| Literature DB >> 24574948 |
Fumitake Hata1, Hidefumi Nishimori1, Shinichiro Ikeda1, Tomomi Yajima1, Akihiko Nishio2, Yuji Ishiyama2.
Abstract
Rectal prolapses are not life-threatening, however the bleeding and fecal incontinence associated with them significantly erode quality of life and can cause concern among patients' caregivers in nursing homes. Many procedures have been reported that repair rectal prolapses, and the procedure used depends on the severity of the prolapse; however, the treatments are yet to be established. Here we report a simple and safe procedure to repair rectal prolapse perineally using stapling devices. We performed this procedure on 5 patients within a short time. All patients were followed up for over 24 months and none had any recurrences of their rectal prolapses. No complications occurred during the operations and postoperative periods. Most patients who have prolapses are elderly and fragile, so the treatment must be easy, safe, and rapid. While rectal prolapse is not life-threatening, the goal of treatment is to alleviate its symptoms. The procedure we describe is consistent with this concept. We suggest that this procedure, which uses surgical stapling devices, might be a better option for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse. We will continue to surgically correct complete rectal prolapses and investigate the long-term outcomes of the procedure.Entities:
Keywords: Perineal resection; Rectal prolapse; Stapling device
Year: 2014 PMID: 24574948 PMCID: PMC3934783 DOI: 10.1159/000354970
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Gastroenterol ISSN: 1662-0631
Patient demographics and outcomes of the procedure to repair rectal prolapses in 5 female patients
| Patient No. | Age, years | Disease duration, months | Other pelvic organ prolapse | Time to complete procedure, min | Length of resected colon/rectum, cm | Complications | Recurrence | Follow-up, months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70 | 1 | – | 42 | 11.0 | – | – | 41 |
| 2 | 56 | 2 | – | 44 | 13.0 | – | – | 38 |
| 3 | 86 | 2 | – | 26 | 10.0 | – | – | 32 |
| 4 | 86 | 6 | – | 22 | 12.0 | – | – | 32 |
| 5 | 80 | 2 | – | 25 | 08.0 | – | – | 31 |
Fig. 1a This patient's rectal wall protruded approximately 10 cm from the anal verge with marked redness, swelling and erosion, which could not be alleviated manually. A GIA was introduced through the opening of the prolapsed rectum at the 12 o'clock position and fired. The prolapsed rectum was transected on the opposite side using the same stapler. b The prolapsed rectum was then completely divided like a ‘French window’. c Finally, the divided tissue was stapled transversely at the bottom and fired upon. Then the prolapsed rectum was completely resected. d The lines of staples were completely oversewn with 8 PDS® sutures (at the 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10 and 11 o'clock positions) to reinforce them and ensure hemostasis. The anastomosis fell back into position spontaneously.