BACKGROUND: Prehospital identification of acute stroke increases the possibility of early treatment and good outcome. To increase identification of stroke, the Face Arm Speech Time (FAST) test was introduced in the Emergency Medical Communication Center (EMCC). This substudy aims to evaluate the implementation of the FAST test in the EMCC and the ambulance service. METHODS: The study was conducted in the region of Stockholm, Sweden during 6 months. The study population consisted of all calls to the EMCCconcerning patients presenting at least one FAST symptom or a history/finding making the EMCC or ambulance personnel to suspect stroke within 6 h. Positive FAST was compared to diagnosis at discharge. Positive predictive values (PPV) for a stroke diagnosis at discharge were calculated. RESULTS: In all, 900 patients with a median age of 71 years were enrolled, 667 (74%) by the EMCC and 233 (26%) by the ambulances. At discharge, 472 patients (52%) were diagnosed with stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), 337 identified by the EMCC (71%) and 135 (29%) by the ambulances. The PPV for a discharge diagnosis of stroke/TIA was 51% (CI 47-54%) in EMCC-enrolled and 58% (CI 52-64%) in ambulance-enrolled patients. With a positive FAST the PPV of a correct stroke/TIA diagnosis increased to 56% (CI 52-61%) and 73% (CI 66-80%) in EMCC- and ambulance-enrolled patients, respectively. Positive FAST from EMCC was also found in 44% of patients with a nonstroke diagnosis at discharge. A stroke/TIA diagnosis at discharge but negative FAST was found in 58 and 27 patients enrolled by the EMCC and ambulances, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PPV of FAST is higher when used on the scene by ambulance than by EMCC. FAST may be a useful prehospital tool to identify stroke/TIA but has limitations as the test can be negative in true strokes, can be positive in nonstrokes, and FAST symptoms may be present but not identified in the emergency call. For the prehospital care situation better identification tools are needed.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Prehospital identification of acute stroke increases the possibility of early treatment and good outcome. To increase identification of stroke, the Face Arm Speech Time (FAST) test was introduced in the Emergency Medical Communication Center (EMCC). This substudy aims to evaluate the implementation of the FAST test in the EMCC and the ambulance service. METHODS: The study was conducted in the region of Stockholm, Sweden during 6 months. The study population consisted of all calls to the EMCC concerning patients presenting at least one FAST symptom or a history/finding making the EMCC or ambulance personnel to suspect stroke within 6 h. Positive FAST was compared to diagnosis at discharge. Positive predictive values (PPV) for a stroke diagnosis at discharge were calculated. RESULTS: In all, 900 patients with a median age of 71 years were enrolled, 667 (74%) by the EMCC and 233 (26%) by the ambulances. At discharge, 472 patients (52%) were diagnosed with stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), 337 identified by the EMCC (71%) and 135 (29%) by the ambulances. The PPV for a discharge diagnosis of stroke/TIA was 51% (CI 47-54%) in EMCC-enrolled and 58% (CI 52-64%) in ambulance-enrolled patients. With a positive FAST the PPV of a correct stroke/TIA diagnosis increased to 56% (CI 52-61%) and 73% (CI 66-80%) in EMCC- and ambulance-enrolled patients, respectively. Positive FAST from EMCC was also found in 44% of patients with a nonstroke diagnosis at discharge. A stroke/TIA diagnosis at discharge but negative FAST was found in 58 and 27 patients enrolled by the EMCC and ambulances, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PPV of FAST is higher when used on the scene by ambulance than by EMCC. FAST may be a useful prehospital tool to identify stroke/TIA but has limitations as the test can be negative in true strokes, can be positive in nonstrokes, and FAST symptoms may be present but not identified in the emergency call. For the prehospital care situation better identification tools are needed.
Authors: Brian S Katz; Opeolu Adeoye; Heidi Sucharew; Joseph P Broderick; Jason McMullan; Pooja Khatri; Michael Widener; Kathleen S Alwell; Charles J Moomaw; Brett M Kissela; Matthew L Flaherty; Daniel Woo; Simona Ferioli; Jason Mackey; Sharyl Martini; Felipe De Los Rios la Rosa; Dawn O Kleindorfer Journal: Stroke Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Anne Behrndtz; Richard Beare; Svitlana Iievlieva; Grethe Andersen; Jeppe Mainz; Martin Gude; Henry Ma; Velandai Srikanth; Claus Z Simonsen; Thanh Phan Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Annika Berglund; Mia von Euler; Karin Schenck-Gustafsson; Maaret Castrén; Katarina Bohm Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Carl Willers; Ingrid Lekander; Elisabeth Ekstrand; Mikael Lilja; Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen; Katharina S Sunnerhagen; Mia von Euler Journal: Biol Sex Differ Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 5.027
Authors: Gunnar Andsberg; Magnus Esbjörnsson; Arne Olofsson; Arne Lindgren; Bo Norrving; Mia von Euler Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Stephanie P Jones; Janet E Bray; Josephine Me Gibson; Graham McClelland; Colette Miller; Chris I Price; Caroline L Watkins Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Valeria Guglielmi; Nina-Suzanne Groeneveld; Laura Posthuma; Adrien E Groot; Charles Blm Majoie; Hanna Talacua; Abdullah Kaya; S Matthijs Boekholdt; R Nils Planken; Yvo Bwem Roos; Jonathan M Coutinho Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2019-10-22