Literature DB >> 24575296

Is there a specific fracture 'cascade'?

L Joseph Melton1, Shreyasee Amin2.   

Abstract

Different kinds of epidemiologic data provide varying views of the relationships among the main osteoporotic fractures. Descriptive incidence data indicate that distal forearm fractures typically occur earlier than vertebral fractures that, in turn, precede hip fractures late in life. In addition, relative risk estimates document the fact that one osteoporotic fracture increases the risk of subsequent ones. These two observations support the notion of a 'fracture cascade' and justify the recent emphasis on secondary prevention, that is, more aggressive treatment of patients presenting with a fracture in order to prevent recurrences. However, the absolute risk of a subsequent fracture given an initial one is modest, and the degree to which the second fracture can be attributed to the first one is unclear. Moreover, the osteoporotic fractures encountered in the majority of patients are the first one experienced, and even these initial fractures lead to substantial morbidity and cost. These latter points reemphasize the importance of primary prevention, that is, the management of bone loss and other risk factors to prevent the first fracture. Continued efforts are needed to refine risk assessment algorithms so that candidates for such fracture prophylaxis can be identified more accurately and efficiently.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24575296      PMCID: PMC3935254          DOI: 10.1038/bonekey.2013.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bonekey Rep        ISSN: 2047-6396


  31 in total

Review 1.  The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: a review of aetiopathogenesis.

Authors:  A M Briggs; A M Greig; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Competing mortality and fracture risk assessment.

Authors:  W D Leslie; L M Lix; X Wu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis.

Authors:  Stacey A Wainwright; Lynn M Marshall; Kristine E Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; Dennis M Black; Teresa A Hillier; Marc C Hochberg; Molly T Vogt; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Use of clinical risk factors to identify postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures.

Authors:  J H Tobias; A P Hutchinson; L P Hunt; E V McCloskey; M D Stone; J C Martin; P W Thompson; T G Palferman; A K Bhalla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Long-term trends in the incidence of distal forearm fractures.

Authors:  L J Melton; P C Amadio; C S Crowson; W M O'Fallon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The framing effect of relative and absolute risk.

Authors:  D J Malenka; J A Baron; S Johansen; J W Wahrenberger; J M Ross
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Katie L Stone; Dana G Seeley; Li-Yung Lui; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Warren S Browner; Michael C Nevitt; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Repeat low-trauma fractures occur frequently among men and women who have osteopenic BMD.

Authors:  Lisa Langsetmo; David Goltzman; Christopher S Kovacs; Jonathan D Adachi; David A Hanley; Nancy Kreiger; Robert Josse; Alexandra Papaioannou; Wojciech P Olszynski; Sophie A Jamal
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of treatments to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis.

Authors:  Catherine MacLean; Sydne Newberry; Margaret Maglione; Maureen McMahon; Veena Ranganath; Marika Suttorp; Walter Mojica; Martha Timmer; Alicia Alexander; Melissa McNamara; Sheetal B Desai; Annie Zhou; Susan Chen; Jason Carter; Carlo Tringale; Di Valentine; Breanne Johnsen; Jennifer Grossman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Estimating the excess costs for patients with incident fractures, prevalent fractures, and nonfracture osteoporosis.

Authors:  R B Hopkins; J E Tarride; W D Leslie; C Metge; L M Lix; S Morin; G Finlayson; M Azimaee; E Pullenayegum; R Goeree; J D Adachi; A Papaioannou; L Thabane
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  6 in total

1.  A Guide to Improving the Care of Patients with Fragility Fractures, Edition 2.

Authors:  Simon C Mears; Stephen L Kates
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2015-06

2.  The risk of osteoporotic fractures and its associating risk factors according to the FRAX model in the Iranian patients: a follow-up cohort.

Authors:  Shahnaz Ghafoori; Abbasali Keshtkar; Patricia Khashayar; Mehdi Ebrahimi; Majid Ramezani; Zahra Mohammadi; Farzane Saeidifard; Nasrin Nemati; Maryam Khoshbin; Solmaz Azizian; Fatemeh Zare; Sara Shirazi; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2014-10-22

Review 3.  Fracture liaison services: improving outcomes for patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Samuel Walters; Tanvir Khan; Terence Ong; Opinder Sahota
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  The effectiveness of Police General Hospital's fracture liaison service (PGH's FLS) implementation after 5 years: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tanawat Amphansap; Nitirat Stitkitti; Alisara Arirachakaran
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2020-11-25

5.  Osteoporotic fractures and subsequent fractures: imminent fracture risk from an analysis of German real-world claims data.

Authors:  Peyman Hadji; Bernd Schweikert; Edda Kloppmann; Patrick Gille; Lars Joeres; Emese Toth; Luis Möckel; Claus-C Glüer
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  History of Previous Fracture and Imminent Fracture Risk in Swedish Women Aged 55 to 90 Years Presenting With a Fragility Fracture.

Authors:  Emese Toth; Jonas Banefelt; Kristina Åkesson; Anna Spångeus; Gustaf Ortsäter; Cesar Libanati
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 6.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.