BACKGROUND: The criteria used when GPs submit stool specimens for microbiological investigation are unknown. AIM: To determine what criteria GPs use to send stool specimens, and if they are consistent with national guidance, and whether GPs would prescribe an antibiotic before they receive a result. DESIGN AND SETTING: Questionnaire survey of 974 GPs in 172 surgeries in England. METHOD: GPs were sent a questionnaire (23 questions) based on national guidance. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 90% (154/172) of surgeries and 49% (477/968) of GPs. GPs reported sending stool specimens in about 50% of cases of suspected infectious diarrhoea, most commonly because of individual symptoms, rather than public health implications. Fewer considered sampling with antibiotic-associated diarrhoea post hospitalisation, or children with acute, painful, bloody diarrhoea; only 14% mentioned outbreaks as a reason. Nearly one-half of GPs reported they would consider antibiotics in suspected cases of Escherichia coli O157, which is contraindicated. Only 23% of GPs would send the recommended three specimens for ova, cysts, and parasites (OCP) examination. Although 89% of GPs gave some verbal advice on how to collect stool specimens, only 2% of GPs gave patients any written instructions. CONCLUSION: GPs need more education to address gaps in knowledge about the risks and diagnosis of different infections in suspected infectious diarrhoea, especially Clostridium difficile post-antibiotics, E. coli O157, and requesting OCPs. Advice on reports, tick boxes, or links to guidance on electronic request forms may facilitate this.
BACKGROUND: The criteria used when GPs submit stool specimens for microbiological investigation are unknown. AIM: To determine what criteria GPs use to send stool specimens, and if they are consistent with national guidance, and whether GPs would prescribe an antibiotic before they receive a result. DESIGN AND SETTING: Questionnaire survey of 974 GPs in 172 surgeries in England. METHOD: GPs were sent a questionnaire (23 questions) based on national guidance. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 90% (154/172) of surgeries and 49% (477/968) of GPs. GPs reported sending stool specimens in about 50% of cases of suspected infectious diarrhoea, most commonly because of individual symptoms, rather than public health implications. Fewer considered sampling with antibiotic-associated diarrhoea post hospitalisation, or children with acute, painful, bloody diarrhoea; only 14% mentioned outbreaks as a reason. Nearly one-half of GPs reported they would consider antibiotics in suspected cases of Escherichia coli O157, which is contraindicated. Only 23% of GPs would send the recommended three specimens for ova, cysts, and parasites (OCP) examination. Although 89% of GPs gave some verbal advice on how to collect stool specimens, only 2% of GPs gave patients any written instructions. CONCLUSION: GPs need more education to address gaps in knowledge about the risks and diagnosis of different infections in suspected infectious diarrhoea, especially Clostridium difficile post-antibiotics, E. coli O157, and requesting OCPs. Advice on reports, tick boxes, or links to guidance on electronic request forms may facilitate this.
Entities:
Keywords:
E. coli O157; antibiotics; diarrhoea; general practice; guidance; investigation
Authors: Craig S Wong; Jody C Mooney; John R Brandt; Amy O Staples; Srdjan Jelacic; Daniel R Boster; Sandra L Watkins; Phillip I Tarr Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: D K Raynor; A Blenkinsopp; P Knapp; J Grime; D J Nicolson; K Pollock; G Dorer; S Gilbody; D Dickinson; A J Maule; P Spoor Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Victoria L Edge; Agricola Odoi; Murray Fyfe; Laura MacDougall; Shannon E Majowicz; Kathryn Doré; James A Flint; Nicole Boom; Pia K Muchaal; Paul N Sockett Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2007 Jul-Aug
Authors: Clarence C Tam; Laura C Rodrigues; Laura Viviani; Julie P Dodds; Meirion R Evans; Paul R Hunter; Jim J Gray; Louise H Letley; Greta Rait; David S Tompkins; Sarah J O'Brien Journal: Gut Date: 2011-06-27 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Maria Klezovich-Bénard; Frédérique Bouchand; Elisabeth Rouveix; Pierre L Goossens; Benjamin Davido Journal: Eur J Gen Pract Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 1.904
Authors: Laura Viviani; Mike van der Es; Lisa Irvine; Clarence C Tam; Laura C Rodrigues; Kathryn A Jackson; Sarah J O'Brien; Paul R Hunter Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 3.240