Literature DB >> 24567652

Factors associated with prevalence and types of 'may be fit' advice on fit notes: a cross-sectional primary care analysis.

Chris Shiels1, Mark Gabbay, Jim Hillage.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 'fit note', with the opportunity for the GP to advise that a patient 'may be fit' to do some work, was introduced in April 2010. AIM: To estimate numbers of fit notes with 'may be fit' advice, the types of advice, and factors associated with any inclusion of such advice in the fit note. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Cross-sectional analysis of fit note data from 68 general practices in eight regions of England, Wales and Scotland.
METHOD: Collection of practice fit note data via GP use of carbonised pads of fit notes for a period of 12 months.
RESULTS: The 'may be fit' box was ticked on 5080 fit notes (6.4% of all fit notes in study). But there was a wide variation in completion rates across the 68 practices (from 1% to 15%). The most prevalent individual item of advice was to 'amend duties' of patient as a prerequisite for return to work (included in 42% of all notes containing any 'may be fit' advice). Advice was often incomplete or irrelevant, with some GPs failing to comply with official guidance. Inclusion of any 'may be fit' advice was independently associated with the patient being female, less socially deprived and having a physical health reason for receiving a fit note.
CONCLUSION: Unlike other studies that have relied upon eliciting opinion, this study investigates how the fit note is being used in practice. Findings provide some evidence that the fit note is not yet being used to the optimum benefit of patients (and their employers).

Entities:  

Keywords:  general practice; return to work; sickness certification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24567652      PMCID: PMC3933837          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X677509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  7 in total

1.  Working towards a 'fit note': an experimental vignette survey of GPs.

Authors:  Anna Sallis; Richard Birkin; Fehmidah Munir
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Commentary: From sickness to fitness: modernising medical certification.

Authors:  Steven E Bradshaw
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Partial sick leave--review of its use, effects and feasibility in the Nordic countries.

Authors:  Johanna Kausto; Helena Miranda; Kari-Pekka Martimo; Eira Viikari-Juntura
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  Work-related ill health in general practice, as reported to a UK-wide surveillance scheme.

Authors:  Louise Hussey; Susan Turner; Kevan Thorley; Roseanne McNamee; Raymond Agius
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Identification of UK sickness certification rates, standardised for age and sex.

Authors:  Gwenllian Wynne-Jones; Christian D Mallen; Sara Mottram; Chris J Main; Kate M Dunn
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Patient factors associated with duration of certified sickness absence and transition to long-term incapacity.

Authors:  Chris Shiels; Mark B Gabbay; Fiona Mary Ford
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Patient, clinician, and general practice factors in long-term certified sickness.

Authors:  Christopher Shiels; Mark B Gabbay
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.021

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Fit for work? How GPs' decisions about fitness to work can improve health.

Authors:  Richard Byng; Hannah Wheat; Rebecca K Barnes
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Health condition at first fit note and number of fit notes: a longitudinal study of primary care records in south London.

Authors:  Sarah Dorrington; Ewan Carr; C Polling; Sharon Stevelink; Mark Ashworth; Emmert Roberts; Matthew Broadbent; Stephani Hatch; Ira Madan; Matthew Hotopf
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Access to mental healthcare in the year after first fit note: a longitudinal study of linked clinical records.

Authors:  Sarah Dorrington; Ewan Carr; Sharon Stevelink; Mark Ashworth; Matthew Broadbent; Ira Madan; Stephani Hatch; Matthew Hotopf
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Factors associated with sickness certification of injured workers by General Practitioners in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Rasa Ruseckaite; Alex Collie; Maatje Scheepers; Bianca Brijnath; Agnieszka Kosny; Danielle Mazza
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.