BACKGROUND: In the REPAIR-AMI trial, intracoronary infusion of bone marrow-derived cells (BMCs) was associated with a significantly greater recovery of contractile function in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at 4-month follow-up than placebo infusion. The current analysis investigates clinical outcome and predictors of event-free survival at 5 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind REPAIR-AMI trial, 204 patients receivedintracoronary infusion of BMCs (n = 101) or placebo (n = 103) into the infarct vessel 3-7 days following successful percutaneous coronary intervention. Fifteen patients died in the placebo group compared with seven patients in the BMC group (P = 0.08). Nine placebo-treated patients and five BMC-treated patients required rehospitalization for chronic heart failure (P = 0.23). The combined endpoint cardiac/cardiovascular/unknown death or rehospitalisation for heart failure was more frequent in the placebo compared with the BMC group (18 vs. 10 events; P = 0.10). Univariate predictors of adverse outcomes were age, the CADILLAC risk score, aldosterone antagonist and diuretic treatment, changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-systolic volume, and N-terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (all P < 0.01) at 4 months in the entire cohort and in the placebo group. In contrast, in the BMC group, only the basal (P = 0.02) and the stromal cell-derived factor-1-induced (P = 0.05) migratory capacity of the administered BMC were associated with improved clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: In patients of the REPAIR-AMI trial, established clinical parameters are associated with adverse outcome at 5 years exclusively in the placebo group, whereas the migratory capacity of the administered BMC determines event-free survival in the BMC-treated patients. These data disclose a potency-effect relationship between cell therapy and long-term outcome in patients with AMI. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In the REPAIR-AMI trial, intracoronary infusion of bone marrow-derived cells (BMCs) was associated with a significantly greater recovery of contractile function in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at 4-month follow-up than placebo infusion. The current analysis investigates clinical outcome and predictors of event-free survival at 5 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind REPAIR-AMI trial, 204 patients received intracoronary infusion of BMCs (n = 101) or placebo (n = 103) into the infarct vessel 3-7 days following successful percutaneous coronary intervention. Fifteen patients died in the placebo group compared with seven patients in the BMC group (P = 0.08). Nine placebo-treated patients and five BMC-treated patients required rehospitalization for chronic heart failure (P = 0.23). The combined endpoint cardiac/cardiovascular/unknown death or rehospitalisation for heart failure was more frequent in the placebo compared with the BMC group (18 vs. 10 events; P = 0.10). Univariate predictors of adverse outcomes were age, the CADILLAC risk score, aldosterone antagonist and diuretic treatment, changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-systolic volume, and N-terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (all P < 0.01) at 4 months in the entire cohort and in the placebo group. In contrast, in the BMC group, only the basal (P = 0.02) and the stromal cell-derived factor-1-induced (P = 0.05) migratory capacity of the administered BMC were associated with improved clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: In patients of the REPAIR-AMI trial, established clinical parameters are associated with adverse outcome at 5 years exclusively in the placebo group, whereas the migratory capacity of the administered BMC determines event-free survival in the BMC-treated patients. These data disclose a potency-effect relationship between cell therapy and long-term outcome in patients with AMI. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Patrick Celis; Nicolas Ferry; Marit Hystad; Martina Schüßler-Lenz; Pieter A Doevendans; Egbert Flory; Claire Beuneu; Ilona Reischl; Paula Salmikangas Journal: Transfus Med Hemother Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 3.747
Authors: Suzanna J Logan; Liya Yin; Werner J Geldenhuys; Molly K Enrick; Kelly M Stevanov; Richard T Carroll; Vahagn A Ohanyan; Christopher L Kolz; William M Chilian Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2015-03-01 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Florian H Seeger; Tina Rasper; Halvard Bönig; Birgit Assmus; Andreas M Zeiher; Stefanie Dimmeler Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2014-09-13 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Chi Y Lo; Brian R Weil; Beth A Palka; Arezoo Momeni; John M Canty; Sriram Neelamegham Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Christoph Edlinger; Catharina Schreiber; Bernhard Wernly; Alexandra Anker; Katja Ruzicka; Christian Jung; Uta C Hoppe; Michael Lichtenauer Journal: Stem Cell Rev Rep Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 5.739
Authors: Andreas Daiber; Sebastian Steven; Alina Weber; Vladimir V Shuvaev; Vladimir R Muzykantov; Ismail Laher; Huige Li; Santiago Lamas; Thomas Münzel Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 8.739