B L Mulherin, C J Snyder1, J W Soukup, S Hetzel. 1. Christopher J. Snyder, DVM, DAVDC, Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Veterinary Medicine, 2015 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, United States, Phone: +1 608 890 0906, Fax: +1 608 263 7930, E-mail: csnyderdvm@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine differences in signalment between maxillomandibular (MM) and non-maxillomandibular (non-MM) trauma patients to help predict the type of injury sustained. METHODS: A medical records database was searched from December 2003 to September 2012 to identify all MM trauma patients. A random sample of non-MM trauma patients was generated for comparison. Patient species, age, sex, weight, and injury aetiology were recorded for both populations. RESULTS: Sixty-seven MM trauma patients and 129 non-MM trauma patients were identified. Feline patients were almost twice as likely to be presented for MM trauma compared with non-MM trauma. The median weight of canine patients suffering MM injury was significantly less than that of non-MM patients (p = 0.025). A significant association existed between the causes of injuries associated with MM and non-MM trauma populations (p = 0.000023). The MM trauma patients were more likely to sustain injury as a result of an animal altercation (Bonferroni p = 0.001) while non-MM injuries were more likely to result from motor vehicle accidents (Bonferroni p = 0.001). Overall, animals that were less than one year of age with traumatic injuries were overrepresented (65/196) in comparison to the entire patient population. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study may help guide clinicians in the evaluation and screening of trauma patients that are presented as an emergency. Cats, small dogs and animals suffering from animal altercations should all be closely evaluated for MM injury.
OBJECTIVES: To determine differences in signalment between maxillomandibular (MM) and non-maxillomandibular (non-MM) traumapatients to help predict the type of injury sustained. METHODS: A medical records database was searched from December 2003 to September 2012 to identify all MM traumapatients. A random sample of non-MM traumapatients was generated for comparison. Patient species, age, sex, weight, and injury aetiology were recorded for both populations. RESULTS: Sixty-seven MM traumapatients and 129 non-MM traumapatients were identified. Feline patients were almost twice as likely to be presented for MM trauma compared with non-MM trauma. The median weight of caninepatients suffering MM injury was significantly less than that of non-MM patients (p = 0.025). A significant association existed between the causes of injuries associated with MM and non-MM trauma populations (p = 0.000023). The MM traumapatients were more likely to sustain injury as a result of an animal altercation (Bonferroni p = 0.001) while non-MM injuries were more likely to result from motor vehicle accidents (Bonferroni p = 0.001). Overall, animals that were less than one year of age with traumatic injuries were overrepresented (65/196) in comparison to the entire patient population. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study may help guide clinicians in the evaluation and screening of traumapatients that are presented as an emergency. Cats, small dogs and animals suffering from animal altercations should all be closely evaluated for MM injury.
Authors: Fernanda M Lopes; Marco Antonio Gioso; Daniel G Ferro; Marco A Leon-Roman; Michèle A F A Venturini; Herbert L Correa Journal: J Vet Dent Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 0.857
Authors: D Vnuk; B Pirkić; D Maticić; B Radisić; M Stejskal; T Babić; M Kreszinger; N Lemo Journal: J Feline Med Surg Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 2.015