Literature DB >> 24577694

Positive and negative interactions between environmental conditions affecting Cercocarpus ledifolius seedling survival.

Inés Ibáñez1,2, Eugene W Schupp1.   

Abstract

We evaluated the balance between positive and negative effects of environmental conditions on first-year seedling survival of the tree Cercocarpus ledifolius during two summers, 1996 and 1997. The experimental design was fully crossed with two levels of water, with and without supplementation, two levels of herbivory, with and without protection, and three major microhabitats, open interspaces, under the canopy of Artemisia tridentata shrubs, and under the canopy of mature C. ledifolius trees. Effects of drought and herbivory on seedling survival depended on the year. Water supplementation and herbivory protection during the dry summer of 1996 (27.7 mm) generally increased seedling survival. Additionally, survival tended to be greatest beneath C. ledifolius canopies. More important ecologically were the significant interactions. In 1996, water supplementation increased survival more with than without herbivory protection. The three-way interaction, treatment-microhabitat combination, was most important; by far the greatest survival was in the water supplementation and herbivory protection in the tree microhabitat. During the wet summer of 1997 (158.5 mm), neither water supplementation, herbivory protection, nor microhabitat were significant as main effects. The water-supplemented and herbivory-protected treatment again combined to yield highest survival, but this time in open interspaces rather than beneath trees. Our study shows how the importance of individual limiting factors and the relative favorableness of particular microhabitats appear to change across years depending on environmental conditions.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 24577694     DOI: 10.1007/s004420100757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  The contrasting effects of short-term climate change on the early recruitment of tree species.

Authors:  Inés Ibáñez; Daniel S W Katz; Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Effectiveness of rodents as local seed dispersers of Holm oaks.

Authors:  José M Gómez; Carolina Puerta-Piñero; Eugene W Schupp
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Plant interactions balance under biotic and abiotic stressors: the importance of herbivory in semi-arid ecosystems.

Authors:  Marina C Cock; José L Hierro
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Critical stages in the recruitment process of Rhamnus alaternus L.

Authors:  J Gulias; A Traveset; N Riera; M Mus
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Epigenetic responses of hare barley (Hordeum murinum subsp. leporinum) to climate change: an experimental, trait-based approach.

Authors:  Víctor Chano; Tania Domínguez-Flores; Maria Dolores Hidalgo-Galvez; Jesús Rodríguez-Calcerrada; Ignacio Manuel Pérez-Ramos
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Do consumer-mediated negative effects on plant establishment outweigh the positive effects of a nurse plant?

Authors:  Tomohiro Fujita; Chisato Yamashina
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Nurse plant effects on plant species richness in drylands: the role of grazing, rainfall and species specificity.

Authors:  Santiago Soliveres; David J Eldridge; Frank Hemmings; Fernando T Maestre
Journal:  Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  Microhabitat amelioration and reduced competition among understorey plants as drivers of facilitation across environmental gradients: towards a unifying framework.

Authors:  Santiago Soliveres; David J Eldridge; Fernando T Maestre; Matthew A Bowker; Matthew Tighe; Adrián Escudero
Journal:  Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 3.634

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.