Literature DB >> 24573703

Is it time for the Cochrane Collaboration to reconsider its meta-analysis methodology?

Adedayo A Onitilo1.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Cochrane Collaboration; Meta-analysis; Methodology

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24573703      PMCID： PMC4453299          DOI： 10.3121/cmr.2013.1188-1209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med Res        ISSN： 1539-4182


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions.

Authors:  S Greenland; K O'Rourke
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  A quality-effects model for meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suhail A R Doi; Lukman Thalib
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 3.  Evidence synthesis for medical decision making and the appropriate use of quality scores.

Authors:  Suhail A R Doi
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-01-10

4.  Empirical vs natural weighting in random effects meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan J Shuster
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  The design of simulation studies in medical statistics.

Authors:  Andrea Burton; Douglas G Altman; Patrick Royston; Roger L Holder
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies.

Authors:  Simon Thompson; Ulf Ekelund; Susan Jebb; Anna Karin Lindroos; Adrian Mander; Stephen Sharp; Rebecca Turner; Désirée Wilks
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 7.196
  6 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Tai chi for health benefits in patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Liye Zou; Huiru Wang; ZhongJun Xiao; Qun Fang; Mark Zhang; Ting Li; Geng Du; Yang Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.