A case of acute brachial artery occlusion after transradial coronary intervention.

In 2010, a 49-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with chest pain. Angiography via the radial approach was performed. Acute brachial artery occlusion was present after the procedure. By transcatheter thrombolysis, brachial artery occlusion was recanalized. Transcatheter thrombolysis seemed to be effective and safe.

Introduction

Artery occlusion can be a complication of transradial coronary angiography or intervention. Radial artery occlusion was usual with an incidence of 2-18% in the literature [1-4], which should in theory not endanger the viability of the hand because of double blood supply. In contrast, brachial artery occlusion was not reported, but can result in acute hand ischemia, even necrosis. Transcatheter thrombolysis was effective and safe, and can be used to recanalize the artery occlusion [5, 6].

The article first discusses transcatheter thrombolysis; it was effective and safe in the condition of acute brachial artery thrombosis after transradial intervention.

Case report

A 49-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital with chest pain that started 3 years prior to admission. He experienced squeezing anterior chest pain on exertion which lasted 4-5 min. He had no other concomitant symptoms, including syncope and amaurosis, and no history of hypertension, diabetes or sudden death of family members, with a history of prior smoking for more than ten years. Blood pressure at admission was 120/70 mm Hg. Physical examination revealed a systolic murmur at the left sternal border in the third to fourth intercostal space, with no conduction and tremor, which was more obvious with VALSALVA breathing. A standard 12-lead electrocardiogram showed ST-T wave changes in leads II, III and aVF with high voltage and negative T-waves in leads V1-V5. Echocardiography showed left ventricular hypertrophy, mild to moderate left ventricular outflow tract stenosis with a pressure gradient of 70 mm Hg, aortic valve calcification, and mild mitral regurgitation. Coronary angiography and left ventriculography via the radial approach were performed to identify. The patient had a positive Allen's test. Local anesthesia was 1 mll of lidocaine 2% administered 1 cm below the styloid process of the radius. The right radial artery was punctured with a puncture needle n0.21, and a 0.018” guidewire was introduced, followed by a 6 Fr sheath (TERUMO Co.) 23 cm long with an external diameter of 2.3 mm. After sheath insertion into the artery, 3000 IU of sodium heparin and a solution of 200 µg of nitroglycerin were administered. During catheterization, a 0.035” guidewire 260 cm long was positioned in the ascending aorta to exchange the catheters. Our choice was a 5 Fr Tig catheter for the left coronary artery, because it had extreme tortuosity in the right subclavian artery. In case of failure to curve for the right coronary artery, the 5 Fr Judkins 4 curve for the right coronary artery, and a 6 Fr pigtail catheter (CORDIS Co.) for the left ventricular were used. Coronary angiography revealed no significant stenosis. Left ventriculography showed the characteristics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; peak pressure gradient in the left ventricular outflow tract was 50 mm Hg by cardiac catheterization. After the end of the procedure, the sheath was removed slowly and progressively with monumental flow release through the radial artery. Hemostasis was achieved by application of occlusive tourniquets (Terumo TR Band) with gradual release of pressure for 6-8 h. Approximately 12 h after the diagnostic procedure, the patient complained of severe right upper limb swelling, pain, pallor, paresthesia, and pulselessness. The distal skin of the right upper limb was hypothermic and pale. The right radial and ulnar pulse had disappeared. The ultrasonographic examination demonstrated no flow of the right radial artery distal to the puncture site and thrombus in the right brachial artery. Considering acute ischemia of the right upper limb, time of onset < 3 days, we decided to treat with transcatheter thrombolysis. The catheter (YASHIRU) was placed in the right proximal axillary artery via the right femoral artery. Angiography showed decreased flow at the junction of the right brachial artery and the axillary artery, and disappeared flow in the distal brachial artery. Considering acute thrombosis in the right brachial artery (Figure 1), a super smooth guidewire was delivered through the occlusive thrombus, then placed the thrombolytic catheter (UniFuse) via the wire to the thrombus (Figure 2), continuous infusion of urokinase into the thrombus via minipump for 12 h with 80,000 U/h, thrombus disappeared, blood flow was smooth in right upper limb arteries after thrombolysis in angiography (Figure 3), and palmar arch was present (Figure 4).

Fig. 1

Angiography showed acute thrombosis of brachial artery

Fig. 2

Thrombolytic catheter into the thrombus

Fig. 3

Blood flow was smooth after thrombolysis in angiography

Fig. 4

Palmar arch was present

Discussion

The transradial approach is known as a convenient method for percutaneous coronary angiography with fewer bleeding complications and improved patient's comfort. However, thrombotic occlusion of the radial artery can occur as a complication of this procedure. The relative factors of occlusion might be the dosage of heparin during the procedure, the size and type of sheath, and the duration of pressure. Thrombotic occlusion of the vessel should in theory not endanger the viability of the hand if a double blood supply through the ulnar arch is present. Some patients showed spontaneous recanalization of radial artery occlusion in the follow-up period. In a study, Stella recorded that in 563 patients, 30 patients (5.3%) had clinical evidence of radial artery occlusion at discharge, but at 1-month follow-up, persistent occlusion was found only in 16 patients (2.8%) [7]. In the ACCESS study, the incidence of acute radial artery occlusion was 5%, while after 1 month the incidence was only 3% [8]. However, there was no previous report of brachial artery occlusion after cardiac catheterization in the literature. Because the separation of the brachial artery into the ulnar artery and the radial artery, supplying the forearm, brachial artery occlusion can lead to acute ischemia and necrosis.

In this case, the patient showed clinical evidence of brachial artery occlusion, confirmed by angiography. Thrombotic occlusion was relative to endothelial injury of the vessel in the procedure. Persistent brachial occlusion had clinical sequelae such as necrosis of the hand and even amputation.

The most commonly used treatments include: (1) intravenous thrombolysis, (2) embolectomy via Fogarty catheter, (3) surgical embolectomy, (4) transcatheter thrombolysis [5, 6]. Our choice was transcatheter thrombolysis because of its minimally invasive, thrombolytic effect, and fewer complications [9]. Especially for fresh thrombus, efficiency was better than old thrombosis. If a guide wire passed through the occlusion, the rate of successful thrombolysis was 92% [10].

Vascular endothelial injury resulting in acute brachial artery thrombosis was a possible complication of the transradial approach. Although acute brachial artery thrombosis after transradial intervention was rare, it had serious consequences. Therefore careful maneuvering of the catheter was warranted during the transradial approach. In addition, the use of thrombolytic agents via the catheter seemed to be effective and safe in conditions of acute brachial artery thrombosis after transradial intervention.