| Literature DB >> 24577823 |
Abstract
AIM: To compare the reliability of short and long cytochrome oxidase I gene fragment (COI) in identification of forensically important Diptera from Egypt and China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24577823 PMCID: PMC3944415 DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2014.55.19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Croat Med J ISSN: 0353-9504 Impact factor: 1.351
Specimens used in the study
| Species | Code in neighbor-joining tree | Location | Accession number | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CmC1 | Changsha, China | KC249623 | KC249673 | |||
| CmC2 | Changsha, China | KC249624 | KC249674 | |||
| CmE3 | Ismailia, Egypt | KC249625 | KC249675 | |||
| CmE4 | Ismailia, Egypt | KC249626 | KC249676 | |||
| Cm5 | JX187372* | |||||
| CalbE1 | Alkantra shark, Egypt | KC249627 | KC249677 | |||
| CalbE2 | Alkantra shark, Egypt | KC249628 | KC249678 | |||
| CalbE3 | Alkantra shark, Egypt | KC249629 | KC249679 | |||
| CalbE4 | Ismailia, Egypt | KC249630 | KC249680 | |||
| CalbE5 | Ismailia, Egypt | KC249631 | KC249681 | |||
| Calb6 | AF083657* | |||||
| CrC1 | Changsha, China | KC249632 | KC249682 | |||
| CrC2 | Changsha, China | KC249633 | KC249683 | |||
| Cr3 | JX187383* | |||||
| CnC1 | Changsha, China | KC249634 | KC249684 | |||
| CnC2 | Changsha, China | KC249635 | KC249685 | |||
| CnC3 | Guangzhou, China | KC249636 | KC249686 | |||
| CnC4 | Guangzhou, China | KC249637 | KC249687 | |||
| AgC1 | Changsha, China | KC249638 | KC249688 | |||
| AgC2 | Guangzhou, China | KC249639 | KC249689 | |||
| LsC1 | Changsha, China | KC249640 | KC249690 | |||
| LsC2 | Changsha, China | KC249641 | KC249691 | |||
| LbC1 | Zhangjiajie China | KC249642 | KC249692 | |||
| LbC2 | Zhangjiajie China | KC249643 | KC249693 | |||
| LcaC1 | China | KC249644 | KC249694 | |||
| LcaC2 | China | KC249645 | KC249695 | |||
| LcuC1 | Changsha China | KC249646 | KC249696 | |||
| LcuC2 | Changsha China | KC249647 | KC249697 | |||
| LpC1 | Changsha China | KC249648 | KC249698 | |||
| LpC2 | Changsha China | KC249649 | KC249699 | |||
| MdE1 | Alkantra shark, Egypt | KC249650 | KC249700 | |||
| MdE2 | Ismailia Egypt | KC249651 | KC249701 | |||
| MdE3 | Ismailia Egypt | KC249652 | KC249702 | |||
| MaC1 | Changsha, China | KC249653 | KC249703 | |||
| MaC2 | Changsha, China | KC249654 | KC249704 | |||
| MaE3 | Ismailia, Egypt | KC249655 | KC249705 | |||
| MaE4 | Alkantra shark, Egypt | KC249656 | KC249706 | |||
| MaE5 | Portsaid, Egypt | KC249657 | KC249707 | |||
| FcE1 | Ismailia, Egypt | KC249658 | KC249708 | |||
| FcE2 | Ismailia, Egypt | KC249659 | KC249709 | |||
| FcE3 | Alkantra shark, Egypt | KC249660 | KC249710 | |||
| SalbC1 | Changsha China | KC249661 | KC249711 | |||
| SalbC2 | Changsha China | KC249662 | KC249712 | |||
| SdC1 | Changsha China | KC249663 | KC249713 | |||
| SdC2 | Changsha China | KC249664 | KC249714 | |||
| SaC1 | Changsha, China | KC249665 | KC249715 | |||
| SaC2 | Xining, China | KC249666 | KC249716 | |||
| SaC3 | Changsha, China | KC249667 | KC249717 | |||
| Sa4 | JQ582120* | |||||
| SargyE1 | Alkantra shark, Egypt | KC249668 | KC249718 | |||
| SargyE2 | Ismailia Egypt | KC249669 | KC249719 | |||
| SargyE3 | Ismailia Egypt | KC249670 | KC249720 | |||
| Sargy4 | JQ582123* | |||||
| SperC1 | Changsha, China | KC249671 | KC249721 | |||
| SperC2 | Changsha, China | KC249672 | KC249722 | |||
*GenBank accession numbers are given for previously published sequences.
Figure 1The neighbor-joining tree using Kimura’s 2-parameter model illustrating phylogenetic relationships among 18 fly species based on 272-bp cytochrome oxidase I sequences. Sample codes are as in Table 1. Numbers on branches indicate the support value. Evolutionary distance divergence scale bar is 0.01.
Calculated intra- and interspecific divergences expressed as percentage of the analyzed 272-bp (below the diagonal) and 1173-bp (above the diagonal) cytochrome oxidase I gene fragment using neighbor-joining (NJ) approach with Kimura’s 2-parameter (K2P) model*
| No | Species | N | V1 | V2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
*Abbreviations: N – number of specimens; V1 – intraspecific variations within 272-bp fragment; V2 – intraspecific variations within 1173-bp fragment.
Figure 2The neighbor-joining tree using Kimura’s 2-parameter model illustrating phylogenetic relationships among 18 fly species based on 1173-bp cytochrome oxidase I sequences. Sample codes are as in Table 1. Numbers on branches indicate the support value. Evolutionary distance divergence scale bar is 0.01.