Matthew Lohman1, Levent Dumenci, Briana Mezuk. 1. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the degree of diagnostic overlap between frailty and depression and to investigate whether sex differences in symptom endorsement influence this overlap. DESIGN: Cross-sectional latent class analysis. SETTING: Data were from the 2008 wave of the Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative longitudinal survey of health characteristics of older adults. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older completing a general health questionnaire and consenting to physical measurements (N = 3,665). MEASUREMENTS: Frailty was measured using criteria developed in the Cardiovascular Health Study, and depressive symptoms were measured using the eight-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale. RESULTS: Frailty and depression were best modeled as two distinct but highly correlated constructs with three and four classes of symptom response, respectively. Measurement overlap was high in men and women. Approximately 73% of individuals with severe depressive symptoms and 86% with primarily somatic depressive symptoms were categorized as concurrently frail. The degree of construct overlap between depression and frailty did not significantly vary according to sex, but women were significantly more likely to endorse all frailty and depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: Measures of depression and frailty identify substantially overlapping populations of older men and women. More-frequent endorsement of depressive symptoms, but not differential endorsement of somatic symptoms, may contribute to the higher prevalence of frailty in women. The symptom of exhaustion is particularly important to the correlation between these two conditions. Findings will inform clinician and researcher efforts to refine the definition of geriatric syndromes such as frailty and to develop effective interventions.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the degree of diagnostic overlap between frailty and depression and to investigate whether sex differences in symptom endorsement influence this overlap. DESIGN: Cross-sectional latent class analysis. SETTING: Data were from the 2008 wave of the Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative longitudinal survey of health characteristics of older adults. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older completing a general health questionnaire and consenting to physical measurements (N = 3,665). MEASUREMENTS: Frailty was measured using criteria developed in the Cardiovascular Health Study, and depressive symptoms were measured using the eight-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale. RESULTS:Frailty and depression were best modeled as two distinct but highly correlated constructs with three and four classes of symptom response, respectively. Measurement overlap was high in men and women. Approximately 73% of individuals with severe depressive symptoms and 86% with primarily somatic depressive symptoms were categorized as concurrently frail. The degree of construct overlap between depression and frailty did not significantly vary according to sex, but women were significantly more likely to endorse all frailty and depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: Measures of depression and frailty identify substantially overlapping populations of older men and women. More-frequent endorsement of depressive symptoms, but not differential endorsement of somatic symptoms, may contribute to the higher prevalence of frailty in women. The symptom of exhaustion is particularly important to the correlation between these two conditions. Findings will inform clinician and researcher efforts to refine the definition of geriatric syndromes such as frailty and to develop effective interventions.
Authors: Shelley A Sternberg; Andrea Wershof Schwartz; Sathya Karunananthan; Howard Bergman; A Mark Clarfield Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: B Silverstein; T Edwards; A Gamma; V Ajdacic-Gross; W Rossler; J Angst Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Ihab Hajjar; Frances Yang; Farzaneh Sorond; Richard N Jones; William Milberg; L Adrienne Cupples; Lewis A Lipsitz Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Susan L Lakey; Andrea Z LaCroix; Shelly L Gray; Soo Borson; Carla D Williams; Darren Calhoun; Joseph S Goveas; Jordan W Smoller; Judith K Ockene; Kamal H Masaki; Mace Coday; Milagros C Rosal; Nancy F Woods Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-05-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Matthew C Lohman; Karen L Whiteman; Rebecca L Greenberg; Martha L Bruce Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Martha L Bruce; Matthew C Lohman; Rebecca L Greenberg; Yuhua Bao; Patrick J Raue Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-10-14 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Rose M Collard; Hannie C Comijs; Paul Naarding; Brenda W Penninx; Yuri Milaneschi; Luigi Ferrucci; Richard C Oude Voshaar Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: M K Borges; C V Romanini; N A Lima; M Petrella; D L da Costa; V N An; B N Aguirre; J R Galdeano; I C Fernandes; J F Cecato; E C Robello; R C Oude Voshaar; I Aprahamian Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.075