OBJECTIVE: To analyze the incidence of surgical site infection when the preoperative skin preparation was performed with 10% povidone-iodine and 0.5% chlorhexidine-alcohol. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, longitudinal study based on variables obtained from patients undergoing clean and potentially contaminated operations. Those involved were divided into two groups. In group 1 (G1) we included 102 patients with skin prepared withpovidone-iodine, and in group 2 (G2), 103, whose skin was prepared with chlorhexidine. In the third, seventh and 30th postoperative days we evaluated the surgical site, searching for signs of infection. RESULTS: Data related to clinical profile, such as diabetes mellitus, smoking, alcoholism, haematological data (Hb, VG and leukocytes), age and gender, and the related variables, such as number of days of preoperative hospitalization, shaving, topography of incision, antibiotic prophylaxis and resident participation in the operation were not predisposing factors for surgical site infection. Two patients in G1 and eight in G2 undergoing clean operations had some type of infection (p = 0.1789), five in G1 and three in G2 undergoing potentially contaminated operations had some type of infection (p = 0.7205). CONCLUSION: The incidence of surgical site infection in operations classified as clean and as potentially contaminated for which skin preparation was done with 10% povidone-iodine and 0.5% chlorhexidine-alcohol was similar.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the incidence of surgical site infection when the preoperative skin preparation was performed with 10% povidone-iodine and 0.5% chlorhexidine-alcohol. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, longitudinal study based on variables obtained from patients undergoing clean and potentially contaminated operations. Those involved were divided into two groups. In group 1 (G1) we included 102 patients with skin prepared with povidone-iodine, and in group 2 (G2), 103, whose skin was prepared with chlorhexidine. In the third, seventh and 30th postoperative days we evaluated the surgical site, searching for signs of infection. RESULTS: Data related to clinical profile, such as diabetes mellitus, smoking, alcoholism, haematological data (Hb, VG and leukocytes), age and gender, and the related variables, such as number of days of preoperative hospitalization, shaving, topography of incision, antibiotic prophylaxis and resident participation in the operation were not predisposing factors for surgical site infection. Two patients in G1 and eight in G2 undergoing clean operations had some type of infection (p = 0.1789), five in G1 and three in G2 undergoing potentially contaminated operations had some type of infection (p = 0.7205). CONCLUSION: The incidence of surgical site infection in operations classified as clean and as potentially contaminated for which skin preparation was done with 10% povidone-iodine and 0.5% chlorhexidine-alcohol was similar.
Authors: Brenda L Kick; Sanjeev Gumber; Heqiong Wang; Reneé H Moore; Douglas K Taylor Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Jolyn S Taylor; Claire A Marten; Kimberly A Potts; Lynn M Cloutier; Katherine E Cain; Shauna L Fenton; Tara N Tatum; Deepthi A James; Keith N Myers; Cheryl A Hubbs; Jennifer K Burzawa; Shital Vachhani; Alpa M Nick; Larissa A Meyer; Linda S Graviss; Kathy M Ware; Anne K Park; Thomas A Aloia; Diane C Bodurka; Charles F Levenback; Kathleen M Schmeler Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Jolyn S Taylor; Claire A Marten; Mark F Munsell; Charlotte C Sun; Kimberly A Potts; Jennifer K Burzawa; Alpa M Nick; Larissa A Meyer; Keith Myers; Diane C Bodurka; Thomas A Aloia; Charles F Levenback; David R Lairson; Kathleen M Schmeler Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 5.344