BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective but morbid procedure in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. We report our outcomes at a single tertiary institution. METHOD: A total of 170 consecutive patients underwent CRS-HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis between July 2007 and August 2012. The peritoneal cancer index (1-39) was used for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) staging. Mitomycin C (88.8%) was administered intraperitoneally at 42 °C for 90 mins. Risk factors associated with major morbidities were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analyses. RESULTS: The mean age was 55.1 (±11.3) years, and the majority (77.1%) of patients had complete cytoreduction (CC0-1). Tumor types included colorectal (n = 51, 30.0%), appendiceal (n = 50, 29.4 %), pseudomyxoma peritonei (n = 16, 9.4%), and other (n = 53, 31.2%). Factors associated with major complications were estimated blood loss (>400 ml), length of stay (>1 week), intraoperative blood transfusion, operative time (>6 h), and bowel anastomosis. Intraoperative blood transfusion was the only independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (p = 0.031). Median follow-up was 15.7 months (±1.2). The recurrence rates for colorectal and appendiceal carcinoma at 1 and 3 years were 40%, 53.5% and 68%, 79.1%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year overall survival for colorectal and appendiceal carcinomatosis was 74.0%, 32.5% and 89.4%, 29.3%, respectively. Intraoperative peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score (>16) and need for blood transfusion were factors independently associated with poor survival (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our single institution experience of CRS/HIPEC procedures for peritoneal carcinomatosis demonstrates acceptable perioperative outcome and long-term survival. Optimal cytoreduction was achieved in the majority of cases. Intraoperative PCI > 16 was associated with poor survival. This series supports the safety of CRS-HIPEC in selected patients.
BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective but morbid procedure in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. We report our outcomes at a single tertiary institution. METHOD: A total of 170 consecutive patients underwent CRS-HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis between July 2007 and August 2012. The peritoneal cancer index (1-39) was used for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) staging. Mitomycin C (88.8%) was administered intraperitoneally at 42 °C for 90 mins. Risk factors associated with major morbidities were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analyses. RESULTS: The mean age was 55.1 (±11.3) years, and the majority (77.1%) of patients had complete cytoreduction (CC0-1). Tumor types included colorectal (n = 51, 30.0%), appendiceal (n = 50, 29.4 %), pseudomyxoma peritonei (n = 16, 9.4%), and other (n = 53, 31.2%). Factors associated with major complications were estimated blood loss (>400 ml), length of stay (>1 week), intraoperative blood transfusion, operative time (>6 h), and bowel anastomosis. Intraoperative blood transfusion was the only independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (p = 0.031). Median follow-up was 15.7 months (±1.2). The recurrence rates for colorectal and appendiceal carcinoma at 1 and 3 years were 40%, 53.5% and 68%, 79.1%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year overall survival for colorectal and appendiceal carcinomatosis was 74.0%, 32.5% and 89.4%, 29.3%, respectively. Intraoperative peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score (>16) and need for blood transfusion were factors independently associated with poor survival (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our single institution experience of CRS/HIPEC procedures for peritoneal carcinomatosis demonstrates acceptable perioperative outcome and long-term survival. Optimal cytoreduction was achieved in the majority of cases. Intraoperative PCI > 16 was associated with poor survival. This series supports the safety of CRS-HIPEC in selected patients.
Authors: O Glehen; D Osinsky; E Cotte; F Kwiatkowski; G Freyer; S Isaac; V Trillet-Lenoir; A C Sayag-Beaujard; Y François; J Vignal; F N Gilly Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Paul H Sugarbaker; Robert Alderman; Gary Edwards; Christina Ellen Marquardt; Vadim Gushchin; Jesus Esquivel; David Chang Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2006-03-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Niraj J Gusani; Sung W Cho; Christos Colovos; Songwon Seo; Jan Franko; Scott D Richard; Robert P Edwards; Charles K Brown; Matthew P Holtzman; Herbert J Zeh; David L Bartlett Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-12-12 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Stephanie Downs-Canner; Ying Ding; Deepa R Magge; Heather Jones; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Amer Zureikat; Matthew Holtzman; Steven Ahrendt; James Pingpank; Herbert J Zeh; David L Bartlett; Haroon A Choudry Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Sebastian Blaj; Sebastian Nedelcut; Max Mayr; Hubert Leebmann; Daniel Leucuta; Gabriel Glockzin; Pompiliu Piso Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2019-07-27 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Boateng Kubi; Richard Nudotor; Nadege Fackche; Wasay Nizam; Jordan M Cloyd; Travis E Grotz; Keith F Fournier; Sean P Dineen; Benjamin D Powers; Jula Veerapong; Joel M Baumgartner; Callisia N Clarke; Sameer H Patel; Laura A Lambert; Daniel E Abbott; Kara A Vande Walle; Mustafa Raoof; Byrne Lee; Shishir K Maithel; Charles A Staley; Fabian M Johnston; Jonathan B Greer Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 5.344