Susan M B Morton1, Bianca L De Stavola2, David A Leon2. 1. Centre for Longitudinal Research & School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKCentre for Longitudinal Research & School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK s.morton@auckland.ac.nz. 2. Centre for Longitudinal Research & School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Size at birth has taken on renewed significance due to its now well-established association with many health and health-related outcomes in both the immediate perinatal period and across the entire life course. Optimizing fetal growth to improve both neonatal survival and population health is the focus of much research and policy development, although most efforts have concentrated on either the period of pregnancy itself or the period immediately preceding it. METHODS: Intergenerational data linked to the Aberdeen Children of the 1950s (ACONF) study were used to examine the influence of grandparental and parental life course biological and social variables on the distribution of offspring size at birth. Guided stepwise multivariable methods and a graphical approach were used to assess the relative importance of these temporally ordered and highly correlated life course measures. RESULTS: Both distal and proximal grandparental and parental life course biological and social factors predicted offspring size at birth. Inequalities in size at birth, according to adult maternal socioeconomic indicators, were found to be largely generated by the continuity of the social environment across generations, and the inequalities in maternal early life growth were predicted by the adult grandparental social environment during the mother's early life. Mother's own size at birth predicted her offspring's intrauterine growth, independent of her adult biological and social characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: A mother's childhood social environment and her early growth are both important predictors of her offspring's size at birth. Population strategies aimed at optimizing size at birth require broader social and intergenerational considerations, in addition to focusing on the health of mothers in the immediate pregnancy period.
BACKGROUND: Size at birth has taken on renewed significance due to its now well-established association with many health and health-related outcomes in both the immediate perinatal period and across the entire life course. Optimizing fetal growth to improve both neonatal survival and population health is the focus of much research and policy development, although most efforts have concentrated on either the period of pregnancy itself or the period immediately preceding it. METHODS: Intergenerational data linked to the Aberdeen Children of the 1950s (ACONF) study were used to examine the influence of grandparental and parental life course biological and social variables on the distribution of offspring size at birth. Guided stepwise multivariable methods and a graphical approach were used to assess the relative importance of these temporally ordered and highly correlated life course measures. RESULTS: Both distal and proximal grandparental and parental life course biological and social factors predicted offspring size at birth. Inequalities in size at birth, according to adult maternal socioeconomic indicators, were found to be largely generated by the continuity of the social environment across generations, and the inequalities in maternal early life growth were predicted by the adult grandparental social environment during the mother's early life. Mother's own size at birth predicted her offspring's intrauterine growth, independent of her adult biological and social characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: A mother's childhood social environment and her early growth are both important predictors of her offspring's size at birth. Population strategies aimed at optimizing size at birth require broader social and intergenerational considerations, in addition to focusing on the health of mothers in the immediate pregnancy period.
Authors: Alene Kennedy-Hendricks; Heather Schwartz; Rachel Johnson Thornton; Beth Ann Griffin; Harold D Green; David P Kennedy; Susan Burkhauser; Craig Evan Pollack Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Gregory E Miller; Jennifer Culhane; William Grobman; Hyagriv Simhan; Douglas E Williamson; Emma K Adam; Claudia Buss; Sonja Entringer; Kwang-Youn Kim; J Felipe Garcia-Espana; Lauren Keenan-Devlin; Thomas W McDade; Pathik D Wadhwa; Ann Borders Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Marius Lahti-Pulkkinen; Sohinee Bhattacharya; Katri Räikkönen; Clive Osmond; Jane E Norman; Rebecca M Reynolds Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Denise P Gigante; Bernardo L Horta; Alicia Matijasevich; Christian Loret de Mola; Aluisio J D Barros; Ina S Santos; Fernando C Barros; Cesar G Victora Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Carrie V Breton; Remy Landon; Linda G Kahn; Michelle Bosquet Enlow; Alicia K Peterson; Theresa Bastain; Joseph Braun; Sarah S Comstock; Cristiane S Duarte; Alison Hipwell; Hong Ji; Janine M LaSalle; Rachel L Miller; Rashelle Musci; Jonathan Posner; Rebecca Schmidt; Shakira F Suglia; Irene Tung; Daniel Weisenberger; Yeyi Zhu; Rebecca Fry Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2021-06-22