Literature DB >> 24576836

Computed tomography assessment of hemodynamic significance of coronary artery disease: CT perfusion, contrast gradients by coronary CTA, and fractional flow reserve review.

Christian Loewe1, Alfred Stadler.   

Abstract

The need for functional estimation of the relevance of stenosis to guide appropriate treatment in coronary artery disease has recently been shown. Invasive coronary angiography (CA) with invasive measurement of the pressure gradient in patients with coronary stenoses becomes the method of choice for treatment decision-making in invasive cardiology. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) was established several years ago as a noninvasive alternative to invasive CA; it is used primarily to exclude coronary artery disease and has shown a very high negative predictive value in this regard. During the last several years, in an effort to obtain functional information, CCTA has received much attention. The rationale for this is that with the functional information provided by CT, the positive predictive value for "relevant" stenoses should be improved. In this article, the history and limitations of anatomic grading of coronary stenoses will be discussed. Furthermore, shifts in the treatment paradigm in modern cardiology will be introduced, as well as an overview of the currently used invasive methods to assess the "relevance" of stenosis. The current role and still-existing limitations of CCTA, as well as the systematic problems in comparing CA and CCTA, are addressed. As CCTA is a highly innovative technique, new innovations are currently under clinical evaluation, including myocardial perfusion imaging, attenuation gradient measurement, and assessment of fractional flow reserve with CT. This review article will mainly focus on the technical background of these techniques and the status of their clinical implementation and will attempt to provide some suppositions about the possible future role of these new innovations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24576836     DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Imaging        ISSN: 0883-5993            Impact factor:   3.000


  4 in total

Review 1.  Stress echocardiography: what is new and how does it compare with myocardial perfusion imaging and other modalities?

Authors:  Marysia S Tweet; Adelaide M Arruda-Olson; Nandan S Anavekar; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Perfusion debate.

Authors:  H William Strauss
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Physiology and coronary artery disease: emerging insights from computed tomography imaging based computational modeling.

Authors:  Parastou Eslami; Vikas Thondapu; Julia Karady; Eline M J Hartman; Zexi Jin; Mazen Albaghdadi; Michael Lu; Jolanda J Wentzel; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Additional Value of Machine-Learning Computed Tomographic Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve Compared to Standard Computed Tomographic Angiography.

Authors:  Dirk Lossnitzer; Leonard Chandra; Marlon Rutsch; Tobias Becher; Daniel Overhoff; Sonja Janssen; Christel Weiss; Martin Borggrefe; Ibrahim Akin; Stefan Pfleger; Stefan Baumann
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.