OBJECTIVE: In-time diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumonia) can play a significant role in decreasing morbidity and mortality rate. Applying molecular methods has gained popularity due to the existing limits of routine diagnostic methods. Examining the expression of different genes of this bacterium through different molecular methods suggests that lytA gene has a higher sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae. The aim of this study was to evalutate lytA gene expression in diagnosis of invasive S. pneumonia in culture positive specimens by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: IIn this a descriptive study, All received specimens were isolated to identify S. pneumoniae. DNA was then extracted and after optimizing the test and determining the detection limit, samples were tested by real-time PCR using lytA gene primers. RESULTS: Twenty seven isolates were diagnosed as S. pneumoniae. In all, the extracted DNA was positive in real-time method. The electrophoresis of the products also confirmed the presence of single product b along with the 53 base pair fragment. The detection limit of the test was less 6 colony forming unit (CFU). CONCLUSION: Real-Time PCR seems to provide reliable and rapid results. We suggest that this test should be conducted on the preliminary isolated specimens, since applying various biochemical tests need one extra working day.
OBJECTIVE: In-time diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumonia) can play a significant role in decreasing morbidity and mortality rate. Applying molecular methods has gained popularity due to the existing limits of routine diagnostic methods. Examining the expression of different genes of this bacterium through different molecular methods suggests that lytA gene has a higher sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae. The aim of this study was to evalutate lytA gene expression in diagnosis of invasive S. pneumonia in culture positive specimens by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: IIn this a descriptive study, All received specimens were isolated to identify S. pneumoniae. DNA was then extracted and after optimizing the test and determining the detection limit, samples were tested by real-time PCR using lytA gene primers. RESULTS: Twenty seven isolates were diagnosed as S. pneumoniae. In all, the extracted DNA was positive in real-time method. The electrophoresis of the products also confirmed the presence of single product b along with the 53 base pair fragment. The detection limit of the test was less 6 colony forming unit (CFU). CONCLUSION: Real-Time PCR seems to provide reliable and rapid results. We suggest that this test should be conducted on the preliminary isolated specimens, since applying various biochemical tests need one extra working day.
Entities:
Keywords:
Real Time PCR; Streptococcus pneumoniae; lytA Gene
The World Health Organization reports pneumococcal
infections as the reason of 1.6 million
deaths a year that over of one million of these
are children under five (1, 2). For the ten countries
with the greatest number of pneumococcalmeningitis cases, the greatest estimate variability
ranges from the jackknife analysis in Mexico
and Brazil (reduction of 61 and 39%, respectively)
to India, Nigeria, Pakistan, Bangladesh,
Ethiopia, and Congo, where the biggest changes
in case estimates were increased by 17-20% (3,
4).In some neighboring countries meningitis
death toll due to Streptococcus pneumoniae
compared to other meningitis-causing bacteria
has been reported as following: United Arab
Emirates at 15.6%, Kuwait at 44%, Saudi Arabia
at 35%, Iraq at 18.8% and Turkey at 29.7%
(5-9).Besides routine isolation in culture media, there are many different methods for detecting
S. pneumoniae including latex agglutination,
counter immunoelectrophoresis, and immunochromatography.
The latex agglutination
method which is used widely in comparison
with other rapid methods has acceptable results
(86% sensitivity) with fairly high sensitivity for
Cerebral Spinal Fluid (CSF). Recently, various
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) -based techniques
are used to diagnose pneumococcus, the
most important of which is real-time PCR (10-
12).Three most applied pneumococcal genes
are lytA, ply, and psaA that encode autolysin,
Pneumolysin and surface adhesion A respectively,
among all pneumococcal genes used in
PCR (13, 14). The specificity levels for lytA,
psaA and ply have been evaluated and reported
at 100, 98 and 81% respectively (10).
Some other genes such as pbp1a and pbp2x
present in β-lactam -resistant Streptococcus
and cpbA genes and wzy responsible for capsular
genes can be also named (8, 13, 15). The
box and cpsA genes are used as housekeeping
genes.The aim of this study was to set up a PCR protocol
and to evaluate the lytA gene in those isolated
invasive S. pneumoniae by the real-time
PCR method on the collected specimens from
Tehran and Isfahan provinces.
Materials and Methods
The study population
This was a descriptive study performed on
isolated S. pneumonia from suspected patients.
Overall, 27 samples were collected from pneumonia
suspects and pneumococcus meningitispatients at Milad, Bahrami and Shariati Hospitals
in Tehran and Alzahra, Amin and Mahdyieh
Hospitals in Isfahan.
Specimens and isolation
Received specimens were CSF, had eye discharge,
pleural fluid and trachea aspirates. The
mentioned samples were cultured on blood agar.
Suspected colonies were identified by hemolysis
pattern, sensitivity to optochin and bile solubility.
All isolates were cultured in trypticase
soy broth (TSB) media to preserve them which
contained 10% glycerol and were maintained in
the temperature of -70˚C (16).
DNA erxtraction
DNA was extracted using the column based
method from all the microbial suspensions by
the DNA extraction kit (MiniPrep, QIAGEN
GmbH, Germany).
The quality control of the extracted samples
The optical density of all the extracted specimens
were measured at the wavelengths of 260
and 280 nm and the ratio of 260 to 280 was determined
for all extracted genomes.
Real-time PCR
Primer pair and the probe were used from
that reported by Carvalho et al. (10). Applied
concentration of the PCR materials and amplification
program were optimized (Tables1, 2).
PCR was run by two real-time machines: Rotor
gene 6000 (Corbett Research, Australia) and
StepOne (Applied Biosystems, USA).
Table 1
Temperature program for real-time PCR
PCR Step
Temperature
Time
Cycle No.
Initial Denaturing
95°C
10 minutes
1 X
Denaturing
95°C
15 seconds
Annealing + Extension
60°C
60 seconds
40 X
Table 2
Real-time PCR mix content
Concentration
Volume
Forward primer
10 pmol
0.5 µl
Reverse primer
10 pmol
0.5 µl
Probe
10 pmol
0.5 µl
MgCl2
25 mM
1.5 µl
dNTP Mix
10 mM
0.5 µl
10x Buffer
10x
2.5 µl
Taq polymerase
5 U/µl
0.2 µl
DNA
10 µg/ml
2.0 µl
D.D.W
60˚C
17.0 µl
Temperature program for real-time PCRReal-time PCR mix content
Assessment of the detection limit
Serial 10-fold dilutions of pneumococcal
reference strain ATCC 33400 serotype 5 were
prepared. A serial 10 fold dilution was prepared
and three drop of each dilution was put on blood
agar medium. The lowest dilution that had the
countable growing colony was detected and the
number of the organisms was estimated in the
starting ones. Each dilution was extracted and
used in PCR as well.
Electrophoresis
To ensure result accuracy, the PCR products
were analyzed on 1% agarose gel with 100 base
pair ladder. The specific band was observed after
electrophoresis and staining with ethidium bromide.
Results
Detection limit of the test
The number of S. pneumoniae was estimated
to be 5.6×106 CFU in starting sample dilution.
Real-time PCR was performed in each prepared
tenfold dilution. Each dilution was extracted
separately and was finally eluted in 50 μl of
which 5 μl was used for the test. The extracted
genome was tested by the real-time PCR protocols.
The final sensitivity was detected to be 5.6
CFU (Fig 1).
Fig 1
Serial dilution of positive sample’s graphs. The
dilution 1, 1/10, 1/100, 1/1000, and 1/10000 are represent
for 5.6×105, 5.6×104, 5.6×103, 5.6×102 and 5.6 CFU
respectively.
Serial dilution of positive sample’s graphs. The
dilution 1, 1/10, 1/100, 1/1000, and 1/10000 are represent
for 5.6×105, 5.6×104, 5.6×103, 5.6×102 and 5.6 CFU
respectively.
Specificity
Some non-pneumococcal bacteria causing
respiratory tract infection (H. influenzae and
N. meningitides) were used for the specificity
test of the protocols as well as the noninvasive
S. pneumoniae. The result of PCR was negative
for all tested isolates. Besides, the BLAST
search (NCBI) also revealed 100% specificity
for a wide range of sequenced pneumococcal
genomes.
Sensitivity
All the collected specimens were identified
as S. pneumoniae after rechecking by biochemical
tests. All extracted specimens had an
acceptable purity, since the ratio of measured
optical density at 260 nm to 280 nm were between
1.8 and 2. All these isolates had positive
signal in real-time PCR indicating 100
percent sensitivity. Their Ct was in the range
of 16.1 and 20.3 (Fig 2). Also, a product band
was observed in all tested specimens after
electrophoresis (Fig 3).
Fig 2
Real-time PCR graphs for samples.
Fig 3
Electrophoresis of the PCR product.
Real-time PCR graphs for samples.Electrophoresis of the PCR product.
Discussion
Different S. pneumoniae genes have been
used in different studies to detect this pathogen.
The study where different genes (erm,
mef, pbp2b and pbp1a) were analyzed and
compared with each other was conducted by
Nagai et al. (15). The PCR protocol proved
presence of lytA gene in all tested specimens
(16). In another study by Messmer et al. (17),
psaA and lytA genes and two different sequence
fragments of ply gene were analyzed
and compared. The results of the ply gene
were not satisfactory. From the 16 atypical
streptococci samples, 8 from the first primer
set and all the 16 from the second primer
set were reported positive. The psaA gene
showed difference only in one case but the
lytA gene was detected in all the isolates.Carvalho et al. (10) applied specific primers
for lytA, ply and psaA genes. The results were
compared for 67 S. pneumoniae isolated from
44 different serotypes and 3 non-capsule samples
together with 104 non-pneumococcus
isolates. All the 67 S. pneumoniae samples
were positive for all the three genes which
prove their appropriate sensitivity, although
ply gene was positive in all non-capsule samples
proving its lower specificity.Analysis of results revealed specimens
were positive in all isolates form both Tehran
and Isfahan by this PCR protocol indicating
100% sensitivity. We used extracted genome
of isolated organisms. It will be more important
to apply the PCR directly on extracted
genome of unknown specimens rather than
isolated organisms, since it is required to access
the results in the shortest possible time
in some patients with critical conditions. We
have to isolate and identify the organisms in
received specimens in this study. We suggest
to set up another project with its own fund to
achieve directly tested specimens. Therefore,
it is necessary to consider a second protocol
as an internal control to ensure identification
of true negative results in some specimens
and distinguish them from false negative results.It is shown that all pneumococcal specific
type strains have 100 percent specificity
based on BLAST search and other specificity
tests. All extracted genomes had also similar
positive signal when tested with real-time
PCR. Although all our tested strains in this
study have been isolated from various hospitals
in Tehran and Isfahan, it is necessary to
evaluate the sensitivity of this protocol with
all known serotypes.Real-time PCR has also being compared
with the multiplex PCR format. Azzari et al.
(12) applied 67 specimens for this comparison
and reported higher sensitivity for realtime
PCR (12).
Conclusion
The molecular examination of lytA gene,
due to its high sensitivity and specificity, is
the best and most practical method to correctly
diagnose invasive S. pneumoniae from
clinical samples and isolates. However, the
results must be confirmed in directly test
specimens as well.
Authors: Barry B Mook-Kanamori; Madelijn Geldhoff; Tom van der Poll; Diederik van de Beek Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Odile B Harrison; Angela B Brueggemann; Dominique A Caugant; Arie van der Ende; Matthias Frosch; Stephen Gray; Sigrid Heuberger; Paula Krizova; Per Olcen; Mary Slack; Muhamed-Kheir Taha; Martin C J Maiden Journal: Microbiology (Reading) Date: 2011-05-26 Impact factor: 2.777
Authors: Chiara Azzari; Maria Moriondo; Giuseppe Indolfi; Martina Cortimiglia; Clementina Canessa; Laura Becciolini; Francesca Lippi; Maurizio de Martino; Massimo Resti Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Maria da Gloria S Carvalho; Maria Lucia Tondella; Karen McCaustland; Luciana Weidlich; Lesley McGee; Leonard W Mayer; Arnold Steigerwalt; Melissa Whaley; Richard R Facklam; Barry Fields; George Carlone; Edwin W Ades; Ron Dagan; Jacquelyn S Sampson Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2007-05-30 Impact factor: 5.948