Literature DB >> 24571571

Practice patterns when treating patients with low back pain: a survey of physical therapists.

Claire Davies1, Arthur J Nitz, Carl G Mattacola, Patrick Kitzman, Dana Howell, Kert Viele, David Baxter, Dorothy Brockopp.   

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP), is a common musculoskeletal problem, affecting 75-85% of adults in their lifetime. Direct costs of LBP in the USA were estimated over 85 billion dollars in 2005 resulting in a significant economic burden for the healthcare system. LBP classification systems and outcome measures are available to guide physical therapy assessments and intervention. However, little is known about which, if any, physical therapists use in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to identify the use of and barriers to LBP classification systems and outcome measures among physical therapists in one state. A mixed methods study using a cross-sectional cohort design with descriptive qualitative methods was performed. A survey collected both quantitative and qualitative data relevant to classification systems and outcome measures used by physical therapists working with patients with LBP. Physical therapists responded using classification systems designed to direct treatment predominantly. The McKenzie method was the most frequent approach to classify LBP. Barriers to use of classification systems and outcome measures were lack of knowledge, too limiting and time. Classification systems are being used for decision-making in physical therapy practice for patients with LBP. Lack of knowledge and training seems to be the main barrier to the use of classification systems in practice. The Oswestry Disability Index and Numerical Pain Scale were the most commonly used outcome measures. The main barrier to their use was lack of time. Continuing education and reading the literature were identified as important tools to teach evidence-based practice to physical therapists in practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification systems; low back pain; outcome measures

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24571571     DOI: 10.3109/09593985.2013.877547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract        ISSN: 0959-3985            Impact factor:   2.279


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of 2 Multimodal Interventions With and Without Whole Body Vibration Therapy Plus Traction on Pain and Disability in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Gianni F Maddalozzo; Brian Kuo; Walker A Maddalozzo; Conner D Maddalozzo; Johnny W Galver
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-08-25

2.  The most common classification in the mechanical diagnosis and therapy for patients with a primary complaint of non-acute knee pain was Spinal Derangement: a retrospective chart review.

Authors:  Sanshiro Hashimoto; Masatsugu Hirokado; Hiroshi Takasaki
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-09-12

3.  Habitual pelvic posture and time spent sitting: Measurement test-retest reliability for the LUMOback device and preliminary evidence for slouched posture in individuals with low back pain.

Authors:  Hiroshi Takasaki
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2017-09-18

4.  A preliminary analysis of outcomes and end range procedures used to achieve centralization in people with low back pain.

Authors:  Thomas Stowell; Ronald Schenk; Madeleine Hellman; Carlos Ladeira
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2017-09-04

5.  Mechanical diagnosis and therapy enhances attitude toward self-management in people with musculoskeletal disorders: A preliminary evidence with a before-after design.

Authors:  Hiroshi Takasaki
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2017-11-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.