BACKGROUND: The diagnostic value of alarm features of serious infections in low prevalence settings is unclear. AIM: To explore to what extent alarm features play a role in referral to the emergency department (ED) by GPs who face a febrile child during out-of-hours care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational study using semi-structured, routine clinical practice data of febrile children (<16 years) presenting to GP out-of-hours care. METHOD: Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between alarm features of serious infections (selected from two guidelines and one systematic review) and referral to the ED. Adherence to the guideline was explored by a 2×2 contingency table. RESULTS: In total 794 (8.1%) of 9794 eligible patients were referred to the ED. Alarm signs most strongly associated with referral were 'age <1 month', 'decreased consciousness', 'meningeal irritation', and 'signs of dehydration'. Nineteen percent of 3424 children with a positive referral indication according to the guideline were referred to the ED. The majority of those not referred had only one or two alarm features present. A negative referral indication was adhered to for the majority of children. Still, in 20% of referred children, alarm features were absent. CONCLUSION: In contrast to guidance, GPs working in primary out-of-hours care seem more conservative in referring febrile children to the ED, especially if only one or two alarm features of serious infection are present. In addition, in 20% of referred children, alarm features were absent, which suggests that other factors may be important in decisions about referral of febrile children to the hospital ED.
BACKGROUND: The diagnostic value of alarm features of serious infections in low prevalence settings is unclear. AIM: To explore to what extent alarm features play a role in referral to the emergency department (ED) by GPs who face a febrile child during out-of-hours care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational study using semi-structured, routine clinical practice data of febrile children (<16 years) presenting to GP out-of-hours care. METHOD: Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between alarm features of serious infections (selected from two guidelines and one systematic review) and referral to the ED. Adherence to the guideline was explored by a 2×2 contingency table. RESULTS: In total 794 (8.1%) of 9794 eligible patients were referred to the ED. Alarm signs most strongly associated with referral were 'age <1 month', 'decreased consciousness', 'meningeal irritation', and 'signs of dehydration'. Nineteen percent of 3424 children with a positive referral indication according to the guideline were referred to the ED. The majority of those not referred had only one or two alarm features present. A negative referral indication was adhered to for the majority of children. Still, in 20% of referred children, alarm features were absent. CONCLUSION: In contrast to guidance, GPs working in primary out-of-hours care seem more conservative in referring febrile children to the ED, especially if only one or two alarm features of serious infection are present. In addition, in 20% of referred children, alarm features were absent, which suggests that other factors may be important in decisions about referral of febrile children to the hospital ED.
Entities:
Keywords:
bacterial infections; child; fever; general practice; infant; referral and consultation; signs and symptoms
Authors: Frank Buntinx; David Mant; Ann Van den Bruel; Norbert Donner-Banzhof; Geert-Jan Dinant Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Gijs Elshout; Yvette van Ierland; Arthur M Bohnen; Marcel de Wilde; Rianne Oostenbrink; Henriëtte A Moll; Marjolein Y Berger Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: R M Berger; M Y Berger; H A van Steensel-Moll; G Dzoljic-Danilovic; G Derksen-Lubsen Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Robert H Pantell; Thomas B Newman; Jane Bernzweig; David A Bergman; John I Takayama; Mark Segal; Stacia A Finch; Richard C Wasserman Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-03-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: M Thompson; A Van den Bruel; J Verbakel; M Lakhanpaul; T Haj-Hassan; R Stevens; H Moll; F Buntinx; M Berger; B Aertgeerts; R Oostenbrink; D Mant Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2012 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Jan Y Verbakel; Ann Van den Bruel; Matthew Thompson; Richard Stevens; Bert Aertgeerts; Rianne Oostenbrink; Henriette A Moll; Marjolein Y Berger; Monica Lakhanpaul; David Mant; Frank Buntinx Journal: BMC Med Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 8.775