Literature DB >> 24570683

An unusual prostate-specific antigen decrease in an advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer patient with intracerebral hemorrhage subsequently treated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist.

Kouji Izumi1, Atsushi Mizokami1, Mikio Namiki1.   

Abstract

An unusual prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease in a Japanese patient with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) antagonist after cerebral bleeding was presented. There have been no previous reports that cerebral bleeding or trepanation/drainage of hematoma decreased PSA level, which would make this the first. The LH-RH antagonist may be only one reason for the PSA decrease. More cases need to be accumulated and and further investigation is needed to clarify if intracerebral bleeding or an LH-RH antagonist can decrease PSA in such advanced CRPC cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral bleeding; Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist; Prostate cancer

Year:  2013        PMID: 24570683      PMCID: PMC3924709          DOI: 10.1159/000357668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Nephrol Urol        ISSN: 1664-5510


Case Report

We experienced an unusual prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease in a Japanese patient with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The 63-year-old patient had a long history of prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 9 (5 + 4) and T3aN0M1b, and had already undergone treatment with combined androgen blockade, ethinylestradiol, prednisolone, estramustine phosphate, zoledronic acid, tranilast, tegafur uracil, docetaxel and strontium. At the maximum level of PSA (1,235 ng/ml), intracerebral bleeding occurred and the patient was hospitalized (fig. 1). Initially, the bleeding seemed to not be severe, so conservative therapy was performed. However, the bleeding began to increase, so trepanation with drainage for cerebral hematoma was performed by neurosurgeons (fig. 1). The PSA level decreased slightly following drainage. Two weeks after drainage, we replaced the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist with the LH-RH antagonist, degarelix. Surprisingly, the PSA level began to decrease from 873 ng/ml at the time of the first degarelix injection, with a level of 540 ng/ml attained after 4 weeks. During hospitalization, the treatment for prostate cancer was not changed except for the LH-RH antagonist injection. Unfortunately, the patient's condition deteriorated again with intracerebral bleeding, mydriasis and loss of light reflex, and he died 58 days after hospitalization.
Fig. 1

The change in PSA levels is shown. The picture (left) shows cerebral bleeding before surgery. The arrowheads indicate specific events. A: combined androgen blockade is started, B: docetaxel administration is started, C: intracerebral bleeding occurs, D: trepanation is performed for cerebral hematoma, E: degarelix treatment is started, F: mydriasis and loss of light reflex are detected and G: the patient dies.

Discussion

To our knowledge, there have been no previous reports that cerebral bleeding or trepanation/drainage of hematoma cause a decrease in the level of PSA. However, various acute insults induce a decrease of sex steroids and gonadotropins [1]. Low testosterone and luteinizing hormone are commonly observed in men who suffer burns [2, 3]. Similarly, 39% of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke patients have been found to have hypogonadism with a low testosterone level [4]. Though it is likely that the intracerebral bleeding affected the PSA level in our case, the decrease may also have been a fluctuation; it is not clear if the testosterone level of this CRPC patient treated with combined androgen blockade could have been reduced more by the intracerebral bleeding. The LH-RH antagonist may have contributed to the 56% decrease in PSA, from 1,235 to 540 ng/ml. Two previous studies indicated that switching from LH-RH agonist to LH-RH antagonist could decrease PSA levels in CRPC patients [5, 6]. Degarelix, which is a recently developed LH-RH antagonist, showed a significantly lower risk of PSA progression or death in a certain population when compared with the LH-RH agonist [7]. The difference in effect between LH-RH agonist and antagonist could be explained by (1) a loss of testosterone surge or a reduction of testosterone, (2) the suppression of follicle-stimulating hormone and (3) a direct effect of the LH-RH antagonist on the LH-RH receptors in the prostate cancer cells [2]. A previous study indicated the possibility of a slight change in testosterone level being a cause of PSA decrease [5]. However, PSA levels in these previous studies were 3–60 ng/ml upon commencement of LH-RH antagonist administration [5, 6]. Our case showed a PSA level of 873 ng/ml when the LH-RH antagonist treatment was started, which is the highest level reported to date. The PSA level decrease in this case may therefore have been caused not only by the testosterone level but other mechanisms as well. Unfortunately, we did not measure either testosterone or follicle-stimulating hormone because we did not expect such a decrease in the level of the PSA. Our case demonstrated the therapeutic potential of LH-RH antagonist to decrease PSA level in advanced CRPC patients. However, a previous report indicated that switching from LH-RH agonist to antagonist decreased PSA levels in only 3 of 17 prostate cancer patients [5]. Although it is necessary to still investigate the application of switching from LH-RH agonist to LH-RH antagonist because of not much evidence, patients who have already undergone all available treatments, as in this particular case, may be eligible candidates for this approach.
  7 in total

1.  Endocrine alterations in critically ill patients with stroke during the early recovery period.

Authors:  Ioanna Dimopoulou; Andreas T Kouyialis; Stylianos Orfanos; Apostolos Armaganidis; Marinella Tzanela; Nikolaos Thalassinos; Stylianos Tsagarakis
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Response to degarelix after resistance to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist therapy for metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ryan S Raddin; Christine M Walko; Young E Whang
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.248

3.  A switch from GnRH agonist to GnRH antagonist in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients leads to a low response rate on PSA.

Authors:  Alexandra Masson-Lecomte; Laurent Guy; Philippe Pedron; Franck Bruyere; Morgan Rouprêt; Bonaventure Nsabimbona; Mickael Dahan; Patrice Hoffman; Laurent Salomon; Dimitri Vordos; Andras Hoznek; Philippe Le Corvoisier; Pierrick Morel; Claude Abbou; Alexandre de la Taille
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  The endocrine response to critical illness.

Authors:  C A Rolih; K P Ober
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.456

5.  Additional analysis of the secondary end point of biochemical recurrence rate in a phase 3 trial (CS21) comparing degarelix 80 mg versus leuprolide in prostate cancer patients segmented by baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Bertrand Tombal; Kurt Miller; Laurent Boccon-Gibod; Fritz Schröder; Neal Shore; E David Crawford; Judd Moul; Jens-Kristian Jensen; Tine Kold Olesen; Bo-Eric Persson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Pituitary-testicular axis dysfunction in burned men.

Authors:  A V Vogel; G T Peake; R T Rada
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Transient hypogonadotropic hypogonadism caused by critical illness.

Authors:  P D Woolf; R W Hamill; J V McDonald; L A Lee; M Kelly
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.958

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.