Bong-Jun Kong1, Jong-Soo Lim1, Kyung Kim1. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, Daegu University Graduate School of Physical Therapy, Daegu University, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study investigated the relationship between herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) and fat infiltration of muscles around the spine by measuring body mass index (BMI) and fat infiltration of the muscles around the spine. [Subjects and Methods] Subjects were 82 people, both men and women they were divided into two groups, a normal group and a patient group who were suffering from serious HNP between L4 and L5. Of the anthropometric measurement, and fat infiltration muscles by measuring the cross-sectional area from the center of the disc to the muscle around the spine and the cross-sectional area of fat infiltration. [Results] Fat infiltration rate of each lumbar layer in the normal group was different L34-L45 and L45-L5S1, but not between L23-L34. Fat infiltration in the muscle between the normal group and patients with HNP was different in the layers and the difference was greatest in the L5-S1 layer. [Conclusion] We performed correlation analysis of BMI and the total fat infiltration rate in each group to find the relationship between obesity and fat infiltration in the lumbar spine. Fat infiltration increased, and normal people or patients with chronic back pain are considered to be exposed to other diseases as fat infiltration in the lumbar spine increases.
[Purpose] This study investigated the relationship between herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) and fat infiltration of muscles around the spine by measuring body mass index (BMI) and fat infiltration of the muscles around the spine. [Subjects and Methods] Subjects were 82 people, both men and women they were divided into two groups, a normal group and a patient group who were suffering from serious HNP between L4 and L5. Of the anthropometric measurement, and fat infiltration muscles by measuring the cross-sectional area from the center of the disc to the muscle around the spine and the cross-sectional area of fat infiltration. [Results]Fat infiltration rate of each lumbar layer in the normal group was different L34-L45 and L45-L5S1, but not between L23-L34. Fat infiltration in the muscle between the normal group and patients with HNP was different in the layers and the difference was greatest in the L5-S1 layer. [Conclusion] We performed correlation analysis of BMI and the total fat infiltration rate in each group to find the relationship between obesity and fat infiltration in the lumbar spine. Fat infiltration increased, and normal people or patients with chronic back pain are considered to be exposed to other diseases as fat infiltration in the lumbar spine increases.
Entities:
Keywords:
Fat infiltration; Herniated nucleus pulposus; Low back pain
In modern society, many people lack of physical exercise, which results in high risk of
back pain. As back pain occurs a lot in the working age group, it has become a public health
issue because of its effect on the labor force1, 2).Herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) is a typical functional spine disease which occurs when
nucleus pulposus is exposed by annular tear3). It occurs due to natural aging, genetic effects, obesity, lack of
exercise, bad posture, medical history, excessive work, weight overload in daily activities
etc4). In most cases, patients complain
of radiating pain with back pain5).
Biomarkers which measure changes in the muscle around the spine caused by back pain are fat
content in cross-sectional area of muscle, muscular strength, efficiency etc6). Among them, fat infiltration of the lumbar
multifidus muscle has a strong relationship accompanying with back pain in adults7).Studies of patients with chronic back pain8) and HNP9) have
revealed types, dispersion and arrangement changes of muscle fiber, and decrease in muscle
size. Some radiological image studies10,11,12)
have examined the relationship between muscle size and fat infiltration with back pain.
Though the studies cited above focused on the correlation between back pain and muscle
morphological changes, it is necessary to confirm the definitions used in muscle
observation. Most studies of the fat infiltration of muscles around the spine have been
limited to the examination of the cross-section of muscles around the spine between lumbar
levels 4 and 5. It is necessary to know if there is a significant difference of fat
infiltration between patients with HNP and a control group (normal people) and the
characteristics of any differences. The purpose of this study was to find the differences in
fat infiltration of the muscles around each lumbar vertebra between healthy subjects and
patients diagnosed with HNP between lumbar levels 4 and 5.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Subjects
The subjects were selected from among the patients who visited K hospital in Ku-mi,
Korea, from Aug. 2010 to May 2012, because of back pain. We used preoperative radiologic
images of the patients who had microdisectomy (MIMD) after diagnosis of with HNP between
lumbar levels 4 and 5. We excluded patients who had tumor, inflammation, metabolic
disorder or musculoskeletal disease caused by structural spine anomalies. The subjects
performed exercises using the muscles around the lumbar spine before proceeding with
imaging. All of the subject understood the purpose of this study and gave their written
informed consent to participation before experimental involvement. The study was performed
following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and ethical approval was granted
by the local committee of the Institutional Review Board. The subjects were men and women
between the ages of 21 and 65, and their physical characteristics are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
General characteristics of the subjects (Mean±SD)
Normal (n=42)
HNP (n=40)
sex (male/female)
28/14
20/20
height (cm)
169.3±6.9
167.5±8.6
age (yrs)
42.2±10.9
41.9±7.9
weight (kg)
65.8±9.6
66.3±12.6
BMI (kg/m2)
22.8±2.0
23.4±2.7
Methods
After MRI-scanning of the lumbar region, we measured the cross-sectional area of the
erector spinae and multifidus muscles and their fat infiltration areas using Free Line ROI
(region of interest) in the PACS menu on the Axial view of the T2 screen. The measurements
were automatically computerized by PACS and appeared on the screen as shown in Fig. 1. To ensure the objectivity of the measurement, each measurer checked the
measurement twice, and we adopted the mean value. Subjects’ weight and height were
measured after fasting, while they were wearing light clothing, and we calculated the body
mass index (BMI) by dividing the weight (kg) with the square of height (m).
Fig. 1.
Cross section of fat from PACS
Cross section of fat from PACSStatistical analysis was performed using SPSS ver. 18.0. The general characteristics of
the subjects are presented as the mean±SD of each group. (1) The significance of the
dispersion of fat infiltration at each level of the lumbar spine was examined using the
paired t-test at each inter-vertebral level of the lumbar spine in each group. To compare
the increase of fat infiltration rate between patients with HNP and the normal group
subjects, we performed the independent t-test, and to find the correlation of obesity with
fat infiltration in the lumbar region we conducted correlation analysis of total fat
infiltration rate and BMI for each group.
RESULTS
The fat infiltration rate of each lumbar layer in the normal group was different between
L34–L45 and L45–L5S1, but not between L23–L34, and the patients with HNP had different fat
infiltration rates at all levels (Table
2).
Table 2.
Results of the between level comparisons (Mean±SD)
Lumbar level
Fat infiltration
Normal group
L23–L34
−0.26±1.98
L34–L45
−1.37±2.82*
L45–L5S1
−2.43±3.03**
HNP group
L23–L34
−2.21±3.24**
L34–L45
−3.55±3.35**
L45–L5S1
−4.62±6.37**
* p<0.05, ** p<0.001, paired t-test (Unit: mm2)
* p<0.05, ** p<0.001, paired t-test (Unit: mm2)Fat infiltration of the muscle between the normal group and patients with HNP was different
at all the layers, and the difference was greatest at the L5–S1 layer (Table 3).
* p<0.05, ** p<0.001, independent t-test (Unit: mm2)According to the paired t-test, there were significant differences between the normal group
and the HNP group. When comparing infiltration rates at each level of the lumbar spine, we
found the mean value of fat infiltration increased in the lower part of the lumbar spine.
According to the independent t-test, there were significant differences in fat infiltration
rate between the normal group and the HNP group.
DISCUSSION
The multifidus muscle is a stabilizer muscle which is important for maintaining the neutral
posture of the lumbar spine13). The
multifidus muscle is posteriomedial and is distributed in two or four segments. It plays a
key role in stabilization of the spine, and shrinking of the multifidus muscle and segmental
dysfunction of the spine are a highly correlated with chronic back pain14, 15). Thus, the
purpose of this study was to examine the difference between a normal group of subjects and
patients with HNP by measuring fat infiltration rate of the multifidus in the lumbar,
region, as it has a high correlation with the stabilization of spine in the neutral position
and lumbar disc diseases.BMI is commonly used to determine obesity. It is calculated from weight and height and is
used around the world. BMI is universally used as an index of obesity. Changes in BMI
influence body shape, moving the center of gravity forward or backward, increasing the
mechanical load on the lumbar spine, changing the curvature of the lumbar spine or causing
back pain16). Fabris de Souza et al.
showed that the degree of forward bending increases when obesepeople sit or stand, and they
emphasized the load increase on the disc17). They examined the correlation between physical changes in the body
based on the BMI and back pain. We aimed to determine the correlation between BMI and fat
infiltration in the lumbar spine, and the difference in the fat infiltration of the muscles
around the lumbar spine between normal subjects and HNP patients. Prior studies reported
high prevalence of fat infiltration in patients15) and controls18),
and fat infiltration was more common in old people11). Kjaer7) found
that adults usually had fat infiltration of the multifidus around the lumbar spine.
Kader15) reported that 80% of patients
with back pain had weakness in the multifidus in an MRI study. Danneel14) also found a significant difference in the strength of the
multifidus between healthy people and patients with chronic back pain. Kamaz19) reported that there was a significant
weakness in the multifidus when the paraspinal muscle, lumbar quadrate muscle or major psoas
muscle showed various degrees of weakness. It is reported that patients with HNP had a
weakened multifidus after surgery20).In the comparison of fat infiltration between each lumbar level, the difference of fat
infiltration between each segmental level was significant (p<0.05) and the rate of
increase between L34 and L45 was the greatest. This is because HNP increases in higher
segmental levels, and the rate of increase is greater in the lower segmental levels. This
may the result of a decrease in movement because of lower back pain. This is in agreement
with the research results we cited above.Regarding fat infiltration of the muscles around the paraspinal muscle, patients with HNP
and the normal group subjects showed significant differences at all levels (p<0.05). The
difference was especially great at L23, L45 and L5S1. This agrees with the study results of
Danneels14). Fat infiltration of the
muscles of patients with HNP might be greater than that of the normal group subjects,
because pain and inflammation initiate the reflex-inhibition mechanism, limiting the
movement of flexor and extensor muscles18).When comparing fat infiltration rate between each layer of the HNP group with that of the
normal group, we found the greatest difference in L5S1. In general, flexion, extension,
lateral flextion etc. are more active in L45 and L5S121), and in order to activate these movements, paraspinal muscle tones
are widely dispersed around L522). Because
pain activates the spinal reflex inhibition system, the HNP group can’t move immediately at
L45. When such movements are accompanied by continuous pain, these movements would decrease
to protect the damaged tissue, and the fat infiltration rate would increases more in the
lower part, which would explain why the greatest difference was seen at L5S1.Among patients who received discectomy, Meredith23) found a significant difference between BMIs of relapsed patients
and normal patients, and the relapse rate of HNP among patients with +BMI 30 (considered
clinically obese) requiring reoperation was found to be highly correlated in multi-variate
crossover analysis. However, we didn’t find a correlation. This result agrees with the
research of Kjaer7). BMI appears to be
unrelated to fat infiltration of the multifidus. Fat infiltration would appear in all
muscles, but it only appeared a lot in L5. Besides, there is a limit to analyzing fat
between muscles and bones using BMI.Currently, it is hard to conclude that the fat infiltration of the paraspinal muscles is
the main cause in HNP, but we confirmed that fat infiltration increased, and normal subjects
or patients with chronic back pain are considered to be exposed to other diseases as fat
infiltration in lumbar spine increases. To prevent HNP, we need to stop fat infiltration and
try various therapies in order to slow the degenerative changes. Especially, we need to find
a direct method of order to decreasing the fat infiltration rate of the paraspinal
muscles.
Authors: Anne Keller; Jens I Brox; Ragnhild Gunderson; Inger Holm; Astrid Friis; Olav Reikerås Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Katie G W Bouche; Olivier Vanovermeire; Veerle K Stevens; Pascal L Coorevits; Jacques J Caemaert; Dirk C Cambier; Koenraad Verstraete; Guy G Vanderstraeten; Lieven A Danneels Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2011-03-31 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Neil Welch; Kieran Moran; Joseph Antony; Chris Richter; Brendan Marshall; Joe Coyle; Eanna Falvey; Andrew Franklyn-Miller Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2015-11-09
Authors: Obiajulu Agha; Andreas Mueller-Immergluck; Mengyao Liu; He Zhang; Alekos A Theologis; Aaron Clark; Hubert T Kim; Xuhui Liu; Brian T Feeley; Jeannie F Bailey Journal: JOR Spine Date: 2020-05-06
Authors: Jeffrey R Cooley; Bruce F Walker; Emad M Ardakani; Per Kjaer; Tue S Jensen; Jeffrey J Hebert Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 2.362