| Literature DB >> 24573316 |
Donghai Wen1, Ryan J Cornelius1, Dianelys Rivero-Hernandez1, Yang Yuan1, Huaqing Li1, Alan M Weinstein2, Steven C Sansom1.
Abstract
The large-conductance, calcium-activated BK-α/β4 potassium channel, localized to the intercalated cells of the distal nephron, mediates potassium secretion during high-potassium, alkaline diets. Here we determine whether BK-α/β4-mediated potassium transport is dependent on epithelial sodium channel (ENaC)-mediated sodium reabsorption. We maximized sodium-potassium exchange in the distal nephron by feeding mice a low-sodium, high-potassium diet. Wild-type and BK-β4 knockout mice were maintained on a low-sodium, high-potassium, alkaline diet or a low-sodium, high-potassium, acidic diet for 7-10 days. Wild-type mice maintained potassium homeostasis on the alkaline, but not acid, diet. BK-β4 knockout mice could not maintain potassium homeostasis on either diet. During the last 12 h of diet, wild-type mice on either a regular, alkaline, or an acid diet, or knockout mice on an alkaline diet, were administered amiloride (an ENaC inhibitor). Amiloride enhanced sodium excretion in all wild-type and knockout groups to similar values; however, amiloride diminished potassium excretion by 59% in wild-type but only by 33% in knockout mice on an alkaline diet. Similarly, amiloride decreased the trans-tubular potassium gradient by 68% in wild-type but only by 42% in knockout mice on an alkaline diet. Amiloride treatment equally enhanced sodium excretion and diminished potassium secretion in knockout mice on an alkaline diet and wild-type mice on an acid diet. Thus, the enhanced effect of amiloride on potassium secretion in wild-type compared to knockout mice on the alkaline diet clarify a BK- α/β4-mediated potassium secretory pathway in intercalated cells driven by ENaC-mediated sodium reabsorption linked to bicarbonate secretion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24573316 PMCID: PMC4077913 DOI: 10.1038/ki.2014.14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kidney Int ISSN: 0085-2538 Impact factor: 10.612
Comparison of various measurements (KW = kidney weight; V = urine volume; U[K] = urine [K]; U[Na] = urine [Na]; Uosm = urine osmolality; POsm = plasma osmolalilty; Hct. = hematocrit; UpH = urine pH) between wild type (WT) and BK-β4 knockouts (KO) on diets containing regular chow (control), low Na, high K, alkaline (Alk) and low Na, high K, acidic (Acid).
| KW | N | V | N | food | N | water | N | U[K] | N | U[Na] | N | P[K] | N | P[Na] | N | Uosm | N | Posm | N | Hct. | N | UpH | N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 | 14 | 8 | 13 | 14 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||||||||||||
| ±SEM | 14 | 0.09 | 0.29 | 0.5 | 23.4 | 17.6 | 0.017 | 1.4 | 201 | 3 | 0.6 | 0.13 | ||||||||||||
| 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 9 | 13 | 8 | 9 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| ±SEM | 8 | 0.38 | 0.19 | 0.7 | 37.2 | 0.6 | 0.16 | 2.5 | 128 | 5 | 0.9 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
| 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| ±SEM | 10 | 0.59 | 0.12 | 0.6 | 17 | 0.3 | 0.48 | 1.9 | 68 | 2 | 1.7 | 0.14 | ||||||||||||
| 16 | 16 | 12 | 15 | 16 | 14 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 6 | 16 | 13 | |||||||||||||
| ±SEM | 11 | 0.15 | 0.27 | 0.6 | 30.5 | 11.8 | 0.09 | 1.3 | 252 | 3 | 0.7 | 0.13 | ||||||||||||
| 12 | 9 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 9 | 10 | 5 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| ±SEM | 11 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.8 | 22.6 | 1 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 61 | 6 | 0.7 | 0.08 | ||||||||||||
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||
| ±SEM | 6 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.3 | 47.2 | 1 | 0.33 | 0.7 | 98 | 3 | 0.5 | 0.02 | ||||||||||||
Figure 1Bar plots illustrating (A) K clearance and (B) trans-tubular K gradient (TTKG) for WT and KO on Alk and Acid diets. Clearance and TTKG were calculated from values of table 1. *P < 0.01 vs WT; #P < 0.05 vs Alk.
Comparison of various measurements (symbols are same as in table 1) between WT and β4KO on control, Alk, or Acid diets and treated with vehicle (veh), hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), or amiloride (amil).
| KW | V | U[K] | U[Na] | P[K] | P[Na] | Uosm | Posm | Hct. | UpH | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| units | mgm | N | ml/day | N | mM | N | mM | N | mM | N | mM | N | mOsm/L | N | mOsm/L | N | % | N | N | |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
| ±SEM | 10 | 0.24 | 82.3 | 5 | 0.15 | 0.8 | 410 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.09 | ||||||||||
| 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 7 | |||||||||||
| ±SEM | 11 | 0.27 | 66.9 | 35.5 | 0.11 | 1.7 | 440 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 0.19 | ||||||||||
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
| ±SEM | 8 | 0.35 | 39 | 20.9 | 0.22 | 1.6 | 385 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 0.11 | ||||||||||
| 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |||||||||||
| ±SEM | 8 | 0.34 | 93.4 | 1.01 | 0.23 | 1.6 | 376 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 0.32 | ||||||||||
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
| ±SEM | 10 | 0.35 | 75.5 | 0.76 | 0.21 | 2.1 | 145 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 0.51 | ||||||||||
| 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | |||||||||||
| ±SEM | 1 | 0.18 | 37 | 17.5 | 0.05 | 0.8 | 201 | 2.7 | 1 | 0.25 | ||||||||||
| 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | |||||||||||
| ±SEM | 14 | 0.24 | 94 | 0.95 | 0.28 | 2 | 280 | 3.7 | 0.8 | 0.25 | ||||||||||
| 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||||
| ±SEM | 8 | 0.11 | 35 | 0.64 | 0.37 | 1.1 | 118 | 4 | 1.9 | 0.08 | ||||||||||
| 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | |||||||||||
| ±SEM | 3 | 0.02 | 63.6 | 24.9 | 0.63 | 1 | 409 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 0.14 |
Figure 2Summary bar plots illustrating the effects of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and amiloride vs vehicle on (A) K excretion and (B) Na excretion for WT on a control diet (WT-control), WT-Alk, and KO-Alk. *P < 0.05 vs vehicle. #P < 0.05 vs. WT-Alk.
Figure 3Summary bar plots illustrating the effects of HTZ and amiloride vs vehicle on (A) TTKG and (B) trans-tubular Na gradient (TTNaG) for WT-control, WT-Alk, and KO-Alk. *P < 0.05 vs vehicle. #P < 0.05 vs. WT-Alk.
Figure 4Summary bar plots illustrating effects of HCTZ and amiloride on (A) rates of K and Na excretion and (B) TTKG (left y-axis) and TTNaG (right y-axis) for WT-Acid. *P < 0.05 vs vehicle.
Figure 5Illustration of interaction between defined transporters of the cortical collecting duct that can explain how the Na-K-ATPAse of the principal cells (PC) can drive BK-α/β4-mediated K secretion in the intercalated cells (IC). Secretion of HCO3 in exchange for Cl via pendrin raises the luminal [HCO3] as the luminal Cl is forced through the IC instead of through the paracellular pathway, where it would short-circuit the Vte. The greater resistance of the tight junction pathway augments the electronegative lumen potential and driving force for K secretion. The large plasma to lumen chemical gradient for Na and the generation of intracellular HCO3 create a driving force for BK-mediated K secretion and NaHCO3 secretion with Na recycling to generate a higher ratio of amiloride sensitive K secretion per Na reabsorption.
Comparison of various measurements (symbols are same as in table 1) of WT mice on Acid diet and treated with veh, HCTZ, or amil.
| KW | V | U[K] | U[Na] | P[K] | P[Na] | Uosm | Posm | Hct. | UpH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| units | mgm | ml/day | mM | mM | mM | mM | mOsm/L | mOsm/L | % | |
| ±SEM (n=5) | 5 | 0.19 | 9.5 | 0.6 | 0.74 | 2.3 | 29 | 6.8 | 2.8 | 0.05 |
| ±SEM (n=3) | 10 | 0.33 | 26 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 103 | 12 | 1.5 | 0.1 |
| ±SEM (n=3) | 26 | 0.24 | 36.3 | 18.2 | 0.68 | 0.8 | 320 | 11.3 | 3.7 | 0.1 |