Literature DB >> 24568980

Evaluation of an indirect ophthalmoscopy digital photographic system as a retinopathy of prematurity screening tool.

Sasapin G Prakalapakorn1, Sharon F Freedman2, David K Wallace2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether digital retinal images obtained from an indirect ophthalmoscopy imaging system (Keeler) can be accurately graded for clinically significant retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) by masked experts.
METHODS: The medical records of infants screened for ROP who had posterior pole images acquired using the Keeler system during routine ROP examinations were retrospectively reviewed. Two reviewers, masked to patient demographics and clinical examination findings, graded the images for: (1) quality (good, fair, poor); (2) number of gradable quadrants, from 0 to 4; and (3) posterior pole disease (none, pre-plus, plus). The accuracy of grading Keeler images for clinically significant ROP (defined as pre-plus or plus disease) was compared to results of clinical examination.
RESULTS: One eye each of 253 infants was included. The mean postmenstrual age at examination was 35 weeks (range, 30-42). Grader 1 found the quality of 94% of images to be fair or good; grader 2, 83% of images. Grader 1 judged 87% of images to have ≥3 gradable quadrants; grader 2, 77% of images. The sensitivity and specificity of grading pre-plus or worse disease on Keeler images were 100% and 86%, respectively, for grader 1, and 94% and 89%, respectively, for grader 2.
CONCLUSIONS: Digital retinal images obtained by the Keeler system can be read with high sensitivity and specificity to screen for clinically important ROP. The Keeler system may be a valuable tool for ROP screening at remote locations (ie, via telemedicine).
Copyright © 2014 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24568980      PMCID: PMC3971732          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  19 in total

Review 1.  The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity revisited.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07

2.  Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Standard image of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Antonio Capone; Anna L Ells; Alistair R Fielder; John T Flynn; Glen A Gole; William V Good; Jonathan M Holmes; Gerd Holmstrom; Ximena Katz; J Arch McNamara; Earl A Palmer; Graham E Quinn; Michael Shapiro; Michael G J Trese; David K Wallace
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11

4.  Telemedical retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis: accuracy, reliability, and image quality.

Authors:  Michael F Chiang; Lu Wang; Mihai Busuioc; Yunling E Du; Patrick Chan; Steven A Kane; Thomas C Lee; David J Weissgold; Audina M Berrocal; Osode Coki; John T Flynn; Justin Starren
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11

5.  Interexpert agreement of plus disease diagnosis in retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Michael F Chiang; Lei Jiang; Rony Gelman; Yunling E Du; John T Flynn
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07

6.  Telemedicine screening for retinopathy of prematurity in developing countries using digital retinal images: a feasibility project.

Authors:  Alison H Skalet; Graham E Quinn; Gui-Shuang Ying; Luz Gordillo; Luz Dodobara; Ken Cocker; Alistair R Fielder; Anna L Ells; Monte D Mills; Clare Wilson; Clare Gilbert
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 1.220

7.  Multicenter trial of cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity. Preliminary results. Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-04

8.  Neonatologists' practices and experiences in arranging retinopathy of prematurity screening services.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; David K Wallace
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Revised indications for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: results of the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomized trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12

Review 10.  Retinopathy of prematurity: a global perspective of the epidemics, population of babies at risk and implications for control.

Authors:  Clare Gilbert
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of the accuracy of grading indirect ophthalmoscopy video images for retinopathy of prematurity screening.

Authors:  Sasapin G Prakalapakorn; David K Wallace; Riana S Dolland; Sharon F Freedman
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 1.402

2.  Facilitated Versus Self-guided Training of Non-ophthalmologists for Grading Pre-plus and Plus Disease Using Fundus Images for Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening.

Authors:  Nikolas N Raufi; Caleb K Morris; Sharon F Freedman; David K Wallace; S Grace Prakalapakorn
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 1.402

3.  Intereye Agreement of Retinopathy of Prematurity from Image Evaluation in the Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating of Acute-Phase ROP (e-ROP) Study.

Authors:  Gui-Shuang Ying; Wei Pan; Graham E Quinn; Ebenezer Daniel; Michael X Repka; Agnieshka Baumritter
Journal:  Ophthalmol Retina       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

4.  Posterior Pole Vascular Changes Before Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity.

Authors:  S Grace Prakalapakorn; David K Wallace; Sharon F Freedman
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 7.389

5.  Using video indirect ophthalmoscopy to demonstrate retinopathy of prematurity findings.

Authors:  Sasapin G Prakalapakorn; David K Wallace; Sharon F Freedman
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Real-time, computer-assisted quantification of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity at the bedside.

Authors:  Michelle T Cabrera; Sharon F Freedman; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Sandra S Stinnett; Bei Bei Chen; David K Wallace
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.300

7.  Retinal imaging in premature infants using the Pictor noncontact digital camera.

Authors:  Sasapin G Prakalapakorn; David K Wallace; Sharon F Freedman
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.220

8.  ROPtool analysis of plus and pre-plus disease in narrow-field images: a multi-image quadrant-level approach.

Authors:  Marguerite C Weinert; David K Wallace; Sharon F Freedman; J Wayne Riggins; Keith J Gallaher; S Grace Prakalapakorn
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 1.220

9.  A mobile team for screening of retinopathy of prematurity in India: Cost - effectiveness, outcomes, and impact assessment.

Authors:  Jai Kelkar; Aditya Kelkar; Shubhangi Sharma; Jaya Dewani
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

10.  Mobile unit for retinopathy of prematurity screening and management at urban Neonatal Intensive Care Units: Outcomes and impact assessment.

Authors:  Jai Kelkar; Supriya Agashe; Aditya Kelkar; Rajiv Khandekar
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Jan-Apr
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.