| Literature DB >> 24567677 |
In-Hee Ko1, Jung-Hee Kim1, Byoung-Hee Lee1.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of the study was to provide information for intervention by comparing lower limb muscle thickness, gross motor function and functional level of activity daily living between cerebral palsy (CP) and mental retardation (MR). [Subjects] Sixty subjects participated: 38 CP and 9 MR subjects and 13 normally developing infants. [Methods] Ultrasonography and a manual muscle tester were used for measuring the thickness and strength of knee extensor and ankle plantar flexor muscles. The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) and Wee Functional Independence Measure (WeeFIM) were used to evaluate level of gross motor and independence level.Entities:
Keywords: Cerebral palsy; Mental retardation; Muscle thickness
Year: 2014 PMID: 24567677 PMCID: PMC3927043 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.26.63
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
General characteristics of the participants
| Normal development infant (n=13) | Cerebral palsy (n=38) | Mental retardation (n=9) | |
| Sex (male/female) | 8/5 | 21/17 | 4/5 |
| Age (month) | 79.6 (24.0) a | 66.6 (15.7) | 53.8 (17.9) |
| Height (cm) | 120.3 (16.7) | 107.6 (6.6) | 102.4 (9.2) |
| Weight (kg) | 21.3 (5.6) | 18.3 (3.2) | 16.6 (3.0) |
Values are a mean (SD).
Comparison of muscle thickness and strengths among the groups
| NDI (n=13) | CP (n=38) | MR (n=9) | ||
| Muscle thickness (mm) | RF in standing | 12.69 (1.97) *, a | 11.89 (2.05) b | 10.14 (2.51) |
| RF lying | 16.13 (3.07)*, a | 14.55 (2.33) b | 12.63 (1.85) | |
| Gastrocnemius standing | 11.46 (1.55) | 11.90 (2.57) | 12.55 (3.06) | |
| Gastrocnemius lying | 15.41 (2.42) | 14.72 (3.68) | 14.34 (3.78) | |
| Muscle strength (kg) | Knee extensor | 17.77 (5.45) *, c | 7.92 (4.82) | 11.19 (5.85) d |
| Plantar flexor | 15.54 (7.51) *, c | 6.01 (4.11) | 7.82 (3.04) d | |
Values are mean (SD). NDI: normally developing infants; CP: cerebral palsy; MR: mental retardation; RF: rectus femoris; *p<0.05 from mean among the three groups; a, NDI is significantly greater than CP and MR; b, CP is significantly greater than MR; c, NDI is significantly stronger than CP and MR; d, MR is significantly stronger than CP according to the post hoc test.
Comparison of GMFM and WeeFIM between CP and MR
| CP (n=38) | MR (n=9) | ||
| GMFM (score) | Lying & Rolling | 97.76 (8.42) | 100.00 (0.00) |
| Sitting | 95.00 (10.00) | 97.78 (3.93) | |
| Crawling & Kneeling | 80.42 (18.49) | 84.11 (24.01) | |
| Standing | 53.95 (30.76) | 68.89 (34.03) | |
| Walking, Running & Jumping | 39.47 (33.32) | 60.56 (39.22) | |
| total | 73.34 (17.71) | 82.33 (19.95) | |
| WeeFIM (score) | Self-care | 27.21 (11.89) | 28.00 (11.63) |
| Bladder & Bowel control | 12.05 (3.67) | 12.33 (3.04) | |
| Ambulation | 12.95 (6.81) | 15.33 (6.44) | |
| Place transfer | 8.18 (4.69) | 9.11 (5.48) | |
| Conversation | 11.16 (3.82) | 8.89 (3.51) | |
| Social cognition | 16.68 (6.01)* | 11.56 (5.10) | |
| total | 88.24 (31.39) | 85.22 (21.73) | |
Values are mean (SD). *p<0.05 from mean between the two groups