Literature DB >> 24567430

Cost effectiveness of EML4-ALK fusion testing and first-line crizotinib treatment for patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Sandjar Djalalov1, Jaclyn Beca, Jeffrey S Hoch, Murray Krahn, Ming-Sound Tsao, Jean-Claude Cutz, Natasha B Leighl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: ALK-targeted therapy with crizotinib offers significant improvement in clinical outcomes for the treatment of EML4-ALK fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We estimated the cost effectiveness of EML4-ALK fusion testing in combination with targeted first-line crizotinib treatment in Ontario. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a Markov model from the Canadian Public health (Ontario) perspective and a lifetime horizon in patients with stage IV NSCLC with nonsquamous histology. Transition probabilities and mortality rates were calculated from the Ontario Cancer Registry and Cancer Care Ontario New Drug Funding Program (CCO NDFP). Costs were obtained from the Ontario Case Costing Initiative, CCO NDFP, University Health Network, and literature.
RESULTS: Molecular testing with first-line targeted crizotinib treatment in the population with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC resulted in a gain of 0.011 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared with standard care. The incremental cost was Canadian $2,725 per patient, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $255,970 per QALY gained. Among patients with known EML4-ALK-positive advanced NSCLC, first-line crizotinib therapy provided 0.379 additional QALYs, cost an additional $95,043 compared with standard care, and produced an ICER of $250,632 per QALY gained. The major driver of cost effectiveness was drug price.
CONCLUSION: EML4-ALK fusion testing in stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC with crizotinib treatment for ALK-positive patients is not cost effective in the setting of high drug costs and a low biomarker frequency in the population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24567430     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.1186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  34 in total

Review 1.  Bringing in health technology assessment and cost-effectiveness considerations at an early stage of drug development.

Authors:  Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Buyer beware: understanding the assumptions behind health economic assessments in personalized cancer care.

Authors:  D Ross Camidge; Adam J Atherly
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Lung cancer in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Katerina Politi; Roy S Herbst
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  ALK+ lung adenocarcinoma in never smokers and long-term ex-smokers: prevalence and detection by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Andrew S Williams; Wenda Greer; Drew Bethune; Kenneth J Craddock; Gordon Flowerdew; Zhaolin Xu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  Clinical Trials in the Genomic Era.

Authors:  Erel Joffe; Alexia Iasonos; Anas Younes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Cost-effectiveness of multiplexed predictive biomarker screening in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Dorothy Romanus; Stephanie Cardarella; David Cutler; Mary Beth Landrum; Neal I Lindeman; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 7.  Economic Considerations in the Use of Novel Targeted Therapies for Lung Cancer: Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Hamzeh Albaba; Charles Lim; Natasha B Leighl
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Therapeutic Effects of Repurposed Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: What Is Old Is New Again.

Authors:  Ashish Saxena; Daniel Becker; Isabel Preeshagul; Karen Lee; Elena Katz; Benjamin Levy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-07-08

9.  Assessing cost-utility of predictive biomarkers in oncology: a streamlined approach.

Authors:  Anton Safonov; Shiyi Wang; Cary P Gross; Divyansh Agarwal; Giampaolo Bianchini; Lajos Pusztai; Christos Hatzis
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Cost Effectiveness of Alectinib vs. Crizotinib in First-Line Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Josh J Carlson; Kangho Suh; Panos Orfanos; William Wong
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.