| Literature DB >> 24567746 |
Beata Ujvari1, Anne-Maree Pearse2, Kate Swift2, Pamela Hodson2, Bobby Hua2, Stephen Pyecroft3, Robyn Taylor2, Rodrigo Hamede4, Menna Jones4, Katherine Belov1, Thomas Madsen5.
Abstract
The Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumour Disease (DFTD) provides a unique opportunity to elucidate the long-term effects of natural and anthropogenic selection on cancer evolution. Since first observed in 1996, this transmissible cancer has caused local population declines by >90%. So far, four chromosomal DFTD variants (strains) have been described and karyotypic analyses of 253 tumours showed higher levels of tetraploidy in the oldest strain. We propose that increased ploidy in the oldest strain may have evolved in response to effects of genomic decay observed in asexually reproducing organisms. In this study, we focus on the evolutionary response of DFTD to a disease suppression trial. Tumours collected from devils subjected to the removal programme showed accelerated temporal evolution of tetraploidy compared with tumours from other populations where no increase in tetraploid tumours were observed. As ploidy significantly reduces tumour growth rate, we suggest that the disease suppression trial resulted in selection favouring slower growing tumours mediated by an increased level of tetraploidy. Our study reveals that DFTD has the capacity to rapidly respond to novel selective regimes and that disease eradication may result in novel tumour adaptations, which may further imperil the long-term survival of the world's largest carnivorous marsupial.Entities:
Keywords: Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumour Disease; cancer evolution; genomic decay; tetraploidy
Year: 2013 PMID: 24567746 PMCID: PMC3927887 DOI: 10.1111/eva.12117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evol Appl ISSN: 1752-4571 Impact factor: 5.183
Figure 1Map of Tasmania showing the location of the 11 sites sampled and number of samples collected at each location.
Figure 2Proportion of tetraploid tumours recorded in the four DFTD strains. The numbers above the bars depict samples sizes. The two bars at strain 3 depict the proportion of tetraploid tumours when including (n = 154) and excluding (n = 7) the samples collected at Forestier Peninsula.
Figure 3Logistic regression analyses of temporal variation in tetraploid tumours. Figure (A) Depicts the variation from 2006 to 2011 using our complete data set, that is, the analysis is based on all the 11 populations. Figure (B) Depicts the temporal variation in tetraploid tumours excluding the samples collected at Forestier Peninsula. Figure (C) Depicts the temporal variation in tetraploid tumours collected at the Forestier Peninsula.