BACKGROUND: General practices in the UK receive incentive payments for managing patients with selected chronic conditions under the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) scheme. Payments are made when a negotiated threshold percentage of patients receive the appropriate intervention. AIM: From 2013-2014 in England the Department of Health has proposed that this negotiated threshold is replaced with a value equal to the 75th percentile of national performance to attract maximum payments. This is an investigation of the potential impact of this change on practice income and workload. DESIGN AND SETTING: Analysis of 2011-2012 QOF dataset (the latest available) which covers 8123 GP practices and 55.5 million patients in England. METHOD: The 75th percentile of performance was calculated for 52 clinical indicators and applied to 2011-2012 performance. Estimations were made of financial and workload impacts on practices, and whether practices with different characteristics would be disproportionately affected. RESULTS: The proposed changes will result in an increase in the upper payment threshold of each clinical indicator by a mean of 7.47% (range 2.16-38.87%). If performance remains static practices would lose a mean of 47.68 (0-108.33) QOF points, equivalent to a mean financial change of -£279.60 (-£35 352.50 to +£19 957.78) per practice for these 52 indicators. CONCLUSION: Increasing the QOF upper payment threshold to the 75th percentile of national performance will, if clinical performance remains static, substantially reduce the mean number of QOF points achieved per practice. However, this translates into only a small mean loss of income per practice.
BACKGROUND: General practices in the UK receive incentive payments for managing patients with selected chronic conditions under the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) scheme. Payments are made when a negotiated threshold percentage of patients receive the appropriate intervention. AIM: From 2013-2014 in England the Department of Health has proposed that this negotiated threshold is replaced with a value equal to the 75th percentile of national performance to attract maximum payments. This is an investigation of the potential impact of this change on practice income and workload. DESIGN AND SETTING: Analysis of 2011-2012 QOF dataset (the latest available) which covers 8123 GP practices and 55.5 million patients in England. METHOD: The 75th percentile of performance was calculated for 52 clinical indicators and applied to 2011-2012 performance. Estimations were made of financial and workload impacts on practices, and whether practices with different characteristics would be disproportionately affected. RESULTS: The proposed changes will result in an increase in the upper payment threshold of each clinical indicator by a mean of 7.47% (range 2.16-38.87%). If performance remains static practices would lose a mean of 47.68 (0-108.33) QOF points, equivalent to a mean financial change of -£279.60 (-£35 352.50 to +£19 957.78) per practice for these 52 indicators. CONCLUSION: Increasing the QOF upper payment threshold to the 75th percentile of national performance will, if clinical performance remains static, substantially reduce the mean number of QOF points achieved per practice. However, this translates into only a small mean loss of income per practice.
Entities:
Keywords:
QOF; general practice; incentive; outcomes; payment
Authors: Robert Fleetcroft; Sheetal Parekh-Bhurke; Amanda Howe; Richard Cookson; Louise Swift; Nicholas Steel Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Evangelos Kontopantelis; Tim Doran; Hugh Gravelle; Rosalind Goudie; Luigi Siciliani; Matt Sutton Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Helen Lester; Julie Schmittdiel; Joe Selby; Bruce Fireman; Stephen Campbell; Janelle Lee; Alan Whippy; Philip Madvig Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-05-11
Authors: Tim Doran; Catherine Fullwood; Hugh Gravelle; David Reeves; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Urara Hiroeh; Martin Roland Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-07-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tim Doran; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Jose M Valderas; Stephen Campbell; Martin Roland; Chris Salisbury; David Reeves Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-06-28
Authors: Evangelos Kontopantelis; David Reeves; Jose M Valderas; Stephen Campbell; Tim Doran Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2012-08-22 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Jane S Hocking; Anna Wood; Meredith Temple-Smith; Sabine Braat; Matthew Law; Liliana Bulfone; Callum Jones; Mieke van Driel; Christopher K Fairley; Basil Donovan; Rebecca Guy; Nicola Low; John Kaldor; Jane Gunn Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Jane S Hocking; Meredith Temple-Smith; Mieke van Driel; Matthew Law; Rebecca Guy; Liliana Bulfone; Anna Wood; Nicola Low; Basil Donovan; Christopher K Fairley; John Kaldor; Jane Gunn Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 7.327