Literature DB >> 24572855

Single-stage autologous ear reconstruction for microtia.

Leila Kasrai1, Alison K Snyder-Warwick, David M Fisher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors have been using the Nagata technique since 2002. In this review of 100 consecutive ear reconstructions, the authors present technique modifications that have evolved over this period that have contributed to improved auricular contour and that now allow for auricular reconstruction in a single stage.
METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of a prospectively acquired database. The series is restricted to primary reconstructions performed for congenital microtia. Photographs of 10 consecutive patients are presented to demonstrate the results of the technique. Surgical complication rates are discussed.
RESULTS: One hundred ear reconstructions were performed in 96 patients. There were 75 primary cases of congenital microtia. Twenty-four ears underwent a two-stage reconstruction, and 51 ears were reconstructed with a Nagata stage I procedure or a single-stage reconstruction. There was a gradual shift in technique, with a trend to perform fewer Nagata stage II outsetting procedures and more single-stage reconstructions. In patients who underwent an ear reconstruction in two stages, the surgical complication rate was 22 percent. In the last 40 consecutive ear reconstructions since abandoning the two-stage approach, the surgical complication rate is now 15 percent.
CONCLUSIONS: A modification of Nagata's technique of autologous ear reconstruction for microtia is described. Modifications of the three-dimensional framework address the contour of the inferior crus and control tragal projection and position. Inclusion of a projection block and recruitment of retroauricular skin allow for symmetric projection of the ear in a single stage. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24572855     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  Modular Component Assembly Approach to Microtia Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jessica R Gandy; Bryan Lemieux; Allen Foulad; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.611

2.  Isolation, identification, and comparison of cartilage stem progenitor/cells from auricular cartilage and perichondrium.

Authors:  Ke Xue; Xiaodie Zhang; Lin Qi; Jia Zhou; Kai Liu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the ear for patient-specific reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Luc Nimeskern; Eva-Maria Feldmann; Willy Kuo; Silke Schwarz; Eva Goldberg-Bockhorn; Susanne Dürr; Ralph Müller; Nicole Rotter; Kathryn S Stok
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Augmented Reality Technology for the Positioning of the Auricle in the Treatment of Microtia.

Authors:  Takashi Nuri; Daisuke Mitsuno; Yuki Otsuki; Koichi Ueda
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-02-06

5.  Evaluation of the Usability of a Low-Cost 3D Printer in a Tissue Engineering Approach for External Ear Reconstruction.

Authors:  Constanze Kuhlmann; Jana C Blum; Thilo L Schenck; Riccardo E Giunta; Paul Severin Wiggenhauser
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  [Research progress of clinical therapy for concha-type microtia].

Authors:  Fengfeng Guo; Lin Lin; Haiyue Jiang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-05-15

7.  Reconstruction of Congenital Microtia and Anotia: Analysis of Practitioner Epidemiology and Postoperative Outcomes.

Authors:  Nicholas G Cuccolo; Myrthe J Zwierstra; Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Abbas Peymani; Salim Afshar; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-06-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.