BACKGROUND: Better understanding of the brain regions involved in performing laparoscopic surgery is likely to provide important insights for improving laparoscopic training and assessment in the future. To our knowledge, this is the first study using real Fundamentals of Laparoscopy Training (FLS)-based laparoscopic surgery training tasks in the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) environment to provide extensive characterization of the brain regions involved in this specific task execution. METHODS: Nine right-handed subjects practiced five FLS-modified laparoscopic surgery-training tasks with a training box for ten sessions in a simulated fMRI environment. Following the last practice session, they underwent 3 T fMRI while performing each task. RESULTS: An increase in the extent of brain activation was observed as the complexity of the tasks increased. Activation in the precentral gyrus, postcentral gyrus, and premotor regions was observed in the performance of all tasks, whereas the superior parietal lobe (SPL) was activated in the more complex tasks. The mean score and brain activation for performance with the dominant hand were larger than those observed during performance with the non-dominant hand. CONCLUSIONS: Performing more complex tasks requires higher visual spatial ability and motor planning. Given the need for ambidextrous skills during laparoscopic tasks, the finding that lower scores and smaller brain recruitment occurred in executing tasks with the non-dominant hand than with the dominant hand suggests designing future training tasks to train the non-dominant hand more effectively. This may serve to improve overall performance in bi-manual tasks. Studies of this kind may facilitate the evidence-based development of strategies to improve the quality of laparoscopy training and assessment.
BACKGROUND: Better understanding of the brain regions involved in performing laparoscopic surgery is likely to provide important insights for improving laparoscopic training and assessment in the future. To our knowledge, this is the first study using real Fundamentals of Laparoscopy Training (FLS)-based laparoscopic surgery training tasks in the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) environment to provide extensive characterization of the brain regions involved in this specific task execution. METHODS: Nine right-handed subjects practiced five FLS-modified laparoscopic surgery-training tasks with a training box for ten sessions in a simulated fMRI environment. Following the last practice session, they underwent 3 T fMRI while performing each task. RESULTS: An increase in the extent of brain activation was observed as the complexity of the tasks increased. Activation in the precentral gyrus, postcentral gyrus, and premotor regions was observed in the performance of all tasks, whereas the superior parietal lobe (SPL) was activated in the more complex tasks. The mean score and brain activation for performance with the dominant hand were larger than those observed during performance with the non-dominant hand. CONCLUSIONS: Performing more complex tasks requires higher visual spatial ability and motor planning. Given the need for ambidextrous skills during laparoscopic tasks, the finding that lower scores and smaller brain recruitment occurred in executing tasks with the non-dominant hand than with the dominant hand suggests designing future training tasks to train the non-dominant hand more effectively. This may serve to improve overall performance in bi-manual tasks. Studies of this kind may facilitate the evidence-based development of strategies to improve the quality of laparoscopy training and assessment.
Authors: Malia F Mason; Michael I Norton; John D Van Horn; Daniel M Wegner; Scott T Grafton; C Neil Macrae Journal: Science Date: 2007-01-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Daniel Richard Leff; Clare E Elwell; Felipe Orihuela-Espina; Louis Atallah; David T Delpy; Ara W Darzi; Guang Zhong Yang Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-10-25 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Parisa Bahrami; Tom A Schweizer; Fred Tam; Teodor P Grantcharov; Michael D Cusimano; Simon J Graham Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Theodoor E Nieboer; Vicdan Sari; Kirsten B Kluivers; Martin J N Weinans; Mark E Vierhout; Dick F Stegeman Journal: Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 2.442
Authors: Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Ellen Kok; Anique B De Bruin; Koos van Geel; Andreas Gegenfurtner; Ide Heyligers; Bettina Sorger Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Ahmed Mohammed Balkhoyor; Muhammad Awais; Shekhar Biyani; Alexandre Schaefer; Matt Craddock; Olivia Jones; Michael Manogue; Mark A Mon-Williams; Faisal Mushtaq Journal: BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol Date: 2020-11-09