Literature DB >> 24570247

Patterns and outcomes of red blood cell transfusion in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Matthew W Sherwood1, Yongfei Wang2, Jeptha P Curtis2, Eric D Peterson1, Sunil V Rao1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Studies have shown variation in the use of red blood cell transfusion among patients with acute coronary syndromes. There are no definitive data for the efficacy of transfusion in improving outcomes, and concerning data exist about possible association with harm. Current transfusion practices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are not well understood.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the current patterns of blood transfusion among patients undergoing PCI and the association of transfusion with adverse cardiac outcomes across hospitals in the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of all patient visits from the CathPCI Registry from July 2009 to March 2013 that included PCI, excluding those with missing data on bleeding complications or who underwent in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery (N = 2,258,711 visits). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Transfusion rates in the overall population and by hospital (N = 1431) were the primary outcomes. The association of transfusion with myocardial infarction, stroke, and death after accounting for a patient's propensity for transfusion was also measured.
RESULTS: The overall rate of transfusion was 2.14% (95% CI, 2.13%-2.16%) and quarterly transfusion rates slightly declined from July 2009 to March 2013 (from 2.11% [95% CI, 2.03%-2.19%] to 2.04% [95% CI, 1.97%-2.12%]; P < .001). Patients who were more likely to receive transfusion were older (mean, 70.5 vs 64.6 years), were women (56.3% vs 32.5%), and had hypertension (86.4% vs 82.0%), diabetes (44.8% vs 34.6%), advanced renal dysfunction (8.7% vs 2.3%), prior myocardial infarction (33.0% vs 30.2%), or prior heart failure (27.0% vs 11.8%). Overall, 96.3% of sites gave a transfusion to less than 5% of patients and 3.7% of sites gave a transfusion to 5% of patients or more. Variation in hospital risk-standardized rates of transfusion persisted after adjustment, and hospitals showed variability in their transfusion thresholds. Receipt of transfusion was associated with myocardial infarction (42,803 events; 4.5% vs 1.8%; odds ratio [OR], 2.60; 95% CI, 2.57-2.63), stroke (5011 events; 2.0% vs 0.2%; OR, 7.72; 95% CI, 7.47-7.98), and in-hospital death (31,885 events; 12.5% vs 1.2%; OR, 4.63; 95% CI, 4.57-4.69), irrespective of bleeding complications. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients undergoing PCI at US hospitals, there was considerable variation in blood transfusion practices, and receipt of transfusion was associated with increased risk of in-hospital adverse cardiac events. These observational findings may warrant a randomized trial of transfusion strategies for patients undergoing PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24570247      PMCID: PMC4276400          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  28 in total

1.  Liberal or restrictive transfusion in high-risk patients after hip surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Carson; Michael L Terrin; Helaine Noveck; David W Sanders; Bernard R Chaitman; George G Rhoads; George Nemo; Karen Dragert; Lauren Beaupre; Kevin Hildebrand; William Macaulay; Courtland Lewis; Donald Richard Cook; Gwendolyn Dobbin; Khwaja J Zakriya; Fred S Apple; Rebecca A Horney; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Is old blood bad blood?

Authors:  Sunil V Rao; Robert M Califf
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Association of blood transfusion with increased mortality in myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and diversity-adjusted study sequential analysis.

Authors:  Saurav Chatterjee; Jørn Wetterslev; Abhishek Sharma; Edgar Lichstein; Debabrata Mukherjee
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Eric D Peterson; David Dai; Elizabeth R DeLong; J Matthew Brennan; Mandeep Singh; Sunil V Rao; Richard E Shaw; Matthew T Roe; Kalon K L Ho; Lloyd W Klein; Ronald J Krone; William S Weintraub; Ralph G Brindis; John S Rumsfeld; John A Spertus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  The impact of anemia on long-term clinical outcome in patients undergoing revascularization with the unrestricted use of drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Thomas Pilgrim; Florian Vetterli; Bindu Kalesan; Giulio G Stefanini; Lorenz Räber; Stefan Stortecky; Steffen Gloekler; Ronald K Binder; Peter Wenaweser; Aris Moschovitis; Ahmed A Khattab; Lutz Buellesfeld; Marcel Zwahlen; Bernhard Meier; Peter Jüni; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 6.546

6.  Conservative versus liberal red cell transfusion in acute myocardial infarction (the CRIT Randomized Pilot Study).

Authors:  Howard A Cooper; Sunil V Rao; Michael D Greenberg; Maria P Rumsey; Marcus McKenzie; Kirsten W Alcorn; Julio A Panza
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-24       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Association between use of bleeding avoidance strategies and risk of periprocedural bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Steven P Marso; Amit P Amin; John A House; Kevin F Kennedy; John A Spertus; Sunil V Rao; David J Cohen; John C Messenger; John S Rumsfeld
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Red blood cell transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB*.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Carson; Brenda J Grossman; Steven Kleinman; Alan T Tinmouth; Marisa B Marques; Mark K Fung; John B Holcomb; Orieji Illoh; Lewis J Kaplan; Louis M Katz; Sunil V Rao; John D Roback; Aryeh Shander; Aaron A R Tobian; Robert Weinstein; Lisa Grace Swinton McLaughlin; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  The NCDR CathPCI Registry: a US national perspective on care and outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Issam Moussa; Anthony Hermann; John C Messenger; Gregory J Dehmer; W Douglas Weaver; John S Rumsfeld; Frederick A Masoudi
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Liberal versus restrictive transfusion thresholds for patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Carson; Maria Mori Brooks; J Dawn Abbott; Bernard Chaitman; Sheryl F Kelsey; Darrell J Triulzi; Vankeepuram Srinivas; Mark A Menegus; Oscar C Marroquin; Sunil V Rao; Helaine Noveck; Elizabeth Passano; Regina M Hardison; Thomas Smitherman; Tudor Vagaonescu; Neil J Wimmer; David O Williams
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  17 in total

1.  Marker or mediator? Is the link between anemia and outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease growing any clearer?

Authors:  Adam C Salisbury
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Impact of red blood cell transfusion on acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yushu Wang; Xiuli Shi; Rongsheng Du; Yucheng Chen; Qing Zhang
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Continued decline in blood collection and transfusion in the United States-2015.

Authors:  Katherine D Ellingson; Mathew R P Sapiano; Kathryn A Haass; Alexandra A Savinkina; Misha L Baker; Koo-Whang Chung; Richard A Henry; James J Berger; Matthew J Kuehnert; Sridhar V Basavaraju
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 4.  Risks of restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD): a meta-analysis.

Authors:  I Cortés-Puch; B M Wiley; J Sun; H G Klein; J Welsh; R L Danner; P Q Eichacker; C Natanson
Journal:  Transfus Med       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.019

5.  Declining blood collection and utilization in the United States.

Authors:  Koo-Whang Chung; Sridhar V Basavaraju; Yi Mu; Katharina L van Santen; Kathryn A Haass; Richard Henry; James Berger; Matthew J Kuehnert
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Expanding restrictive transfusion evidence in surgical practice: a multicentre, prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Zixing Wang; Yuguang Huang; Yipeng Wang; Zhong Liu; Shijie Xin; Guanghua Lei; Wei Han; Xuerong Yu; Fang Xue; Yali Chen; Peng Wu; Jingmei Jiang; Xiaochu Yu
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 5.752

7.  Investigating the association between blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a data linkage approach to Patient Blood Management.

Authors:  Guilherme S Franco; Julie Li; Ling Li; Mark Dean; Grant Shalaby; Andrew Georgiou
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 8.  Restrictive and liberal red cell transfusion strategies in adult patients: reconciling clinical data with best practice.

Authors:  Marek A Mirski; Steven M Frank; Daryl J Kor; Jean-Louis Vincent; David R Holmes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Harms associated with single unit perioperative transfusion: retrospective population based analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Whitlock; Helen Kim; Andrew D Auerbach
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-06-12

10.  Clinical factors influencing the decision to transfuse after percutaneous native kidney biopsy.

Authors:  William L Whittier; Khaleel Sayeed; Stephen M Korbet
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2015-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.