Literature DB >> 24572843

Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends.

Amy S Colwell1, Oren Tessler, Alex M Lin, Eric Liao, Jonathan Winograd, Curtis L Cetrulo, Rong Tang, Barbara L Smith, William G Austen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy is increasingly used for treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Few data exist on risk factors for complications and reconstruction outcomes.
METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was performed between 2007 and 2012.
RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-five patients underwent 500 nipple-sparing mastectomy procedures for breast cancer (46 percent) or risk reduction (54 percent). The average body mass index was 24, and 6 percent were smokers. The mean follow-up was 2.17 years. Immediate breast reconstruction (reconstruction rate, 98.8 percent) was performed with direct-to-implant (59 percent), tissue expander/implant (38 percent), or autologous (2 percent) reconstruction. Acellular dermal matrix was used in 71 percent and mesh was used in 11 percent. Seventy-seven reconstructions had radiotherapy. Complications included infection (3.3 percent), skin necrosis (5.2 percent), nipple necrosis (4.4 percent), seroma (1.7 percent), hematoma (1.7 percent), and implant loss (1.9 percent). Positive predictors for total complications included smoking (OR, 3.3; 95 percent CI, 1.289 to 8.486) and periareolar incisions (OR, 3.63; 95 percent CI, 1.850 to 7.107). Increasing body mass index predicted skin necrosis (OR, 1.154; 95 percent CI, 1.036 to 1.286) and preoperative irradiation predicted nipple necrosis (OR, 4.86; 95 percent CI, 1.0197 to 23.169). An inframammary fold incision decreased complications (OR, 0.018; 95 percent CI, 0.0026 to 0.12089). Five-year trends showed increasing numbers of nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and more single-stage versus two-stage reconstructions (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Nipple-sparing mastectomy reconstructions have a low number of complications. Smoking, body mass index, preoperative irradiation, and incision type were predictors of complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24572843     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000438056.67375.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  70 in total

Review 1.  Anatomy relevant to conservative mastectomy.

Authors:  Rachel L O'Connell; Jennifer E Rusby
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Oncological safety of prophylactic breast surgery: skin-sparing and nipple-sparing versus total mastectomy.

Authors:  Victorien M T van Verschuer; Marike C Maijers; Carolien H M van Deurzen; Linetta B Koppert
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Sophocles H Voineskos; Simon G Frank; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

4.  Preoperative digital mammography imaging in conservative mastectomy and immediate reconstruction.

Authors:  Alberto Rancati; Claudio Angrigiani; Dennis Hammond; Maurizio Nava; Eduardo Gonzalez; Roman Rostagno; Gustavo Gercovich
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

Review 5.  Current strategies with 1-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Amy S Colwell
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

6.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Incisions for Cancer Extirpation Prospective Cohort Trial: Perfusion, Complications, and Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Odom; Rajiv P Parikh; Grace Um; Simone W Kantola; Amy E Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Nipple sparing mastectomy and the evolving direct to implant breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Gudjon Leifur Gunnarsson; Lene Nyhøj Heidemann; Camilla Bille; Jens Ahm Sørensen; Jørn Bo Thomsen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-06

8.  Utilizing large volume fat grafting in breast reconstruction after nipple sparing mastectomies.

Authors:  Ran Y Stark; Michael N Mirzabeigi; R Jason Vonderhaar; Louis P Bucky
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-06

9.  Nipple-sparing mastectomies: Clinical outcomes from a single academic institution.

Authors:  Barbara Dull; Leah Conant; Terence Myckatyn; Marissa Tenenbaum; Amy Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-04

10.  How to perform a NAC sparing mastectomy using an ADM and an implant.

Authors:  Gudjon Leifur Gunnarsson; Mikkel Børsen-Koch; Peter Wamberg; Jørn Bo Thomsen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.