Literature DB >> 24571059

Economic analysis of aprepitant-containing regimen to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy in Hong Kong.

Stephen L Chan1, Jason Jen, Thomas Burke, James Pellissier.   

Abstract

AIM: We aim to evaluate the cost effectiveness of aprepitant-containing regimens for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) among patients receiving high emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) in Hong Kong.
METHODS: Both cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses were conducted utilizing a decision-analytic model to measure the economic costs and clinical outcomes associated with the aprepitant-containing regimen versus a standard regimen in the prevention of CINV. Analyses were conducted on the basis of four published double-blind randomized clinical trials involving different usages of serotonin receptor antagonists.
RESULTS: The use of aprepitant-containing regimens is associated with an improvement in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with non-aprepitant regimens. For cisplatin-based chemotherapy, the incremental cost per QALY gained is HKD 239,644 (1 USD approximates HKD 7.8) when ondansetron is administered on day 1 only. The incremental cost per QALY is HKD 440,950 when ondansetron is used on day 1 to 4. For anthracycline and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy, the aprepitant-containing regimen is associated with incremental cost of HKD 195,442 per QALY gained. Similar results were obtained when other 5HT3 receptor antagonists are used. The use of aprepitant was associated with higher cost of drug but lower costs of emesis-related management. With the cost-effectiveness threshold set at the World Health Organization endorsed criteria of three times gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (three times GDP per capita in Hong Kong in 2011 is HKD 798,078), the current analyses showed that the aprepitant-containing regimen was cost-effective.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing HEC, the use of aprepitant as the anti-emetic is cost-effective in Hong Kong.
© 2014 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hong Kong; aprepitant; cost-effectiveness; emesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24571059     DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1743-7555            Impact factor:   2.601


  10 in total

1.  Cost-utility analysis of aprepitant for patients who truly need it in Japan.

Authors:  Ikuto Tsukiyama; Masahiko Ando; Sumiyo Tsukiyama; Masayuki Takeuchi; Masayuki Ejiri; Yusuke Kurose; Hiroko Saito; Ichiro Arakawa; Tadao Inoue; Etsuro Yamaguchi; Akihito Kubo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  A cost-utility analysis of risk model-guided versus physician's choice antiemetic prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a net benefit regression approach.

Authors:  Kednapa Thavorn; Doug Coyle; Jeffrey S Hoch; Lisa Vandermeer; Sasha Mazzarello; Zhou Wang; George Dranitsaris; Dean Fergusson; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Phase II open label pilot trial of aprepitant and palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving moderately emetogenic FOLFOX chemotherapy for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Joseph S Bubalo; Jon D Herrington; Marc Takemoto; Patricia Willman; Michael S Edwards; Casey Williams; Alan Fisher; Alison Palumbo; Eric Chen; Charles Blanke; Charles D Lopez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Quality of pharmacoeconomic research in China: A systematic review.

Authors:  Huifen Ma; Weiyan Jian; Tingting Xu; Yasheng He; John A Rizzo; Hai Fang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Economic analysis of palonosetron versus granisetron in the standard triplet regimen for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy in Japan (TRIPLE phase III trial).

Authors:  Hisanori Shimizu; Kenichi Suzuki; Takeshi Uchikura; Daiki Tsuji; Takeharu Yamanaka; Hironobu Hashimoto; Koichi Goto; Reiko Matsui; Nobuhiko Seki; Toshikazu Shimada; Shunya Ikeda; Naoki Ikegami; Toshihiro Hama; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Tadanori Sasaki
Journal:  J Pharm Health Care Sci       Date:  2018-12-10

Review 6.  NK-1 Receptor Antagonists and Pruritus: Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Marcelina Pojawa-Gołąb; Kamila Jaworecka; Adam Reich
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2019-06-12

7.  Economic Value of Fosaprepitant-Containing Regimen in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in China: Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis.

Authors:  Xinglu Xu; Yuwen Bao; Kai Xu; Zhuolin Zhang; Ningli Zhao; Xin Li
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-12

8.  Applicability of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Guidelines for Prevention and Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Southeast Asia: A Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Alexandre Chan; Matin M Abdullah; Wan Zamaniah B Wan Ishak; Annielyn B Ong-Cornel; Antonio H Villalon; Ravindran Kanesvaran
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2016-11-09

Review 9.  Aprepitant for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Pruritus.

Authors:  Alice He; Jihad M Alhariri; Ronald J Sweren; Madan M Kwatra; Shawn G Kwatra
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Cost-effectiveness of aprepitant in Japanese patients treated with cisplatin-containing highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ikuto Tsukiyama; Shiori Hasegawa; Yoshiaki Ikeda; Masayuki Takeuchi; Sumiyo Tsukiyama; Yusuke Kurose; Masayuki Ejiri; Masaki Sakuma; Hiroko Saito; Ichiro Arakawa; Tadao Inoue; Etsuro Yamaguchi; Akihito Kubo
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.716

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.