BACKGROUND: Alopecia in captive primates continues to receive attention from animal care personnel and regulatory agencies. However, a method that enables personnel to reliably score alopecia over time and under various conditions has proven difficult to achieve. METHODS: The scoring system developed by the behavioral and veterinary staffs at the Washington National Primate Research Center (WaNPRC) uses the rule of 9s to estimate the percentage of the body affected with alopecia (severity) and how the alopecia presents itself (pattern). Training and scoring can conveniently be managed using photographic images, cage-side observations, and/or physical examinations. RESULTS: Personnel with varying degrees of experience were quickly trained with reliability scores ranging from 0.82 to 0.96 for severity and 0.82 to 0.89 for pattern using Cohen's κ. CONCLUSIONS: This system allows for reliable and consistent scoring across species, sex, age, housing condition, seasons, clinical or behavioral treatments, and level of personnel experience.
BACKGROUND: Alopecia in captive primates continues to receive attention from animal care personnel and regulatory agencies. However, a method that enables personnel to reliably score alopecia over time and under various conditions has proven difficult to achieve. METHODS: The scoring system developed by the behavioral and veterinary staffs at the Washington National Primate Research Center (WaNPRC) uses the rule of 9s to estimate the percentage of the body affected with alopecia (severity) and how the alopecia presents itself (pattern). Training and scoring can conveniently be managed using photographic images, cage-side observations, and/or physical examinations. RESULTS: Personnel with varying degrees of experience were quickly trained with reliability scores ranging from 0.82 to 0.96 for severity and 0.82 to 0.89 for pattern using Cohen's κ. CONCLUSIONS: This system allows for reliable and consistent scoring across species, sex, age, housing condition, seasons, clinical or behavioral treatments, and level of personnel experience.
Authors: Veronica Diaz-Peralta Horenstein; Lawrence E Williams; Alan R Brady; Christian R Abee; Marcelo G Horenstein Journal: Comp Med Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: Hanspeter W Steinmetz; Werner Kaumanns; Illona Dix; Michael Heistermann; Mark Fox; Franz-Josef Kaup Journal: J Med Primatol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 0.667
Authors: Kerith R Luchins; Kate C Baker; Margaret H Gilbert; James L Blanchard; David Xianhong Liu; Leann Myers; Rudolf P Bohm Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Amol P Yadav; Shuangyan Li; Max O Krucoff; Mikhail A Lebedev; Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr; Miguel A L Nicolelis Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 9.184