Literature DB >> 24569572

Predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality after transvenous lead extraction: a single-centre experience.

Sebastiaan Deckx1, Thomas Marynissen1, Filip Rega2, Joris Ector3, Dieter Nuyens3, Hein Heidbuchel3, Rik Willems4.   

Abstract

AIMS: Owing to the increasing use of cardiac implantable electronic devices, there is a growing need for safe and effective techniques to manage device-related complications and lead dysfunction. Lead extraction remains a challenging procedure with inherent risks. We present the 30-day and long-term outcomes of lead extractions in the University Hospitals Leuven. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We report a retrospective cohort study of 176 patients admitted to the University Hospitals Leuven between January 2005 and December 2011, for the transvenous extraction of 295 leads. Indications for extraction were lead dysfunction and device upgrade in 84 (47.7%), pocket infection in 61 (34.7%), and systemic infection in 31 patients (17.6%). Extraction was successful in 95.5% of patients with complete removal of the leads or only a minor fragment remaining. One fatal peri-procedural complication occurred. Thirty-day mortality was 3.4% (n = 6). Systemic infection was the only significant predictor of 30-day mortality [odds ratio (OR) 29.706; P = 0.029]. A lower level of haemoglobin prior to extraction also tended to be related with a higher mortality, but this was not significant (OR 2.024; P = 0.082). One-year mortality was 8.5% (n = 15). Systemic infection (OR 9.727; P = 0.009), a lower level of haemoglobin (OR 1.597; P = 0.05), and a higher level of ureum (OR 1.021; P = 0.017) prior to extraction were significant predictors of 1-year mortality. Systemic infection was associated with significantly higher 30-day (19%), 1-year (32%), and long-term (39%) mortality rates.
CONCLUSION: Lead extraction can be safely and successfully performed in the majority of patients, with limited life-threatening complications. However, lead extraction because of systemic infection is associated with a significantly higher risk of short- and long-term mortality. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices; Lead extraction; Mortality; Risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24569572     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  7 in total

1.  Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients at Risk.

Authors:  Khaldoun G Tarakji; Christopher R Ellis; Pascal Defaye; Charles Kennergren
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-05

2.  Risk Factors for Mortality in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jinghao Nicholas Ngiam; Tze Sian Liong; Meng Ying Sim; Nicholas W S Chew; Ching-Hui Sia; Siew Pang Chan; Toon Wei Lim; Tiong-Cheng Yeo; Paul Anantharajah Tambyah; Poay Huan Loh; Kian Keong Poh; William K F Kong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Lead Extraction of Cardiac Rhythm Devices: A Report of a Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Ana Isabel Azevedo; João Primo; Helena Gonçalves; Marco Oliveira; Luís Adão; Elisabeth Santos; José Ribeiro; Marlene Fonseca; Adelaide V Dias; Luís Vouga; Vasco Gama Ribeiro
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-04-13

4.  Prognosis after lead extraction in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices infection: Comparison of lead-related infective endocarditis with pocket infection in a Japanese single-center experience.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Nishii; Yoshimasa Morimoto; Akihito Miyoshi; Saori Tsukuda; Masakazu Miyamoto; Satoshi Kawada; Koji Nakagawa; Atsuyuki Watanabe; Kazufumi Nakamura; Hiroshi Morita; Hiroshi Morimatsu; Nobuchika Kusano; Shingo Kasahara; Morio Shoda; Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2019-06-28

5.  Safety and Efficacy of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Extraction in Elderly Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrew Y Lin; Florentino Lupercio; Gordon Ho; Travis Pollema; Victor Pretorius; Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2020-08-04

6.  Prognostic Value of Preoperative Echocardiographic Findings in Patients Undergoing Transvenous Lead Extraction.

Authors:  Dorota Nowosielecka; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Łukasz Tułecki; Andrzej Kleinrok; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Analysis of Outcomes in 8304 Patients Undergoing Lead Extraction for Infection.

Authors:  Ryan G Aleong; Matthew M Zipse; Christine Tompkins; Muhammad Aftab; Paul Varosy; William Sauer; David Kao
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 5.501

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.