkantra shark, Egypt
KC249650
KC249700

MdE2
Ismailia Egypt
KC249651
KC249701

MdE3
Ismailia Egypt
KC249652
KC249702
M. autumnalis (De Geer, 1776)
MaC1
Changsha, China
KC249653
KC249703

MaC2
Changsha, China
KC249654
KC249704

MaE3
Ismailia, Egypt
KC249655
KC249705

MaE4
Alkantra shark, Egypt
KC249656
KC249706

MaE5
Portsaid, Egypt
KC249657
KC249707
Fannia canicularis (Linnaeus, 1761)
FcE1
Ismailia, Egypt
KC249658
KC249708

FcE2
Ismailia, Egypt
KC249659
KC249709

FcE3
Alkantra shark, Egypt
KC249660
KC249710
Sarcophaga albiceps (Meigen, 1826)
SalbC1
Changsha China
KC249661
KC249711

SalbC2
Changsha China
KC249662
KC249712
S. dux (Thompson, 1869)
SdC1
Changsha China
KC249663
KC249713

SdC2
Changsha China
KC249664
KC249714
S. Africa (Wiedemann, 1824)
SaC1
Changsha, China
KC249665
KC249715

SaC2
Xining, China
KC249666
KC249716

SaC3
Changsha, China
KC249667
KC249717

Sa4

JQ582120*
S. argyrostoma (Robineau-Desvoidy,1830)
SargyE1
Alkantra shark, Egypt
KC249668
KC249718

SargyE2
Ismailia Egypt
KC249669
KC249719

SargyE3
Ismailia Egypt
KC249670
KC249720

Sargy4

JQ582123*
S. peregrine (Robineau-Desvoidy,1830)
SperC1
Changsha, China
KC249671
KC249721
SperC2Changsha, ChinaKC249672KC249722

*GenBank accession numbers are given for previously published sequences.

Specimens used in the study *GenBank accession numbers are given for previously published sequences.

DNA extraction

MtDNA was extracted from all samples using Mini Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. To avoid possible contamination of fly DNA with DNA from ingested proteins and eggs of gut parasites, the thoracic muscle of each insect was used as the source of DNA, whereas the head and abdomen were retained for further analysis.

PCR amplification and DNA sequencing

The 272-bp COI gene fragment was amplified using the primers 5′-CAGATCGAAATTTAAATACTTC-3′ and 5′-GTATCAACATCTATTCCTAC-3′ and 1173-bp COI fragment was amplified using 5′ TACAATTTATCGCCTAAACTTCAGCC 3′ and 5′ CAGCTACTTTATGAGCTTTAGG 3′. Details of the primers and PCR condition were described in previous studies (26,27). Gel electrophoresis was used to isolate PCR products, which were then purified using QiaQuick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). Column cycle sequencing was performed on both forward and reverse strands using ABI PRISM Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit by ABI PRISM 3730 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with Big Dye terminator v. 3.1 as the sequencing agent.

Sequences analysis and phylogenetic tree construction

Analysis of DNA sequence variations, nucleotide composition, and genetic distances analysis was performed using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis v. 5.10 (MEGA) (28). Phylogenetic trees based on the 2 investigated COI sequences were constructed by neighbor-joining (NJ) method using Kimura two-parameter (K2P) model implemented in the MEGA and tested by 1000 bootstrap replicates.

Results

Both 272-bp and 1173-bp COI fragments were successfully sequenced from all 50 insects. The 272-bp and 1173-bp sequences corresponded to positions 2098-2369 and 1513-2685, respectively of Drosophila yakuba (GenBank accession number X03240). Based on 272-bp sequences, 73 were variant and 71 were parsimony-informative characters. The nucleotide composition showed much higher frequencies of adenine and thymine (31.7% and 37% of total nucleotide compositions, respectively) compared with 14.2% of cytosine and 17.1% of guanine. NJ analysis was conducted to determine the relationships between the analyzed species (Figure 1 and Table 2). All species were monophyletic with bootstrap support of 99%-100%, except M. autumnalis and F. canicularis. Both species could not be separated forming one polytypic clade with 61% support. Although Muscidae formed a distinct group with high bootstrap support (100%), 272-bp COI marker failed to distinguish between Muscidae and Fanniidae. Sarcophagidae family formed a distinct group but with low bootstrap support (19%). Calliphoridae family failed to form a distinct group. At the genus level, Lucilia formed a distinct group with 27% support. Although Aldrichina grahami belongs to Aldrichina genus, it was embedded within Lucilia group. Chrysomya group did not join directly with the other group (Lucilia) that belongs to the same family. All tested species displayed intraspecific variations from 0 to 1.5% (Table 2). The highest variation was observed in C. megacephala and S. africa at 1.5%. Although M. autumnalis samples were collected from 2 countries, 0% intraspecific variation was observed. The interspecific variations between 18 tested species varied from 1% to 14%. The minimum interspecific variations were between M. Domestica, M. autumnalis, and F. canicularis at 1%.
Figure 1

The neighbor-joining tree using Kimura’s 2-parameter model illustrating phylogenetic relationships among 18 fly species based on 272-bp cytochrome oxidase I sequences. Sample codes are as in Table 1. Numbers on branches indicate the support value. Evolutionary distance divergence scale bar is 0.01.

Table 2

Calculated intra- and interspecific divergences expressed as percentage of the analyzed 272-bp (below the diagonal) and 1173-bp (above the diagonal) cytochrome oxidase I gene fragment using neighbor-joining (NJ) approach with Kimura’s 2-parameter (K2P) model*

NoSpeciesNV1V2123456789101112131415161718
1
C. megacephala
4
0-1.5
0-1.5
-
6
8
6
11
10
9
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
13
2
C. albiceps
5
0
0-0.7
7
-
4
7
11
10
9
10
11
10
12
12
12
12
11
13
12
13
3
C. rufifacies
2
0
0-1.2
10
3
-
9
12
11
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
11
13
12
14
4
C. nigripes
4
0
0-0.5
7
5
7
-
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
12
11
14
13
14
5
A.grahami
2
0
0
12
11
11
11
-
9
8
8
8
9
14
14
14
12
12
14
13
13
6
L. bazini
2
0
0
10
8
9
8
8
-
6
7
7
7
12
12
12
11
11
12
12
12
7
L. caesar
2
0
0
8
8
8
10
9
7
-
6
6
5
11
11
10
11
12
11
12
12
8
L. cuprina
2
1
1
9
10
12
9
8
8
7
-
1
6
12
12
12
11
10
11
11
12
9
L. sericata
2
0
0
10
10
12
10
9
7
8
2
-
7
12
12
12
11
11
12
12
12
10
L. porphyrina
2
0
0
11
10
12
14
11
9
7
10
10
-
12
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
11
M. autumnalis
5
0
0-0.1
9
9
10
10
14
10
9
11
11
12
-
1
1
13
14
14
14
14
12
M. domestica
3
0-0.4
0-0.8
10
9
10
9
13
10
9
12
12
13
2
-
1
14
14
14
14
15
13
F. canicularis
3
0-0.4
0-0.6
10
8
9
9
13
10
9
11
12
13
1
1
-
13
13
13
14
14
14
S. albiceps
2
0
0
11
9
9
11
12
9
9
9
9
12
9
10
9
-
7
10
10
8
15
S. dux
2
0
0
11
6
9
8
11
7
9
8
9
12
9
9
8
7
-
9
8
8
16
S. argyrostoma
3
0-0.7
0-1
12
12
12
12
11
9
9
11
12
12
10
10
9
9
6
-
10
9
17
S. africa
3
0-1.5
0-2
12
10
9
9
10
10
9
11
12
12
12
12
12
9
7
9
-
9
18S. peregrina2001311141412911101010121312108911-

*Abbreviations: N – number of specimens; V1 – intraspecific variations within 272-bp fragment; V2 – intraspecific variations within 1173-bp fragment.

The neighbor-joining tree using Kimura’s 2-parameter model illustrating phylogenetic relationships among 18 fly species based on 272-bp cytochrome oxidase I sequences. Sample codes are as in Table 1. Numbers on branches indicate the support value. Evolutionary distance divergence scale bar is 0.01. Calculated intra- and interspecific divergences expressed as percentage of the analyzed 272-bp (below the diagonal) and 1173-bp (above the diagonal) cytochrome oxidase I gene fragment using neighbor-joining (NJ) approach with Kimura’s 2-parameter (K2P) model* *Abbreviations: N – number of specimens; V1 – intraspecific variations within 272-bp fragment; V2 – intraspecific variations within 1173-bp fragment. Based on 1173-bp sequences, 386 were variant and 372 were parsimony-informative characters. The nucleotide composition showed much higher frequencies of adenine and thymine (29.9% and 38.8%, of total nucleotide composition, respectively), compared with 15.3% of cytosine and 16.1% of guanine. All tested species were monophyletic with full bootstrap supports (Figure 2 and Table 2). Sarcophagidae formed a distinct group with 100% bootstrap support. In the Muscidae group, 2 tested families (Muscidae/Fanniidae) could be separated. Calliphoridae family failed to form a distinct group. At the genus level, Lucilia formed a distinct group with 49% support. Aldrichina grahami, belonging to the Aldrichina genus, first formed a separate group then joined with that of Lucilia with 96% support. Chrysomya formed a group with 98% support. Interestingly, Chrysomya group joined with Muscidae before joining with other Calliphoridae (Lucilia and Aldrichina). All tested species displayed intraspecific variations ranging from 0 to 2% (Table 2). The highest level was observed for S. africa at 2%. Although samples were collected from 2 countries, 0% intraspecific variations were observed for M. autumnalis. The interspecific variations between 18 tested species varied from 1% to 15%. The minimum interspecific variations were found between L. cuprina/L. sericata and M. domestica/M. autumnalis/F. canicularis at 1%.
Figure 2

The neighbor-joining tree using Kimura’s 2-parameter model illustrating phylogenetic relationships among 18 fly species based on 1173-bp cytochrome oxidase I sequences. Sample codes are as in Table 1. Numbers on branches indicate the support value. Evolutionary distance divergence scale bar is 0.01.

The neighbor-joining tree using Kimura’s 2-parameter model illustrating phylogenetic relationships among 18 fly species based on 1173-bp cytochrome oxidase I sequences. Sample codes are as in Table 1. Numbers on branches indicate the support value. Evolutionary distance divergence scale bar is 0.01.

Discussion

This study found that although both tested fragments showed an overlap between intra and interspecific variations, long marker showed greater completeness of monophyletic separation with high bootstrap support. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide molecular data on forensically important species from Egypt and China by using either short 272-bp or long 1173-bp fragment of the mt COI gene. The mt COI gene has been shown to be a major candidate gene for identification of forensically important insects (7,14,27,29). So, before using it in real forensic entomology cases, it is worth evaluating the applicability of different 272-bp and 1173-bp COI genetic markers by using species from the specific geographic areas (30). As expected, this region of mtDNA had a strong adenine-thymine bias, which is characteristic of insect mtDNA (6,12). No insertions or deletions were identified within the aligned sequences, as was found in studies conducted on other mtDNA fragments (6,11,31,32). Based on both tested COI fragments, C. megacephala and M. autumnalis samples were both sequenced from China and Egypt and showed minimal variation between populations. However, the largest intraspecific variation was observed between the species collected from different locations within one country. These results are in agreement with the study by Harvey et al (20), who tested 1167-bp COI for identification of Calliphoridae of Australian and South African origin. The low intraspecific variation between two countries indicates the value of the mtDNA region in interspecific distinction (33,34). One study suggested that intraspecific variation should be ≤1% and between-species separation ≥3% (35), whereas other studies suggested establishing group-specific thresholds (8,11). In the present study, results of both short and long COI fragments support the idea of establishing group-specific thresholds because the 3 investigated species that belong to Muscidae exhibited the lowest interspecific variation, leading to an overlap between intraspecific and interspecific nucleotide divergences. Interestingly, although low sequence divergence can result in similar haplotypes, which may lead to misidentification and a wrong PMI estimate (8), 1173-bp COI was able to distinguish between M. autumnalis and F. canicularis without bias, but 272-bp COI was not. Based on 1173-bp COI gene tree, all species were reciprocally monophyletic with full bootstrap support. This observation was the same as for the analysis based on 272-bp COI fragment, except for M. autumnalis and F. canicularis. Surprisingly, trees based on both fragments showed that Chrysomya clade did not directly join with the other clade belonging to Calliphoridae. This observation may shed light on the importance of examining the exact relationship between these groups. Based on 1173-bp COI gene tree, Aldrichina clade presented a deviation from traditional taxonomy because this species (Calliphorinae) was identified as a sister species to Chrysomya rather than to Lucilia (16). This pattern of evolution was also observed previously based on 28rRNA alone (36) and based on COI, CYTB, and ITS2 in a multi-gene approach (16). This relation was different from that observed based on 272-bp COI, when A. grahami was embedded within Lucilia tribe. The data obtained by 1173-bp COI phylogenetic analysis were more in accordance with the traditional morphological classification than the data obtained by 272-bp COI fragment analysis. In this preliminary genetic identification of fly species from Egypt and China, we found that the long COI fragment outperformed the short one in species identification. Since the sample size was small, we recommend an evaluation of more samples using the same and other loci to confirm our findings. In addition, it is important to identify additional forensically important fly species and expand such analyses to all relevant Egyptian and Chinese species.
  29 in total

1.  Genetic relationships between blowflies (Calliphoridae) of forensic importance.

Authors:  J Stevens; R Wall
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Alina Cywinska; Shelley L Ball; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Molecular identification of some forensically important blowflies of southern Africa and Australia.

Authors:  M L Harvey; M W Mansell; M H Villet; I R Dadour
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.739

4.  Keys for identification of species of family Calliphoridae (Diptera) in Egypt.

Authors:  N F Shaumar; S K Mohammed; S A Mohammed
Journal:  J Egypt Soc Parasitol       Date:  1989-12

5.  Flies of subfamily Muscinae (Muscidae-Diptera) in Egypt.

Authors:  N F Shaumar; S K Mohamed; I F Shoukry
Journal:  J Egypt Soc Parasitol       Date:  1985-12

6.  Species identification of the forensically important flies in Iwate prefecture, Japan based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase gene subunit I (COI) sequences.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Saigusa; Masataka Takamiya; Yasuhiro Aoki
Journal:  Leg Med (Tokyo)       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.376

7.  The utility of mitochondrial DNA sequences for the identification of forensically important blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in southeastern Australia.

Authors:  J F Wallman; S C Donnellan
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase I gene: potential for distinction between immature stages of some forensically important fly species (Diptera) in western Australia.

Authors:  Michelle L Harvey; Ian R Dadour; Silvana Gaudieri
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  A DNA-based approach to the identification of insect species used for postmortem interval estimation.

Authors:  F A Sperling; G S Anderson; D A Hickey
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.832

10.  Applicability of partial characterization of cytochrome oxidase I in identification of forensically important flies (Diptera) from China and Egypt.

Authors:  Sanaa Mohamed Aly; Jifang Wen
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.289

View more
  5 in total

1.  Megastigmus seed chalcids (Hymenoptera, Torymidae) radiated much more on Angiosperms than previously considered. I- Description of 8 new species from Kenya, with a key to the females of Eastern and Southern Africa.

Authors:  Alain Roques; Robert S Copeland; Laurent Soldati; Olivier Denux; Marie-Anne Auger-Rozenberg
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 1.546

2.  Improved phylogeny of brown algae Cystoseira (Fucales) from the Atlantic-Mediterranean region based on mitochondrial sequences.

Authors:  Carolina Bruno de Sousa; Cymon J Cox; Luís Brito; Maria Madalena Pavão; Hugo Pereira; Ana Ferreira; Catarina Ginja; Lenea Campino; Ricardo Bermejo; Manuela Parente; João Varela
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Longer mtDNA Fragments Provide a Better Insight into the Genetic Diversity of the Sycamore Lace Bug, Corythucha ciliata (Say, 1832) (Tingidae, Hemiptera), Both in Its Native and Invaded Areas.

Authors:  Ferenc Lakatos; Katalin Tuba; Boglárka Bender; Hisashi Kajimura; Viktória Tóth
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.769

4.  Chrysomya chani Kurahashi (Diptera: Calliphoridae), a blow fly species of forensic importance: morphological characters of the third larval instar and a case report from Thailand.

Authors:  Kabkaew L Sukontason; Tanin Bhoopat; Anchalee Wannasan; Narin Sontigun; Sangob Sanit; Jens Amendt; Chutharat Samerjai; Kom Sukontason
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2018-02-09

Review 5.  A brief review of forensically important flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae).

Authors:  Lipin Ren; Yanjie Shang; Wei Chen; Fanming Meng; Jifeng Cai; Guanghui Zhu; Lushi Chen; Yong Wang; Jianqiang Deng; Yadong Guo
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2018-03-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.