Literature DB >> 24576053

Perceived correlates of domain-specific physical activity in rural adults in the Midwest.

Matthew Chrisman1, Faryle Nothwehr, Jingzen Yang, Jacob Oleson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In response to calls for more specificity when measuring physical activity, this study examined perceived correlates of this behavior in rural adults separately by the domain in which this behavior occurs (ie, home care, work, active living, and sport).
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was completed by 407 adults from 2 rural towns in the Midwest. The questionnaire assessed the perceived social and physical environment, including neighborhood characteristics, as well as barriers to being active. The Kaiser Physical Activity Survey captured domain-specific activity levels. The response rate was 25%. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the associations between social and physical environment factors and domain-specific physical activity.
FINDINGS: Having a favorable attitude toward using government funds for exercise and activity-friendly neighborhood characteristic were positively associated with active living. Friends encouraging exercise was positively associated with participation in sport. Barriers were inversely associated with active living and sport. Total physical activity was positively associated with workplace incentives for exercise, favorable policy attitudes toward supporting physical education in schools and supporting the use of government funds for biking trails, and it was inversely associated with barriers. There were no factors associated with physical activity in the domains of work or home care.
CONCLUSIONS: Correlates of physical activity are unique to the domain in which this behavior occurs. Programs to increase physical activity in rural adults should target policy attitudes, neighborhood characteristics, and social support from friends while also working to decrease personal barriers to exercise.
© 2014 National Rural Health Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active living; environment; physical activity; rural; social determinants of health

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24576053      PMCID: PMC4249690          DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  27 in total

1.  The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity.

Authors:  Billie Giles-Corti; Robert J Donovan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Differential correlates of physical activity in urban and rural adults of various socioeconomic backgrounds in the United States.

Authors:  S E Parks; R A Housemann; R C Brownson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Obesity and physical inactivity in rural America.

Authors:  Paul Daniel Patterson; Charity G Moore; Janice C Probst; Judith Ann Shinogle
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Measuring the environment for friendliness toward physical activity: a comparison of the reliability of 3 questionnaires.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Jen Jen Chang; Amy A Eyler; Barbara E Ainsworth; Karen A Kirtland; Brian E Saelens; James F Sallis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Psychosocial and perceived environmental correlates of physical activity in rural and older african american and white women.

Authors:  Sara Wilcox; Melissa Bopp; Larissa Oberrecht; Sandra K Kammermann; Charles T McElmurray
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Distance between homes and exercise facilities related to frequency of exercise among San Diego residents.

Authors:  J F Sallis; M F Hovell; C R Hofstetter; J P Elder; M Hackley; C J Caspersen; K E Powell
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors.

Authors:  J F Sallis; R M Grossman; R B Pinski; T L Patterson; P R Nader
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States.

Authors:  R C Brownson; E A Baker; R A Housemann; L K Brennan; S J Bacak
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Evaluation of the kaiser physical activity survey in women.

Authors:  B E Ainsworth; B Sternfeld; M T Richardson; K Jackson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Personal, social, and environmental correlates of physical activity in rural Midwestern white women.

Authors:  Amy A Eyler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  6 in total

1.  Perceived Resources and Environmental Correlates of Domain-Specific Physical Activity in Rural Midwestern Adults.

Authors:  Matthew Chrisman; Faryle Nothwehr; Kathleen Janz; Jingzhen Yang; Jacob Oleson
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2014-08-22

2.  Rural Active Living: A Call to Action.

Authors:  M Renée Umstattd Meyer; Justin B Moore; Christiaan Abildso; Michael B Edwards; Abigail Gamble; Monica L Baskin
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct

3.  Domain-specific physical activity and the risk of colorectal cancer: results from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shahid Mahmood; Dallas R English; Robert J MacInnis; Amalia Karahalios; Neville Owen; Roger L Milne; Graham G Giles; Brigid M Lynch
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Gender differences in related influential factors of regular exercise behavior among people in Taiwan in 2007: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hsin-Yu Mao; Hui-Chuan Hsu; Shin-Da Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Environmental Influences on Physical Activity among Rural Adults in Montana, United States: Views from Built Environment Audits, Resident Focus Groups, and Key Informant Interviews.

Authors:  Brian K Lo; Emily H Morgan; Sara C Folta; Meredith L Graham; Lynn C Paul; Miriam E Nelson; Nicolette V Jew; Laurel F Moffat; Rebecca A Seguin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Identification of Effective Programs to Improve Access to and Use of Trails among Youth from Under-Resourced Communities: A Review.

Authors:  Julian A Reed; Rachel M Ballard; Michael Hill; David Berrigan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.