| Literature DB >> 24569695 |
S G Fillman1, D Sinclair2, S J Fung1, M J Webster3, C Shannon Weickert1.
Abstract
Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder share a number of common features, both symptomatically and biologically. Abnormalities in the neuroimmune and the stress-signaling pathways have been previously identified in brains of individuals with both diseases. However, the possible relationship between abnormalities in stress and neuroimmune signaling within the cortex of people with psychotic illness has not been defined. To test the hypothesis that combined alterations in brain stress responsiveness and neuroimmune/inflammatory status are characteristic of some individuals suffering from major mental illness, we examined gene expression in the Stanley Array Cohort of 35 controls, 35 individuals with schizophrenia and 34 individuals with bipolar disorder. We used levels of 8 inflammatory-related transcripts, of which SERPINA3 was significantly elevated in individuals with schizophrenia (F(2,88)=4.137, P<0.05), and 12 glucocorticoid receptor signaling (stress) pathway transcripts previously examined, to identify two clusters of individuals: a high inflammation/stress group (n=32) and a low (n=68) inflammation/stress group. The high inflammation/stress group has a significantly greater number of individuals with schizophrenia (n=15), and a trend toward having more bipolar disorder individuals (n=11), when compared with controls (n=6). Using these subgroups, we tested which microarray-assessed transcriptional changes may be associated with high inflammatory/stress groups using ingenuity analysis and found that an extended network of gene expression changes involving immune, growth factors, inhibitory signaling and cell death factors also distinguished these groups. Our work demonstrates that some of the heterogeneity in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder may be partially explained by inflammation/stress interactions, and that this biological subtype cuts across Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-defined categories.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24569695 PMCID: PMC3944638 DOI: 10.1038/tp.2014.8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Psychiatry ISSN: 2158-3188 Impact factor: 6.222
Demographic details of the schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and control cases in the Stanley Array Cohort
| Diagnostic subtype | — | BP1=27, BP2=4, BPNOS=2, schizoaffective=1 | SCZ(disorganized)=1, SCZ(paranoid)=8, SCZ(undifferentiated)=26 |
| Age (years) | 44.2 (31–60) | 45.4 (19–64) | 42.6 (19–59) |
| Gender | 9F, 26M | 18F, 16M | 9F, 26M |
| Hemisphere | 16L, 19R | 19L, 15R | 17L, 18R |
| pH | 6.61±0.27 | 6.43±0.30 | 6.48±0.24 |
| PMI (hours) | 29.4±12.9 | 37.9±18.6 | 31.4±15.5 |
| RIN | 7.23±0.87 | 7.34±0.88 | 7.36±0.61 |
| Manner of death | Natural=35 | Natural=19, suicide=15 | Natural=28, suicide=7 |
| Age of onset (years) | — | 25.3±9.2 | 21.3±6.1 |
| Duration of illness (years) | — | 20.2±9.6 | 21.3±10.2 |
| Lifetime antipsychotics (fluphenazine equiv., mg) | — | 10 212±22 871 | 85 004±100 335 |
| Antidepressant use | Yes=0, no=35 | Yes=19, no=15 | Yes=9, no=26 |
| Type of antidepressant | — | SSRI=9 (fluoxetine=5), SNRI=4, SARI=5, TCA=6, other=1 | SSRI=4 (fluoxetine=2), SNRI=0, SARI=2, TCA=2, other=2 |
| Smoking around time of death | Yes=9, no=9, unknown=17 | Yes=15, no=6, unknown=13 | Yes=23, no=4, unknown=8 |
Abbreviations: BP1, bipolar disorder type 1; BP2, bipolar disorder type 2; BPNOS, bipolar disorder not otherwise specified; F, female; L, left; M, male; PMI, post-mortem interval; R, right; RIN, RNA integrity number; SARI, serotonin antagonist and reuptake inhibitor; SCZ, schizophrenia; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; SNRI, serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; TCA, tricyclic antidepressant.
Some individuals took multiple antidepressant medications. Data quoted are mean (range)±s.d.
Figure 1Quantitative PCR (qPCR) measured mRNA expression for inflammatory-associated genes (a) and cytokine-associated genes (b). Controls (blue) and individuals with bipolar disorder (green) and schizophrenia (red) are plotted with median values represented by the black line. All values with the exception of PTGS2 are plotted on a log-transformed scale because of their distribution.
Figure 2A series of recursive two-step cluster analyses yields different breakdowns in each diagnosis category. Three clustering operations were performed on only the inflammatory-related genes ((a), top row), stress-related genes ((a), middle row) and then both sets of genes combined ((a), bottom row). Each diagnosis is split between those in the high group ((a), darker color) and the low group ((a), lighter color). Controls (blue), bipolar disorder (green) and schizophrenia (red) are shown in the first, second and third columns, respectively. To examine the overlap of the inflammation ((b), x axis and right rear wall) and stress clusters ((b), z axis and left rear wall) with respect to diagnosis (blue, green and red color scheme), they were plotted in the form of a three-dimensional bar graph. Using the same values as b, the third, combined stress and inflammation cluster is represented by a separate color code, with blue representing low inflammation/stress and yellow high inflammation/stress (c). This indicates that the dichotomous group variables of inflammation and stress are a good, but not perfect, predictor of membership in the combined inflammation/stress group defined by clustered by the 19 continuous mRNA values.
Figure 3A recursive two-step clustering incorporating stress as well as inflammatory gene-related results in two groups that we titled high inflammation/stress and low inflammation/stress with relation to their inflammatory and stress signaling components. Individuals with bipolar disorder (green) and schizophrenia (red) are plotted relative to the mean expression of the low inflammation/stress control group (black-dashed line at one) on a log scale with s.e.m. represented by error bars. The blue rectangle represents the genes incorporated into the combined inflammatory/stress clustering model. Genes are ordered relative to their contribution to the model decreasing from left to right.
Figure 4The top ingenuity identified network that was enriched for the 57 genes that were significantly differentially expressed, after false discovery rate (FDR) correction, between high inflammation/stress individuals with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia as compared with low inflammation/stress controls. The initial microarray data were taken from a geometric mean of four separate experiments performed on the same Stanley Array Collection that we used in this current study. On the left side of each gene is the significance and fold change for bipolar disorder (when compared with low inflammation/stress controls). On the right side of each gene is the significance and fold change for schizophrenia. Fold changes are represented by intensity of color with green showing a decreased expression in the disease state compared with controls, whereas red indicates an increased expression in the disease state high inflammation/stress group as compared with the low inflammation/stress controls. Significance of these fold changes as assayed by t-tests are the following: *P<0.05, **P<0.001, ***P<0.0001, ****P<0.00001.