PURPOSE: In response to calls for more specificity when measuring physical activity, this study examined perceived correlates of this behavior in rural adults separately by the domain in which this behavior occurs (ie, home care, work, active living, and sport). METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was completed by 407 adults from 2 rural towns in the Midwest. The questionnaire assessed the perceived social and physical environment, including neighborhood characteristics, as well as barriers to being active. The Kaiser Physical Activity Survey captured domain-specific activity levels. The response rate was 25%. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the associations between social and physical environment factors and domain-specific physical activity. FINDINGS: Having a favorable attitude toward using government funds for exercise and activity-friendly neighborhood characteristic were positively associated with active living. Friends encouraging exercise was positively associated with participation in sport. Barriers were inversely associated with active living and sport. Total physical activity was positively associated with workplace incentives for exercise, favorable policy attitudes toward supporting physical education in schools and supporting the use of government funds for biking trails, and it was inversely associated with barriers. There were no factors associated with physical activity in the domains of work or home care. CONCLUSIONS: Correlates of physical activity are unique to the domain in which this behavior occurs. Programs to increase physical activity in rural adults should target policy attitudes, neighborhood characteristics, and social support from friends while also working to decrease personal barriers to exercise.
PURPOSE: In response to calls for more specificity when measuring physical activity, this study examined perceived correlates of this behavior in rural adults separately by the domain in which this behavior occurs (ie, home care, work, active living, and sport). METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was completed by 407 adults from 2 rural towns in the Midwest. The questionnaire assessed the perceived social and physical environment, including neighborhood characteristics, as well as barriers to being active. The Kaiser Physical Activity Survey captured domain-specific activity levels. The response rate was 25%. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the associations between social and physical environment factors and domain-specific physical activity. FINDINGS: Having a favorable attitude toward using government funds for exercise and activity-friendly neighborhood characteristic were positively associated with active living. Friends encouraging exercise was positively associated with participation in sport. Barriers were inversely associated with active living and sport. Total physical activity was positively associated with workplace incentives for exercise, favorable policy attitudes toward supporting physical education in schools and supporting the use of government funds for biking trails, and it was inversely associated with barriers. There were no factors associated with physical activity in the domains of work or home care. CONCLUSIONS: Correlates of physical activity are unique to the domain in which this behavior occurs. Programs to increase physical activity in rural adults should target policy attitudes, neighborhood characteristics, and social support from friends while also working to decrease personal barriers to exercise.
Authors: Ross C Brownson; Jen Jen Chang; Amy A Eyler; Barbara E Ainsworth; Karen A Kirtland; Brian E Saelens; James F Sallis Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: J F Sallis; M F Hovell; C R Hofstetter; J P Elder; M Hackley; C J Caspersen; K E Powell Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 1990 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: M Renée Umstattd Meyer; Justin B Moore; Christiaan Abildso; Michael B Edwards; Abigail Gamble; Monica L Baskin Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2016 Sep-Oct
Authors: Shahid Mahmood; Dallas R English; Robert J MacInnis; Amalia Karahalios; Neville Owen; Roger L Milne; Graham G Giles; Brigid M Lynch Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-11-03 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Brian K Lo; Emily H Morgan; Sara C Folta; Meredith L Graham; Lynn C Paul; Miriam E Nelson; Nicolette V Jew; Laurel F Moffat; Rebecca A Seguin Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 3.390