Literature DB >> 24576105

Why group & save? Blood transfusion at low-risk elective caesarean section.

Owen Stock1, Michael Beckmann.   

Abstract

Women undergoing elective caesarean section (CS) routinely have a group and save ordered as part of their preoperative assessment, whereas women with expected vaginal birth do not. Our aim was therefore to determine the rate of blood transfusion at elective CS compared with vaginal birth in a large Australian maternity hospital. A retrospective cohort study was performed using routinely collected de-identified data of 35 477 women, over 4 years, who delivered at the Mater Mothers' Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. After excluding women with established risk factors for transfusion, the likelihood of blood transfusion following elective CS was significantly lower compared to vaginal birth (aOR 0.47 (0.29, 0.77)).
© 2014 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth; blood grouping and cross-matching; blood transfusion; caesarean section; health resources

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24576105     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  2 in total

1.  Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.

Authors:  Lina Herstad; Kari Klungsøyr; Rolv Skjærven; Tom Tanbo; Lisa Forsén; Thomas Åbyholm; Siri Vangen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Enhancing the utilization of packed red blood cells stock in maternity hospitals.

Authors:  Waleed M Bawazir; Fahad M Dakkam
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.484

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.