F Conti 1 , C Perricone 2 , G Reboldi 3 , M Gawlicki 4 , I Bartosiewicz 2 , V A Pacucci 2 , L Massaro 2 , F Miranda 2 , S Truglia 2 , C Alessandri 2 , F R Spinelli 2 , L-S Teh 5 , F Ceccarelli 2 , G Valesini 2 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to assess the validity of a linguistically validated version of the Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL(©)) in Italian patients affected by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Consecutive SLE patients completed the Italian version of the LupusQoL(©) and the Short Form (SF)-36. Disease activity was evaluated by the SLE disease activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2 K), and chronic damage by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College Rheumatology (ACR) Damage Index score (SDI). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity were examined. Factor analysis with varimax rotation was performed. RESULTS: A total of 117 Italian SLE patients (M:F 13:104; mean age 40.6 ± 11.6 years, mean disease duration 127.5 ± 94.1 months) were recruited into the study. The Italian version of the LupusQoL(©) demonstrated substantial evidence of convergent validity in these patients when compared with equivalent items of the SF-36. In addition, the LupusQoL(©) discriminated between patients with different degrees of disease activity as measured by the SLEDAI-2 K. SLE patients with higher disease activity (SLEDAI-2K ≥4) showed poor QoL compared with those with lower disease activity (SLEDAI-2K <4), with significant differences in the domains of physical health, planning, burden to others and fatigue (p = 0.001, p = 0.04, p = 0.03, p = 0.04, respectively). The confirmatory factor analysis using the eight domain loadings of the 34 items showed a poor fit (χ(2)/degree of freedom (df) 2.26, χ(2 )= 1128.6 (p < 0.001), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.167; goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = 0.606, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.649)). Screeplot analysis suggested a five-factor loading structure and confirmatory factor analysis result of which is similar to the eight-factor model. A good internal consistency was observed (Cronbach's α 0.89-0.91). Test-retest reliability was good to excellent between baseline and day 15 (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.90-0.98). CONCLUSION: The Italian version of the LupusQoL(©) is a valid tool for adult patients with SLE.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to assess the validity of a linguistically validated version of the Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL(©)) in Italian patients affected by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE ). METHODS: Consecutive SLE patients completed the Italian version of the LupusQoL(©) and the Short Form (SF)-36. Disease activity was evaluated by the SLE disease activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2 K), and chronic damage by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College Rheumatology (ACR) Damage Index score (SDI). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity were examined. Factor analysis with varimax rotation was performed. RESULTS: A total of 117 Italian SLE patients (M:F 13:104; mean age 40.6 ± 11.6 years, mean disease duration 127.5 ± 94.1 months) were recruited into the study. The Italian version of the LupusQoL(©) demonstrated substantial evidence of convergent validity in these patients when compared with equivalent items of the SF-36. In addition, the LupusQoL(©) discriminated between patients with different degrees of disease activity as measured by the SLEDAI-2 K. SLE patients with higher disease activity (SLEDAI-2K ≥4) showed poor QoL compared with those with lower disease activity (SLEDAI-2K <4), with significant differences in the domains of physical health, planning, burden to others and fatigue (p = 0.001, p = 0.04, p = 0.03, p = 0.04, respectively). The confirmatory factor analysis using the eight domain loadings of the 34 items showed a poor fit (χ(2)/degree of freedom (df) 2.26, χ(2 )= 1128.6 (p < 0.001), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.167; goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = 0.606, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.649)). Screeplot analysis suggested a five-factor loading structure and confirmatory factor analysis result of which is similar to the eight-factor model. A good internal consistency was observed (Cronbach's α 0.89-0.91). Test-retest reliability was good to excellent between baseline and day 15 (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.90-0.98). CONCLUSION: The Italian version of the LupusQoL(©) is a valid tool for adult patients with SLE .
© The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.
Entities: Disease
Species
Keywords:
Autoimmunity; LupusQoL; SF-36; autoantibodies; lupus; quality of life; systemic lupus erythematosus
Mesh： See more »
Year: 2014
PMID： 24569393 DOI： 10.1177/0961203314524466
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lupus ISSN： 0961-2033 Impact factor: 2.911